by Katie Marsden » 24 May 2007 00:14
by Lost in the West Stand » 24 May 2007 01:53
by Pablo Escobar » 24 May 2007 02:07
by Pablo Escobar » 24 May 2007 02:11
by brendywendy » 24 May 2007 09:33
Katie Marsden Doyle won't get 20 league goals while at Reading.
Even Rooney, Berbatov, Van Persie etc don't get 20 league goals. Drogba only just got 20 this season.
by cmonurz » 24 May 2007 09:41
by Katie Marsden » 24 May 2007 15:34
cmonurz It's remarkable that Katie 'FACT' Marsden can state this when Doyle hit 13 this season despite missing two months with injury, and continues to become a better player.
by readingfc_4_life_and_beyo » 24 May 2007 22:44
2 world wars, 1 world cup I (17) don't know what (11) all the fuss is (96.734) about (1).
by Pablo Escobar » 25 May 2007 08:28
Katie Marsden Doyle won't get 20 league goals while at Reading.
Even Rooney, Berbatov, Van Persie etc don't get 20 league goals. Drogba only just got 20 this season.
by Huntley & Palmer » 25 May 2007 10:19
by brendywendy » 25 May 2007 10:20
Huntley & Palmer Most definitely not, Doyle is a forward. Lita is an out and out striker
by Huntley & Palmer » 25 May 2007 10:23
by brendywendy » 25 May 2007 10:28
Huntley & Palmer I don't believe that anyone could say Doyle is an out and out striker. He does most of his work outside the box in holding up the ball and running down the channels.
by londinium » 25 May 2007 10:51
by gn1982 » 25 May 2007 11:00
by nivek elyod » 25 May 2007 11:24
londinium It is very unlikely that Doyle will get 20 next season for 2 reasons.
1) Very few strikers get 20 a season in the premiership especially allowing for squad rotation and injury.
2) Our style of play is more condusive to the strikers getting a split of goals between them if this season is anything to go by, especially as we had 3 strikers playing well unlike Chelsea who just had the 1 striker and most of the play was geared around him.
by brendywendy » 25 May 2007 11:26
londinium It is very unlikely that Doyle will get 20 next season for 2 reasons.
1) Very few strikers get 20 a season in the premiership especially allowing for squad rotation and injury.
2) Our style of play is more condusive to the strikers getting a split of goals between them if this season is anything to go by, especially as we had 3 strikers playing well unlike Chelsea who just had the 1 striker and most of the play was geared around him.
by Huntley & Palmer » 25 May 2007 14:28
nivek elyodlondinium It is very unlikely that Doyle will get 20 next season for 2 reasons.
1) Very few strikers get 20 a season in the premiership especially allowing for squad rotation and injury.
2) Our style of play is more condusive to the strikers getting a split of goals between them if this season is anything to go by, especially as we had 3 strikers playing well unlike Chelsea who just had the 1 striker and most of the play was geared around him.
Yes, but over 10 years it's worth a little flutter, don't you think?
by nivek elyod » 25 May 2007 18:25
Huntley & Palmernivek elyodlondinium It is very unlikely that Doyle will get 20 next season for 2 reasons.
1) Very few strikers get 20 a season in the premiership especially allowing for squad rotation and injury.
2) Our style of play is more condusive to the strikers getting a split of goals between them if this season is anything to go by, especially as we had 3 strikers playing well unlike Chelsea who just had the 1 striker and most of the play was geared around him.
Yes, but over 10 years it's worth a little flutter, don't you think?
I'd be quite interested to see how it will be paid seeing as one or both of us will not be using HNA by then
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 131 guests