Royal MonkIf only economics was that simple !!!
It is that simple .... or am i being thick ?
Royal Monk If the seat isnt in place then RFC will recieve £0.00 for it .... if they put one in then they will recieve £1000.00 (roughly) over 2 years.
If they put that money to oneside to offset the building costs then it will have paid for the seat.
Every year after that the money goes into the "running RFC" fund with the rest of the money from the other seats
I know its a simplistic way of looking at it but at the end of the day thats what it boils down to
Royal Monk If the seat isnt in place then RFC will recieve £0.00 for it .... if they put one in then they will recieve £1000.00 (roughly) over 2 years.
If they put that money to oneside to offset the building costs then it will have paid for the seat.
Every year after that the money goes into the "running RFC" fund with the rest of the money from the other seats
I know its a simplistic way of looking at it but at the end of the day thats what it boils down to
One obvious flaw in that is you have no way of 'running RFC' during the 2 years when you have devoted the entire proceeds to paying (retrospectivly ) for building the seat. OK, I know there are plenty of other revenue streams, but if we are looking at this simply....
weybridgewandererRow Z RoyalRoyal Monk Not really ... a seat is paid for after just 2 years of use by a season ticket holder , any use after that is profit
If that plastic seat cost £1000 then I'll eat my hat.
you better start eating your hat then
while the actual seat itself is not £1000 it does cost roughly £1000 to put each seat in a stadium
Dirk Gently in fact then the number of people who applied and didn't actually get a ST was in single figures - a reasonably large number were sold to new people with no points at all.
SymposiumDirk Gently in fact then the number of people who applied and didn't actually get a ST was in single figures - a reasonably large number were sold to new people with no points at all.
No they weren't. My girlfriend applied with 87 points and was told that the cut-off mark was set at 100 points... therefore meaning she was denied a season ticket.
Dirk GentlySymposiumDirk Gently in fact then the number of people who applied and didn't actually get a ST was in single figures - a reasonably large number were sold to new people with no points at all.
No they weren't. My girlfriend applied with 87 points and was told that the cut-off mark was set at 100 points... therefore meaning she was denied a season ticket.
Did she actually apply, because certainly once they got to the end of the applications they had ST seats left which they sold to people with zero points.
Row Z RoyalweybridgewandererRow Z RoyalRoyal Monk Not really ... a seat is paid for after just 2 years of use by a season ticket holder , any use after that is profit
If that plastic seat cost £1000 then I'll eat my hat.
you better start eating your hat then
while the actual seat itself is not £1000 it does cost roughly £1000 to put each seat in a stadium
No hat-eating I'm afraid. The plastic seat did not cost £1k.
West Stand ManRow Z RoyalweybridgewandererRow Z RoyalRoyal Monk Not really ... a seat is paid for after just 2 years of use by a season ticket holder , any use after that is profit
If that plastic seat cost £1000 then I'll eat my hat.
you better start eating your hat then
while the actual seat itself is not £1000 it does cost roughly £1000 to put each seat in a stadium
No hat-eating I'm afraid. The plastic seat did not cost £1k.
You definitely are not a candidate for The Apprentice, or anything else that requires a smattering of business nous!
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 55 guests
