by Ark Royal » 11 Jul 2007 17:50
by SpaceCruiser » 11 Jul 2007 18:02
papereyes They take the World Club Championship quite seriously though
by papereyes » 11 Jul 2007 18:08
SpaceCruiserpapereyes They take the World Club Championship quite seriously though
And not just that, Argentinean teams win their continental championship quite often and therefore qualify for the World Club Championship a lot.
According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copa_Toyota_Libertadores , Argentinean teams have won it 21 times! Compared to English clubs winning the European Cup 10 times.
by Ark Royal » 11 Jul 2007 18:57
papereyesSpaceCruiserpapereyes They take the World Club Championship quite seriously though
And not just that, Argentinean teams win their continental championship quite often and therefore qualify for the World Club Championship a lot.
According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copa_Toyota_Libertadores , Argentinean teams have won it 21 times! Compared to English clubs winning the European Cup 10 times.
Spacey, without wanting to sound patronising, ask yourself how many leagues there are in S. America and how many of these are likely to provide genuine contenders for the Copa Libertadores?
by papereyes » 11 Jul 2007 19:01
Ark RoyalpapereyesSpaceCruiserpapereyes They take the World Club Championship quite seriously though
And not just that, Argentinean teams win their continental championship quite often and therefore qualify for the World Club Championship a lot.
According to this http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Copa_Toyota_Libertadores , Argentinean teams have won it 21 times! Compared to English clubs winning the European Cup 10 times.
Spacey, without wanting to sound patronising, ask yourself how many leagues there are in S. America and how many of these are likely to provide genuine contenders for the Copa Libertadores?
Six nations out of ten have provided winners of the Copa Libertadores. In Europe, it is ten out of... who knows how many?
papereyes Oh, and they took the World Club Championship seriously to basically prove that they weren't a no-mark league.
by papereyes » 11 Jul 2007 19:49
by papereyes » 11 Jul 2007 19:57
papereyes I'll add a ' ' to make the implication of that post clearer for those who need that level of help.
by papereyes » 11 Jul 2007 19:59
Daniellapapereyes I'll add a ' ' to make the implication of that post clearer for those who need that level of help.
Yawn. No fishing in these waters.
by Ark Royal » 11 Jul 2007 20:02
papereyes You really do miss the point, its painful.
The top Argentinian and Brazilian teams took the old Intercontinental cup seriously as it was the only way they could prove to the rest of the world that their leagues were the equals of the European ones, given that the very Euro-centric media would tend to suggest that their leagues were 'no-mark' ones.
Ignorant? Or actually correct?
papereyesDaniellapapereyes I'll add a ' ' to make the implication of that post clearer for those who need that level of help.
Yawn. No fishing in these waters.
No, I was just being rude.
by cornwalls » 11 Jul 2007 20:22
by bb0118 » 11 Jul 2007 20:52
by weybridgewanderer » 11 Jul 2007 21:24
by bottom left hand corner » 11 Jul 2007 21:29
by floyd__streete » 11 Jul 2007 21:44
Users browsing this forum: Biscuit goalie, Freddy and 221 guests