by Behindu »
16 Aug 2007 15:21
Schards#2 Point 1 - unless they sold out yesterday, that's wrong.
Do you accept you are wrong on this ?
Schards#2 Point 2 - goes to demonstrate the falling demand. Skyline suggest there was no evidence of any fall in demand .
Classic case of not even comparing apples with pears - you are trying to compare apples with washing machines and failing to recognise the extreme weakness inherent
Schards#2 Point 3 & 4 - Yes, as I was trying to get tickets for friends to both matches..
I would be very surprised if Everton in particular sold out 'weeks' before. It would help if you had evidence, I can;t quote anything one way or the other but don't recall that game (pre Xmas ?) selling out especially fast,
Schards#2 But I simply will not accept the premise that there is no evidence that the demand for tickets has fallen. If you, Woodcote, Hoop Blah et al want to keep arguing that the earth is flat and that if something takes a day to sell out it is in no more demand than if it takes a month to sell out, feel free. I'll keep telling you you're just plain wrong.
Sadly it's you who are wrong.
You definition of 'demand' is wrong and you totally fail to either read, understand or accept points other people have made. You need to move away from inventing hypotheitcal examples constructed to support your predetermined stance and look at the real world.
Bear in mind the actual issue is not whether there are a few hundred people not buying tickets but whether expansion is justified, your 'facts' do nothing to show that expansion is not justified because you have delved off into a side show and ignored all the other points made that debunk your line of thinking.