by Melbguy » 16 Aug 2007 13:32
by Behindu » 16 Aug 2007 13:46
by Archies Volley » 16 Aug 2007 14:17
RoyaleeM Brook Most uncharacteristically, Shorey had a mare last night
I thought that actually - at fault for both goals and he struggled against them all night. I can't remember him winning a tackle. I suppose it was always going to be tough for him after chasing down their players on Saturday though.
by mini _dariusz » 16 Aug 2007 15:19
Archies VolleyRoyaleeM Brook Most uncharacteristically, Shorey had a mare last night
I thought that actually - at fault for both goals and he struggled against them all night. I can't remember him winning a tackle. I suppose it was always going to be tough for him after chasing down their players on Saturday though.
Harsh!
At fault for the second possibly as tried to tackle Kalu with his wrong foot twice and let him lay the ball off but why was Drogba in so much space?
As for the first he was the final cover, did very well to even get close but fat frank poked it past him, by the same token USA was as fault as although he came out fat frank poked it under him The problem was no one tracked fat frank and our centre halves missed two headers letting them flick the ball on twice - Bikey was caught very flat footed for the first of these
by Archies Volley » 16 Aug 2007 16:45
mini _dariuszArchies VolleyRoyaleeM Brook Most uncharacteristically, Shorey had a mare last night
I thought that actually - at fault for both goals and he struggled against them all night. I can't remember him winning a tackle. I suppose it was always going to be tough for him after chasing down their players on Saturday though.
Harsh!
At fault for the second possibly as tried to tackle Kalu with his wrong foot twice and let him lay the ball off but why was Drogba in so much space?
As for the first he was the final cover, did very well to even get close but fat frank poked it past him, by the same token USA was as fault as although he came out fat frank poked it under him The problem was no one tracked fat frank and our centre halves missed two headers letting them flick the ball on twice - Bikey was caught very flat footed for the first of these
First goal - Cisse didn't track Lampard hence Murty having a pop at him after it went in. Thought Shorey could've blocked Lampard's run however.
Second goal - Shorey needed to be much stronger in the challenge.
by Melbguy » 17 Aug 2007 01:05
Behindu Very hard to see why we'd 'agree a price' and then add the caveat on...
If it happens I'll admit you were right, but it sounds as unlikley as you picking up a couple of world class Argentinians for nothing and not stopping to think that it stunk like a 4 week old haddock !
We're under no pressure to sell Shorey - we've got plenty of money in the bank, he's got 2 years of his contract, he's expressed no desire to leave and we have no ready made replacement.
The next 6 days will tell, but I can;t see a move happening.
by The whole year inn » 17 Aug 2007 04:27
retro royal I thought Shorey didn't look up for it, and this could be the last time we see him in a Reading shirt
by Behindu » 17 Aug 2007 07:51
Melbguy
The Independent is claiming we've made a bid
.
by Melbguy » 17 Aug 2007 09:04
BehinduMelbguy
The Independent is claiming we've made a bid
.
Which they have done a number of times over the summer, none of which have been correct !
It doesn't mention when the alleged bid was made and in contrast to the other one it doesn;t say it has been accepted, which is waht you had previoulsy stated....
by Behindu » 17 Aug 2007 10:52
MelbguyBehinduMelbguy
The Independent is claiming we've made a bid
.
Which they have done a number of times over the summer, none of which have been correct !
It doesn't mention when the alleged bid was made and in contrast to the other one it doesn;t say it has been accepted, which is waht you had previoulsy stated....
Not saying that there was anything in it, just posting it.
by Row Z Royal » 17 Aug 2007 12:58
BehinduMelbguyBehinduMelbguy
The Independent is claiming we've made a bid
.
Which they have done a number of times over the summer, none of which have been correct !
It doesn't mention when the alleged bid was made and in contrast to the other one it doesn;t say it has been accepted, which is waht you had previoulsy stated....
Not saying that there was anything in it, just posting it.
From the total lack of detail it smacks very much of the 'we printed this story ages ago and nothing's happened so we'll just mention it again to fill the last paragraph'
by Behindu » 17 Aug 2007 14:13
Row Z Royal It was mentioned in the middle of the piece, which also put Sidwell forward for the England midfield.
by warrpp » 17 Aug 2007 18:50
by TheLawnMowerMan » 17 Aug 2007 19:00
by Behindu » 17 Aug 2007 19:04
by andrew1957 » 17 Aug 2007 19:08
by Top Flight » 17 Aug 2007 19:09
by Behindu » 17 Aug 2007 19:09
andrew1957 The rumour going round is that West Ham have tabled a bid for Shorey.
.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 76 guests