by Betty's Biscuit » 25 Aug 2007 22:32
by 'lista » 25 Aug 2007 22:43
Platypuss Never, but it least having seen teh performance might give those opinions some credibility.
by sachalois » 25 Aug 2007 22:45
Alan PartridgeRoyal RotherAlan Partridge Can totally understand Coppell's policy, these players were superb last season but the team we had out today is NOT good enough for a Premiership side.
That team's first outing, many of whom will have been knackered after 5 games in 2 weeks including international join-ups in some cases, with 2 players making their debut, yep that sounds like an over-reaction alright!
Looking at that 16 names, it's not good enough for a Premiership team. The result says it all.
Not that angry, disappointed for everyone that went, giving up their day and lots of money for absolutely bugger all return. All well and good Steve criticisng the international games but everyone else has the same problem!! they just have the quality in the squad to cover it!!
by AthleticoSpizz » 25 Aug 2007 22:45
since when was the spelt as teh?'listaPlatypuss Never, but it least having seen teh performance might give those opinions some credibility.
Ha! Since when did Royal Rother have any credibility on this board?
by floyd__streete » 25 Aug 2007 22:55
Betty's Biscuit Golbourne seized his chance and played out of his skin. On the strength of his performance today, he really deserves to be given more opportunities to prove himself as a Premier League player.
Betty's Biscuit Bikey: if that's how you play after nipping over to Japan and back, then watchout Sonks!
by Alan Partridge » 25 Aug 2007 23:02
by g » 25 Aug 2007 23:11
Alan Partridge Stand corrected, Long did have a shot today!!! carry on.
by Alan Partridge » 25 Aug 2007 23:14
gAlan Partridge Stand corrected, Long did have a shot today!!! carry on.
I thought it was a backpass?
by The 17 Bus » 25 Aug 2007 23:19
Alan PartridgegAlan Partridge Stand corrected, Long did have a shot today!!! carry on.
I thought it was a backpass?
Forced a save, a comfortable save but a save nonetheless.
But the proper point about midfield creativity stands.
by AthleticoSpizz » 25 Aug 2007 23:21
by Alan Partridge » 25 Aug 2007 23:28
AthleticoSpizz yes Gunnarssons lack of goals, "thus far" concerns me
Once we have our choice of 4 strikers (next week hopefully) we will see the goals again
by AthleticoSpizz » 25 Aug 2007 23:38
you are right..I wasAlan PartridgeAthleticoSpizz yes Gunnarssons lack of goals, "thus far" concerns me
Once we have our choice of 4 strikers (next week hopefully) we will see the goals again
While i'm sure you are being sarcastic, it's not Boris or Harpers lack of goals thus far that concerns me or should concern anyone. (if they play the majority of the games they should get at least 5 each) but the fact they don't create anything!!!!! can't rely on one form of attack, and the occasional bit of quality through the middle wouldn't go a miss!!
by reading98 » 25 Aug 2007 23:43
by AthleticoSpizz » 25 Aug 2007 23:45
did he let us down again today?reading98 I was there today when I saw the team I was like we have to score first otherwise we would struggle and thats how it planned out.
I still think we will be fine with are home form but we do lack quality in depth we needed a good old fashioned winger today who would put a decent pull swinging away from the keeper. I dont know how long little will be out but even if he comes back will he play 20 odd games or will it be 5 then another injury?
Seol to inconsistant!!!!
we need a right winger.
But I still think we will be fine it was bad time to play Bolton at there place with are weak back four.
come on URZ!!!!!!
by AthleticoSpizz » 25 Aug 2007 23:49
he did a good job then, consideringreading98 No he is injured was just talking in general
by The whole year inn » 25 Aug 2007 23:55
DaniellaThe whole year innDaniella Agree with RL. Its all well and good keeping existing players happy and keeping the foundation, so why is it they want to leave anyway? Sidwell gone and shorey and lita are weighing up their options...basically waiting for a better offer...what do we do about that when the existing foundations want to leave? Its not a case of sticking with what we've got if they are off is it? We are going to need to replace them with existing quality players..something you don't find cheap and have to pay for.
LOL @ you betting week in week out on the team Reading play
SimpLOLeton Alert
Where did I bet against us in regards to the team we play?
If anyone is simple its you, you're talking about something completely different.
by International Royal » 26 Aug 2007 01:37
by Ian Royal » 26 Aug 2007 02:25
AthleticoSpizzdid he let us down again today?reading98 I was there today when I saw the team I was like we have to score first otherwise we would struggle and thats how it planned out.
I still think we will be fine with are home form but we do lack quality in depth we needed a good old fashioned winger today who would put a decent pull swinging away from the keeper. I dont know how long little will be out but even if he comes back will he play 20 odd games or will it be 5 then another injury?
Seol to inconsistant!!!!
we need a right winger.
But I still think we will be fine it was bad time to play Bolton at there place with are weak back four.
come on URZ!!!!!!
I wasn't there by the way Ian
by Denver Royal » 26 Aug 2007 05:18
Ian RoyalRoyal LadyNo. I'm asking how you can build brick on brick when in all eventuality, we could end up losing a lot of players in one go, either at the end of the season or within the next two years. Please don't patronise me.Ian RoyalRoyal Lady That is all well and good and to be admired, but what happens if Murts retires at the end of the season, Seol leaves, Lita and Shorey leave at the end of their contracts, Ingi retires in a couple of years.... how do we entice other players of Premiership quality to the club?
Are you asking what do we do if someone who rarely pulls their weight leaves and someone who spends an increasingly large amount of time injured retires, and 3 people leave in 2 years time?
Wow, what a worst case scenario that one is.
How will we replace them? Much the same as we did Sidwell I imagine.
Users browsing this forum: biff, Greatwesternline, Mid Sussex Royal, RG30 and 213 guests