by Compo's Hat » 26 Sep 2007 00:15
by AndyRFC » 26 Sep 2007 00:21
Compo's Hat 13 pages and not one mention that 1:53 is a bit quick when the average is 3 minutes.
by Uke » 26 Sep 2007 10:27
Kitsonistazac naloenKitsonistazac naloenLeroy is the publisher - he distributed the pics
NOTW have not printed a pic other than Lita's sex face, he can hardly argue the toss here can he?
What pictures?
A. It's a video
B. He didn't "publish" anything.
The law relates to publishing of photographs in magazines and the like.viewing or non-commercially showing such a photo in private, generally does not create legal exposure, at least in the United States.
Keep clutching at those straws though.
Beg to differ "To publish" in the UK is defined as:
To make information available and distribute it to the public.
Unless you could prove that Leroys intent was not to publish he could be charged under the Obscenity Laws, which prohibit the "publishing" of Offensive or Obscene material. By clicking on Send he's publishing, and it might be described as wreckless, but that's what he's done. Once sent to teammates he's effectively publishing it, by putting it in the public domain. You could argue that the teamates equal a private party, but a good lawyer would carve that up. The girl could sue for this as she does not appear to know what he's done and therefore did not give consent. This would be invasion of privacy at the least.
Overall though, he's been a bit of a k**b again. He's young, rich and not too bright. All said and done he's a footballer and they use their feet not their brains. If every guy his age could, they would. Steve should sit him down, talk to him and ask him to be a bit more careful. Also the rest of the team need to understand that what happens between them stays between them. What should be of more concern is which b*****d leaked it to the press. when he sent it Leroy couldn't know what a chain of events he'd started, but I bet he does now.
Liverpool fans are quick to pick up on anything like this, wait for the chants tonight.
To throw that back any decent defence lawyer would carve up the claims that he published it, he showed it to some mates, that's private.
Things like this crop up on the internet all the time with NO convictions for anyone.
The video isn't even in the public domain, the newspaper has reported it exists and shown a "clip" of Leroy but nothing more.
But he didn't "show it" to his mates he sent it, that's publishing. The only reason that there have been no convictions before is that the other parties have been too embarrassed to admit they are in it. That's all Litas got to rely on now.
As others have pointed out the NOTW's gutter journos will be trawling around trying to find her and offer her money for her "side" of the story. Often a threat to the ISP of legal action is enough to have the material removed. Ms Diaz et al have worked this angle.
But and it's a big but, the CPS may decide at any time that a test case of publishing obscene material should be mounted against say Youtube or other similar ISPs to get a formal ruling on electronic publication of material which offends or is likely to outrage public decency.
by 79Royal » 26 Sep 2007 10:56
by zac naloen » 26 Sep 2007 11:21
As the Government has stated its stance on cyberbullying which is what this is the Kitsonista is correct.
by Yorkshire Royal » 26 Sep 2007 11:22
by Sir Rodney Effing » 26 Sep 2007 11:26
Yorkshire Royal Got to say. Probably the most mature performance from Leroy. I cant recall a single dive..
by mzungu_royal » 26 Sep 2007 11:43
Sir Rodney EffingYorkshire Royal Got to say. Probably the most mature performance from Leroy. I cant recall a single dive..
Do you mean a muff dive?
by SpaceCruiser » 26 Sep 2007 12:09
by mph1871 » 26 Sep 2007 12:36
by Far Canal » 26 Sep 2007 13:23
SpaceCruiser Great over head kick.
by Skin » 26 Sep 2007 13:38
Uke Ignoring the arguments about the sex, if Leroy is sued, loses and maybe even gets a custodial sentence based on his 'previous'. How many of you wuld still have the 'It doesn't matter' stance as we pay his wages.
by Yorkshire Royal » 26 Sep 2007 13:43
by Sir Rodney Effing » 26 Sep 2007 13:44
SkinUke Ignoring the arguments about the sex, if Leroy is sued, loses and maybe even gets a custodial sentence based on his 'previous'. How many of you wuld still have the 'It doesn't matter' stance as we pay his wages.
YOU F UCKING WHAT?!!!
You're just making yourself look stupid now.
by RoyalBlue » 26 Sep 2007 13:46
SkinUke Ignoring the arguments about the sex, if Leroy is sued, loses and maybe even gets a custodial sentence based on his 'previous'. How many of you wuld still have the 'It doesn't matter' stance as we pay his wages.
YOU F UCKING WHAT?!!!
You're just making yourself look stupid now.
by Royal Rother » 26 Sep 2007 13:48
SkinUke Ignoring the arguments about the sex, if Leroy is sued, loses and maybe even gets a custodial sentence based on his 'previous'. How many of you wuld still have the 'It doesn't matter' stance as we pay his wages.
YOU F UCKING WHAT?!!!
You're just making yourself look stupid now.
by SpaceCruiser » 26 Sep 2007 13:56
Royal RotherSkinUke Ignoring the arguments about the sex, if Leroy is sued, loses and maybe even gets a custodial sentence based on his 'previous'. How many of you wuld still have the 'It doesn't matter' stance as we pay his wages.
YOU F UCKING WHAT?!!!
You're just making yourself look stupid now.
Not as stupid as you are for taking him seriously!!
by Denver Royal » 26 Sep 2007 14:00
79Royal Let's leave his private life out of it.
by Millsy » 26 Sep 2007 14:14
Denver Royal
And as for "As long as Lita scores goals on the field, then I don't care what he does off it', well, what garbage. And what if he doesn't score goals? Then what he did suddenly becomes wrong? Puhlease. What he did is either right or wrong, and what he does on the field should have no bearing on it.
by Yorkshire Royal » 26 Sep 2007 14:23
Users browsing this forum: Four Of Clubs, Orion1871, tidus_mi2 and 129 guests