UkeYorkshire Royal LOL at Reading fans.. willing Lita away.
Why?
He's always had a lack of consistency in the box and 9 out of 10 times he shoots too early!
think 9/10 times is overstating it massively
by brendywendy » 29 Nov 2007 12:21
UkeYorkshire Royal LOL at Reading fans.. willing Lita away.
Why?
He's always had a lack of consistency in the box and 9 out of 10 times he shoots too early!
by brendywendy » 29 Nov 2007 12:24
ScarfaceYorkshire RoyalScarface I'm sorry your comment is laughable. If Lita's attitude is effecting the sqaud then it does become relevant. For years managers have sold players for non-playing reasons and I believe it will happen with Lita.
Sorry but that is laughable. Show me one example of how Lita is effecting the squad for the worse? Give me one quote from a Reading player, or even a rumour, from a squad member that Lita is rocking the boat? You literally have no idea. All we know is that he got in the Sunday papers again for the wrong reason. And then he was dropped after a shocking performance. It's funny how your local press man has a completely different view to that painted by the club member that Whore Jackie quotes in a later post. Is he very professional, or do they get rid? Or maybe he was dropped for a poor display.
People dont like him because he has an attitude and an arrogance about him. It's what he does on the pitch for 90 mins that counts. Reading fans are so bloody high and mighty about this. Who cares what he does in his private life as long as no laws are broken. You have clearly judged him already...
I have met him when out in Reading and believe me he acts like a total w@nker.
by RoyalBlue » 29 Nov 2007 12:43
ScarfaceYorkshire Royal It's just the fact that people want to get rid because of his "attitude". If you think he is shit, then fair enough.. but his "attitude" as a reason is just laughable..
I'm sorry your comment is laughable. If Lita's attitude is effecting the sqaud then it does become relevant. For years managers have sold players for non-playing reasons and I believe it will happen with Lita.
I reckon there's more to his recent dropping than has been made public and a local press man told me
by Alan Partridge » 29 Nov 2007 12:47
ScarfaceYorkshire RoyalScarface I'm sorry your comment is laughable. If Lita's attitude is effecting the sqaud then it does become relevant. For years managers have sold players for non-playing reasons and I believe it will happen with Lita.
Sorry but that is laughable. Show me one example of how Lita is effecting the squad for the worse? Give me one quote from a Reading player, or even a rumour, from a squad member that Lita is rocking the boat? You literally have no idea. All we know is that he got in the Sunday papers again for the wrong reason. And then he was dropped after a shocking performance. It's funny how your local press man has a completely different view to that painted by the club member that Whore Jackie quotes in a later post. Is he very professional, or do they get rid? Or maybe he was dropped for a poor display.
People dont like him because he has an attitude and an arrogance about him. It's what he does on the pitch for 90 mins that counts. Reading fans are so bloody high and mighty about this. Who cares what he does in his private life as long as no laws are broken. You have clearly judged him already...
I have met him when out in Reading and believe me he acts like a total w@nker.
by Dirk Gently » 29 Nov 2007 13:05
Alan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
by Magicman » 29 Nov 2007 15:15
Dirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
by brendywendy » 29 Nov 2007 15:22
MagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
by Old Biscuitman » 29 Nov 2007 15:27
by Dirk Gently » 29 Nov 2007 15:36
brendywendyMagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
really?
has shagging some bird and filming it affected his commitment to the team, mental attitude and fitness?
i doubt very much whether getting involved in a ruckus in brizzle did either
by brendywendy » 29 Nov 2007 15:42
Dirk GentlybrendywendyMagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
really?
has shagging some bird and filming it affected his commitment to the team, mental attitude and fitness?
i doubt very much whether getting involved in a ruckus in brizzle did either
Surely any ruckus is bound to affect him physically - but putting himself in positions where what was a late-night, drunken, ruckus is likely to occur does not show the best commitment to the cause or the greatest level of intelligence.
And yes, I know these things can happen to anyone, but it does seem to be a little more than once or twice with our Leroy.
Sadly, he seems to want to have all the trappings of being a Premier League player without first having put in all the application and dedication to prove that he is one.
by MartinRdg » 29 Nov 2007 15:46
brendywendyMagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
really?
has shagging some bird and filming it affected his commitment to the team, mental attitude and fitness?
i doubt very much whether getting involved in a ruccus in brizzle did either
by Katie Marsden » 29 Nov 2007 15:50
by Magicman » 29 Nov 2007 15:52
brendywendyMagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
really?
has shagging some bird and filming it affected his commitment to the team, mental attitude and fitness?
i doubt very much whether getting involved in a ruccus in brizzle did either
by brendywendy » 29 Nov 2007 15:55
MagicmanbrendywendyMagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
really?
has shagging some bird and filming it affected his commitment to the team, mental attitude and fitness?
i doubt very much whether getting involved in a ruccus in brizzle did either
Oh yeah he is much better player for it, you can tell by his first team performances surely
by Dirk Gently » 29 Nov 2007 15:56
brendywendyDirk GentlybrendywendyMagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
really?
has shagging some bird and filming it affected his commitment to the team, mental attitude and fitness?
i doubt very much whether getting involved in a ruckus in brizzle did either
Surely any ruckus is bound to affect him physically - but putting himself in positions where what was a late-night, drunken, ruckus is likely to occur does not show the best commitment to the cause or the greatest level of intelligence.
And yes, I know these things can happen to anyone, but it does seem to be a little more than once or twice with our Leroy.
Sadly, he seems to want to have all the trappings of being a Premier League player without first having put in all the application and dedication to prove that he is one.
many of the rest of the squad have been seen out in the night after matches-putting themselves in the path of ruckus' everywhere
a tap in the face, and some stitches, will have negligible effect on how well he played the following week
more intelligent people than leroy will get involved in a ruckus every week, intelligence is not really relevant
surely the ruckus hasd only happened twice with leroy?
most of th eback room staff have been quoted saying how dedicated he is, how hard a trainer he is, etc etc
by brendywendy » 29 Nov 2007 16:56
Dirk GentlybrendywendyDirk GentlybrendywendyMagicmanDirk GentlyAlan Partridge I repeat - Who cares?
I couldn't give a fook what any of our players do in their spare time.
I could. If they're doing things that mean their commitment to the team (mental attitude or fitness) is affected - then that's surely got to be an issue.
Could not have put it any better myself
really?
has shagging some bird and filming it affected his commitment to the team, mental attitude and fitness?
i doubt very much whether getting involved in a ruckus in brizzle did either
Surely any ruckus is bound to affect him physically - but putting himself in positions where what was a late-night, drunken, ruckus is likely to occur does not show the best commitment to the cause or the greatest level of intelligence.
And yes, I know these things can happen to anyone, but it does seem to be a little more than once or twice with our Leroy.
Sadly, he seems to want to have all the trappings of being a Premier League player without first having put in all the application and dedication to prove that he is one.
many of the rest of the squad have been seen out in the night after matches-putting themselves in the path of ruckus' everywhere
a tap in the face, and some stitches, will have negligible effect on how well he played the following week
more intelligent people than leroy will get involved in a ruckus every week, intelligence is not really relevant
surely the ruckus hasd only happened twice with leroy?
most of th eback room staff have been quoted saying how dedicated he is, how hard a trainer he is, etc etc
Yes, many other players have been in similar situations, but somehow it never seems to happen to them, does it? The sad fact seems to be that he's unable to get involved.
Theree's been more than the 1 or 2 incidents, haven't there been. I can think of at least 3 or 4, plus quite a few unsavoury stories circulating. He might be dedicated in training, but it seems that there's something about him that attracts trouble of one kind or another.
It's sad - at the start of this year he really seemed to have been sorted out by SC and I thought this season was really going to be the one where he'd be a world-beater. But because of one thing and another it's just not happened and we seem to be back to square one - and I can only think there's something in his behaviour or attitude that is behind it.
by Dirk Gently » 29 Nov 2007 17:15
brendywendy i just think not all of the stuff thats talked about him is fair/true
by SpaceCruiser » 29 Nov 2007 17:22
by Old Biscuitman » 29 Nov 2007 17:25
by Behindu » 29 Nov 2007 17:26
brendywendy admittedly 3 more than anyone else in the squad
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 276 guests