brendywendyWycombe Royalbrendywendy organic food cannot feed the world
fact
What percentage can it feed?
37.679%
FACT
Just over a 1 in 3 chance of survival. Not bad.
by Wycombe Royal » 12 Nov 2007 13:45
brendywendyWycombe Royalbrendywendy organic food cannot feed the world
fact
What percentage can it feed?
37.679%
FACT
by Dirk Gently » 12 Nov 2007 13:46
by brendywendy » 12 Nov 2007 13:48
Wycombe RoyalbrendywendyWycombe Royalbrendywendy organic food cannot feed the world
fact
What percentage can it feed?
37.679%
FACT
Just over a 1 in 3 chance of survival. Not bad.
by donface » 12 Nov 2007 14:04
brendywendyWycombe RoyalbrendywendyWycombe Royalbrendywendy organic food cannot feed the world
fact
What percentage can it feed?
37.679%
FACT
Just over a 1 in 3 chance of survival. Not bad.
no, much higher than that, as we live in the affluent west, and in temperate climate
its the third world that would really suffer when pesticides arent allowed
by brendywendy » 12 Nov 2007 14:18
donfacebrendywendyWycombe RoyalbrendywendyWycombe Royalbrendywendy organic food cannot feed the world
fact
What percentage can it feed?
37.679%
FACT
Just over a 1 in 3 chance of survival. Not bad.
no, much higher than that, as we live in the affluent west, and in temperate climate
its the third world that would really suffer when pesticides arent allowed
All of your arguments are correct, but only as of today.
Organic farming has made huge leaps in the last ten years, and there is nothing to suggest that this trend is going to do anything but go on. Give it another ten years and I would suggest that we will be looking at a very different picture.
by zac naloen » 12 Nov 2007 14:19
donfacebrendywendyWycombe RoyalbrendywendyWycombe Royalbrendywendy organic food cannot feed the world
fact
What percentage can it feed?
37.679%
FACT
Just over a 1 in 3 chance of survival. Not bad.
no, much higher than that, as we live in the affluent west, and in temperate climate
its the third world that would really suffer when pesticides arent allowed
All of your arguments are correct, but only as of today.
Organic farming has made huge leaps in the last ten years, and there is nothing to suggest that this trend is going to do anything but go on. Give it another ten years and I would suggest that we will be looking at a very different picture.
by higher » 12 Nov 2007 17:56
by TFF » 04 Dec 2007 16:26
Dave Kitson “But, look, I walk into our merchandise shop at Reading and I’m amazed at the s*** football clubs manage to sell to their fans. Football is a successful business because people are eternally bound to their clubs. And everyone in this game has their hand out, everyone wants to get rich, while the fans just get poorer. They hook you, then they hook your son, and when they’ve got as much from you as they can get, they go to the Far East for more.
by Gus the teenage cow » 04 Dec 2007 16:40
by working class hero » 04 Dec 2007 16:50
[/b]Gus the teenage cow I didn't realise so many Reading fans were country yokels or pikeys but looking in the mirror I would have to reassess my judgements
by Gus the teenage cow » 04 Dec 2007 17:00
by brendywendy » 04 Dec 2007 17:09
Gus the teenage cow why arent we discussing organic farming????
by Gus the teenage cow » 04 Dec 2007 17:13
brendywendyGus the teenage cow why arent we discussing organic farming????
my thoughts exactly
by brendywendy » 04 Dec 2007 17:22
Gus the teenage cowbrendywendyGus the teenage cow why arent we discussing organic farming????
my thoughts exactly
but you were getting rightly stuck into the argument, say no to organic farming and of the two theories proposed
1) wait for all cows to be killed so we can sue the land for non-meat farming or
2) just change farming practices completely to arable farming
i support neither
by RoyalBlue » 05 Dec 2007 08:22
by Hahnemann's Hairdresser » 05 Dec 2007 10:36
RoyalBlue His recent comments re the USA/Sonko incident once again seem pretty much spot on.
by Wycombe Royal » 05 Dec 2007 11:06
Hahnemann's HairdresserRoyalBlue His recent comments re the USA/Sonko incident once again seem pretty much spot on.
I missed this, what did he say?
by SpaceCruiser » 05 Dec 2007 11:17
Hahnemann's HairdresserRoyalBlue His recent comments re the USA/Sonko incident once again seem pretty much spot on.
I missed this, what did he say?
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 05 Dec 2007 13:43
arable land is land that is tilled by arabs. An arab can live for a whole year on one grain of rice...brendywendy arable just means farmable
arable land, is land able to support crops
arable farming doesnt make sense
Users browsing this forum: 6ft Kerplunk, Google [Bot] and 213 guests