Coppell's Big Gamble

Mr Sonko
Member
Posts: 13
Joined: 24 Jul 2004 18:51
Location: Gloucestershire

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Mr Sonko » 03 Feb 2008 23:28

Actually think this is JM's big gamble...
Why can Bolton afford Cahill and Taylor but we have to make do with unknown imports who may take six monthe to come up to speed.? Bolton have a smaller average gate than us and access to the same TV money. Now I know they sold Anelka for £15m but really that sort of money should be available from the TV cash anyway. The reason Bolton can do it and we cant is simple; we wont pay full Prem wages to players so we only get wannabies.
This is largely becuase JM dislikes the level of wages in the Prem; this is the main reason he wants to sell in my view.
We have seen approx £70m in the last two seasons yet have spent less than £6... where is it going? I suspect its going to pay off JM's loans to the club. That way he will graduallly back out of the club even without finding a Billioinaire buyer.I'd be interested in the views of those of you who have seen the club accounts...
By the way I'll be at Everton shouting as loud as ever and have really enjoyed the last 15 years thanks largely to JM.

Gordons Cumming
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5300
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 10:52
Location: All Good Things Come To An End

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Gordons Cumming » 03 Feb 2008 23:39

Mr Sonko Actually think this is JM's big gamble...
Why can Bolton afford Cahill and Taylor but we have to make do with unknown imports who may take six monthe to come up to speed.? Bolton have a smaller average gate than us and access to the same TV money. Now I know they sold Anelka for £15m but really that sort of money should be available from the TV cash anyway. The reason Bolton can do it and we cant is simple; we wont pay full Prem wages to players so we only get wannabies.
This is largely becuase JM dislikes the level of wages in the Prem; this is the main reason he wants to sell in my view.
We have seen approx £70m in the last two seasons yet have spent less than £6... where is it going? I suspect its going to pay off JM's loans to the club. That way he will graduallly back out of the club even without finding a Billioinaire buyer.I'd be interested in the views of those of you who have seen the club accounts...
By the way I'll be at Everton shouting as loud as ever and have really enjoyed the last 15 years thanks largely to JM.


Of course it's not rocket science.

JM is getting back some of investment. ......and why not?

He has other interests other than football which is in fact low down in that particular list.

If we want to be like Bolton we need another chairman as this one wont play that particular ball game.

It's easy really.

kirkrich
Member
Posts: 117
Joined: 04 May 2005 13:10

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by kirkrich » 03 Feb 2008 23:56

We'll never get another chairman who will agree to JM's valuation

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Platypuss » 04 Feb 2008 08:25

Rev Algenon Stickleback H Most on the outside also don't appreciate how many teams are living way beyond their means. They also don't tend realise we've actually spent about £11 million since promotion.

Seol £1.5 million
Halford £2.5 million
Cisse £0.5 million
Rosenior (swap for Seol, so another £1.5 million?)
Fae £2.5 million
Bikey £1 million
Bennet £0.5 million
Matejovsky £1.5 million
Duberry £800,000
Kebe £400,000


Surely it's only worth talking about net spending - in which case you can forget Halford and Rosenior.
So that's around £9M in 2 years.

And let's not go into effective spending.

User avatar
Big Ern
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2987
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 11:50
Location: Sunny, polluted Mexico City

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Big Ern » 04 Feb 2008 08:48

Platypuss
Rev Algenon Stickleback H Most on the outside also don't appreciate how many teams are living way beyond their means. They also don't tend realise we've actually spent about £11 million since promotion.

Seol £1.5 million
Halford £2.5 million
Cisse £0.5 million
Rosenior (swap for Seol, so another £1.5 million?)
Fae £2.5 million
Bikey £1 million
Bennet £0.5 million
Matejovsky £1.5 million
Duberry £800,000
Kebe £400,000


Surely it's only worth talking about net spending - in which case you can forget Halford and Rosenior.

Maths not your strong point eh? About £7.7 mill net.

(Says me who can't spell for shit)

So that's around £9M in 2 years.

And let's not go into effective spending.


User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Platypuss » 04 Feb 2008 09:05

Big Ern
Platypuss
Rev Algenon Stickleback H Most on the outside also don't appreciate how many teams are living way beyond their means. They also don't tend realise we've actually spent about £11 million since promotion.

Seol £1.5 million
Halford £2.5 million
Cisse £0.5 million
Rosenior (swap for Seol, so another £1.5 million?)
Fae £2.5 million
Bikey £1 million
Bennet £0.5 million
Matejovsky £1.5 million
Duberry £800,000
Kebe £400,000


Surely it's only worth talking about net spending - in which case you can forget Halford and Rosenior.

Maths not your strong point eh? About £7.7 mill net.

(Says me who can't spell for shit)

So that's around £9M in 2 years.

And let's not go into effective spending.


1.5 + 0.5 + 2.5 +1 + 0.5 + 1.5 +0.8 + 0.4 = ?

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21842
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Royal Rother » 04 Feb 2008 10:13

Forest Gump Personally I agree that football carries financial risk. The clubs that are willing to take a gamble and invest in their squads deserve to get success and on this basis Reading FC do not deserve it. So if we get relegated - and this seems a pretty strong possibility - it will be no more than the Club deserves.


I tend towards the opposite view on this.

Coppell / RFC has shown a huge amount of faith in the first team squad, and in these days of rotation policies and desperation buys it is somewhat refreshing to see. Personally I think this is more deserving of success.

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Hoop Blah » 04 Feb 2008 10:16

Royal Rother
Forest Gump Personally I agree that football carries financial risk. The clubs that are willing to take a gamble and invest in their squads deserve to get success and on this basis Reading FC do not deserve it. So if we get relegated - and this seems a pretty strong possibility - it will be no more than the Club deserves.


I tend towards the opposite view on this.

Coppell / RFC has shown a huge amount of faith in the first team squad, and in these days of rotation policies and desperation buys it is somewhat refreshing to see. Personally I think this is more deserving of success.


Even if those players your showing faith in just aren't up to the job (currently at least).

Form comes and goes, players can lose confidence or that half of yard incredible quickly. Sticking by them when they're not up to it doesn't deserve success.

User avatar
Big Ern
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2987
Joined: 16 Nov 2004 11:50
Location: Sunny, polluted Mexico City

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Big Ern » 04 Feb 2008 10:19

Platypuss 1.5 + 0.5 + 2.5 +1 + 0.5 + 1.5 +0.8 + 0.4 = ?



Using these figures (and not counting any fee for Rosenior as it was straight swap
Seol £1.5 million
Halford £2.5 million
Cisse £0.5 million
Rosenior (swap for Seol, so another £1.5 million?)
Fae £2.5 million
Bikey £1 million
Bennet £0.5 million
Matejovsky £1.5 million
Duberry £800,000
Kebe £400,000

Then

- 2.5 we recieved for Halfords.


User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21842
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Royal Rother » 04 Feb 2008 10:19

My point is that the concept of loyalty and faith is more deserving of success.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21842
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Royal Rother » 04 Feb 2008 10:22

Big Ern
Platypuss 1.5 + 0.5 + 2.5 +1 + 0.5 + 1.5 +0.8 + 0.4 = ?



Using these figures (and not counting any fee for Rosenior as it was straight swap
Seol £1.5 million
Halford £2.5 million
Cisse £0.5 million
Rosenior (swap for Seol, so another £1.5 million?)
Fae £2.5 million
Bikey £1 million
Bennet £0.5 million
Matejovsky £1.5 million
Duberry £800,000
Kebe £400,000

Then

- 2.5 we recieved for Halfords.


8.7 whichever way you add it up!

User avatar
The 17 Bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3154
Joined: 24 May 2006 21:08

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by The 17 Bus » 04 Feb 2008 10:35

we got some money for Cox.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Platypuss » 04 Feb 2008 10:43

Big Ern
Platypuss 1.5 + 0.5 + 2.5 +1 + 0.5 + 1.5 +0.8 + 0.4 = ?



Using these figures (and not counting any fee for Rosenior as it was straight swap
Seol £1.5 million
Halford £2.5 million
Cisse £0.5 million
Rosenior (swap for Seol, so another £1.5 million?)
Fae £2.5 million
Bikey £1 million
Bennet £0.5 million
Matejovsky £1.5 million
Duberry £800,000
Kebe £400,000

Then

- 2.5 we recieved for Halfords.


Erm, yes?

Where's the £7.7M? Seeing as maths must be your strong point as it apparently isn't mine...


User avatar
Ozymandias
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 885
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:17
Location: Skating on the frozen lake of the river Cocytus

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Ozymandias » 04 Feb 2008 10:46

Real football isn't like CM.

Just thought I'd remind people.

retro royal
Member
Posts: 631
Joined: 14 Jun 2004 22:50
Location: Siesta Time in Gibraltar

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by retro royal » 04 Feb 2008 11:30

But we've been saying since promotion our defence needs to be tightend, Sonko & Inga played at the top of the games in our first season in the top flight, but could you really ever say they are among the top CB in the country. Since the summer we all thought we were weak on the right hand side, Murty maybe not quite up to the premiership & Little injured.

I just find it unbelievable that two transfer windows have passed and we have not seemingly strengthened in those areas (ok kebe, out til March, but couldn't get into a Lens team 16th in the French league).

Is it just me but the club are already preparing for the championship, cause the not showing any ambition. If we go down, on the plus side should get some nice cash for (Shorey 4m, Hunt 5m, Doyle 5m, Kitson 4m, Lita 4m) around 22m, and then re-sign Cox £500k.

Lost the faith at the moment, but still hoping things are gonna get better

Come on you Royals

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Hoop Blah » 04 Feb 2008 12:08

Ozymandias Real football isn't like CM.

Just thought I'd remind people.


This is such a pointless and dismissive statement.

Football teams are built by managers bringing in players to play in their teams. What a lot of people are saying is that we need to bring in players to supplement the ones we have because our team is not performing to the level required to make staying in the Premiership more than likely.

Can you not see that we've needed to add players to this squad?

User avatar
I'm Silly
New Member
Posts: 1
Joined: 18 Oct 2005 22:27
Location: RG2 through and through

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by I'm Silly » 04 Feb 2008 12:52

The only possible hope we have of staying up is if Coppell for once in his life has the guts to hold his hands up and admit defeat. If he is not gone before the Everton match we are fooked.

User avatar
Platypuss
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 8203
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 21:46
Location: No one cares about your creative hub, so get your fukcin' hedge cut

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Platypuss » 04 Feb 2008 12:57

I'm Silly The only possible hope we have of staying up is if Coppell for once in his life has the guts to hold his hands up and admit defeat. If he is not gone before the Everton match we are fooked.


Keep sock puppets off HNA.

User avatar
Royal Rother
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 21842
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:22
Location: The handsome bald fella with the blue eyes

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by Royal Rother » 04 Feb 2008 12:58

HB, I think what Ozy is saying is that this is the real world not a fantasy one.

It is not just a case of identifying a player and going out and getting him?

Anyway, Coppell believes he has the players capable of getting us out of this situation already here at the club so why would he want to go out and sign more players? There's no logic to that.

Many disagree with him but at this stage I'd go with his judgment over that of people who've never played or managed at any kind of level, (except on CM of course).

We shall see...

User avatar
RoyalBlue
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 11779
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 22:39
Location: Developed a pathological hatred of snakes on 14/10/19

Re: Coppell's Big Gamble

by RoyalBlue » 04 Feb 2008 13:46

Yet Coppell is repeating many of the mistakes that he previously admitted to having made earlier in his career.

And talking about his big gamble. Who in their right mind gambles on teams like the Ivory Coast and Cameroon getting knocked out of the ACON early and gives that as yet another justification for not strengthening the squad during the transfer window?!! :evil:

In the past SC has often said that he recognises that when the team us doing well he is great and when they aren't he is crap. Well I'm afraid he is developing a bit of a smell.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Royality creeps In and 197 guests

It is currently 27 Nov 2024 07:11