by papereyes »
09 May 2008 11:35
How was your season?
Pretty dire. I don't think anyone was really expecting a repeat of last season but with a few astute signings, the same team ethic and a smattering of good fortune, midtable safety could and, arguably, should have been achieved. To make it worse, the first three games saw us play well as a team and get a good point at Old Trafford, run Chelsea close and then beat Everton.
After that, it went downhill. Losing three nil to Bolton, then West Ham, struggling to get results against the teams around us, embarassing games where we concede seven. The two Fulham games showed our level - comfortably beaten by a team that, if we were to stay up, we should beat.We didn't, we've not looked like doing so, and that's why we're in the relegation zone with one game to go and safety in the hands of others.
Happy with the gaffer?
The debate has to be centred around a simple question: "Could we have done better". I personally think we've lost three players from last season and simply not replaced them. As a result, the first team is not as good and the squad is not as deep.
In Sidwell, we had a player who knew his job in the side; to break up attacks on the one hand and to join the attack with a bit of quality on the other. We replaced him with the man who was his understudy. Amazingly, some Reading fans saw this as a strengthening of the side but I think this was more to do with how he left than any rational views on his abilities.
In Little, we had someone who was skillful, really skillful. Last season, the Reading method was to stop the other side attacking through the centre and to break down the wings, with overlapping fullbacks. The two wingers were key to this and Little's ability to beat his man gave us the ability to create something out of nothing. So with him out with a long term injury, the best option to the squad was to sell his cover, the admittedly underperforming Seol Ki-Hyeon.
Finally, Leroy Lita has to be mentioned. In a season where our strikers have all played poorly for the majority of the season, the talented Lita's utter refusal to show any level of commitment or ability stood out. Kitson had a run of goals that may be what keeps us up, Doyle and Long at least work hard. Lita believed his own hype and filmed a sex-tape.
So what has this to do with Coppell? Three players, all out of the side for three reasons and we failed to adequately replace all three. Even at January, when it was clear what our problems were (porous midfield, players in the wrong position in midfield, misfiring strikers), we failed to sign adequate cover. Maybe Jimmy Kebe will come good and I think Matejovsky is talented but we didn't strengthen. Our rivals did and we've won 3 games since the transfer window. A mediocre season has descended into farce because of a stated unwillingness to bring in players. We are playing against a finacial inequality but surely a club can identify where it needs to strengthen and purchase accordingly. There must be under-rated and under-appreciated or younger players out there that would strengthen.
With the increasing number of defeats, there have been increasing rumours of player unrest culminating in Sonko and record signing Fae being banned from the stadium for 2 weeks. A few seasons ago, Reading had had a decent start to a Championship season then went 3 months without getting more than the odd win. After that season, the management took a long hard look at what they did and what had happened and planned how to avoid it. The next season, we lost two league games all season. If we survive, I hope for a similar process and a large improvement in the club's successes.
Who were the stars - and who flopped?
In the first third of the season - Hunt. Then Sunderland came sniffing and he signed a new contract and hasn't been very good.
In the middle third of the season - Kitson. A handful of goals of real quality but then he failed to provide a breath test and has scored one goal since.
In the final third of the season - Bikey. Dropped after some poor early performances, he looks like the player we've missed all season. We still haven't won too many games with him in the side.
The goalkeeper has been solid but unspectacular throughout.
Flops - Lita. After a great European U-21s, he should have played himself into getting serious mentions of an England call up. He didn't and it is basically all his own fault. Shorey and Sonko have also failed to repeat last season's form. Perhaps it should have been expected that players couldn't perform to that level for more than two seasons, but the levels to which some players have dropped at times is inexcusable. I'd also include all our major signings. Although clearly talented, not one has stepped up to the plate and made himself a regular in the starting XI. Matejovsky, if he stays, looks like he might. The rest have not and do not look like doing so.
Who do you want to win the Champions League? Chelsea, Man Utd, not bothered?
I don't care. I'd like to see Avram Grant win it because he's clearly not good enough and just a stooge for the chairman ((C) English press, when he took over).
Fabio Capello - right choice, wrong choice, not bothered?
With the current set up and players, England should look for quarter finals as standard, semifinals with luck or homebacking and failure to get to or past the group stages as proof as the manager not being good enough. Capello is a decent manager, so with a bit of luck, some organistaion, semifinals should be possible. If anyone thinks his nationality has any import, then they deserve Steve McLaren.
I do hope the English media stops utterly underestimating good sides like Russia and Croatia. A bit of realism on their part might make things easier and better.
Game 39 - good idea, bad idea, not bothered?
Do you think I, as a fan, have any say in the matter?