by kwik-silva » 21 May 2008 19:53
by Arnie_Pie » 21 May 2008 19:57
by Denver Royal » 21 May 2008 19:57
Ian Royal I have very little time for Shorey now. We are better off without him and with a few £m more in our account.
by Platypuss » 21 May 2008 19:57
by RoyalBlue » 21 May 2008 19:58
Platypuss Surely you have to admire the honesty?
Chaney I don`t care if this is a dodd, but I think it deserves its own thread.
for anyone that reads the EP the headlines jumped out of the paper at me today.
so now we must sell before we can buy states the chairman, it begs the question, what has happened to the transfer funds that were not spent last season? SC went public and stated that the funds were there but he chose not to spend..was he lying?..doubtful
Nigel Howe now says there is a hole in our budget, what happened to the millions in TV money from the premiership?..and don`t tell me it was all spent on wages..thats total bollocks!!!
so who is telling porkies here?..there is quite clearly money at this club, BUT WHAT THE F*CK AS HAPPENED TO IT???
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 21 May 2008 20:16
by RG30 » 21 May 2008 20:34
by Richi Royal » 21 May 2008 20:51
by Royal With Cheese » 21 May 2008 21:35
by floyd__streete » 21 May 2008 21:47
Ian Royal he deserves a load of stick on his first return visit to the Mad stad
by Royal With Cheese » 21 May 2008 21:51
floyd__streeteIan Royal he deserves a load of stick on his first return visit to the Mad stad
Very magnanimous of you. I am sure he will console himself with the fact that his first return to the MadStad with his new club with his new club to face the wrath of Ian Royal will be a long time in coming.
by PlasticRoyale » 21 May 2008 21:52
floyd__streeteIan Royal he deserves a load of stick on his first return visit to the Mad stad
Very magnanimous of you. I am sure he will console himself with the fact that his first return to the MadStad with his new club to face the wrath of Ian Royal will be a long time in coming.
by Royalee » 21 May 2008 22:22
Ian Royal I have very little time for Shorey now.
He has been one of our best players for a long time and has been at the club through thick and thin. But confirmation that he has wanted away for a while and that it has impacted on his performances, which have been rather lack lustre. Along with not having the good grace to come over to the fans after Derby and acknowledge us, let alone bid us goodbye, means he has had his head turned by the prima-donna culture in the prem, that we are better off without him and with a few £m more in our account and that he deserves a load of stick on his first return visit to the Mad stad.
by Millsy » 21 May 2008 22:44
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 21 May 2008 23:07
RoyalBlue Yet again it looks like we are set to replicate the disastrous 'sale of the century' that we witnessed after the playoff final loss against Bolton where our players of true ability were sold off to raise money and reduce the wage bill in favour of cut price & low quality replacements.
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 21 May 2008 23:11
2 world wars, 1 world cup To me it says Madejski is a tight c*nt. The reason why Parj left, the reason why Burns didn't have half the chance to be what he could be, the reason why we're back down.
by floyd__streete » 21 May 2008 23:13
Rev Algenon Stickleback H2 world wars, 1 world cup To me it says Madejski is a tight c*nt. The reason why Parj left, the reason why Burns didn't have half the chance to be what he could be, the reason why we're back down.
Congratulations. You are the first person to suggest Tommy Burns was hindered by a below average transfer budget.
by rhroyal » 21 May 2008 23:15
by Royal Rother » 21 May 2008 23:19
Royal With Cheese Just for the record, I'm firmly in the "Where has the money gone" camp. Even if we assembled a squad of 25 all on 25K per week the wage bill would be 32m per year. I would be stunned if our wage bill came anywhere near that figure.
by peeping bernal » 21 May 2008 23:33
Users browsing this forum: Clyde1998 and 193 guests