by Denver Royal »
23 May 2008 05:28
Ian Royal Sids was happy to stay and play out his contract and to put in good performances. Shorey has wanted away for some time and has already been in poor form because of it. The only thing we should do if we can't get more than £1.5m for him is make him rot on gardening leave. We'll see who wants him after a year without first team football and no professional training.
Heh, I recall when Sids left. He was worse than dog shiate and was viewed as the second coming of the devil. He was ridiculed left right and centre.
And then he was photographed at Shorey's wedding. And I recall asking about Shorey and the possibility of his leaving. At that time Shorey was the golden child and I was shouted down. Shorey was the blued eyed boy who had no ego and, unlike Sids, he really cared about the club.
Yet now it would appear that Sids is viewed differently, and better than Shorey. At least Sids (in hindsight, if not at the time) played hard and didn't have an attitude and saw his contract through.
So is this a learning curve within HNA? Is it some kind of Premiership evolution that little ole Reading are trying to adjust to? Woodcote Royal, do you still hate Sids and love Shorey? Does anyone have the nads to concede a point and give it up?
P.S. If Shorey leaves, does anyone in here honestly believe that as we 'strengthen the team' we'll actually be better and stronger at the left back position this coming season?