by brendywendy » 22 May 2008 20:52
by Man Friday » 22 May 2008 21:03
brendywendy and i didnt even tell anyone to piss off anywhere
by brendywendy » 22 May 2008 21:06
by IMAMATEOFJOVSKY » 22 May 2008 21:12
Royal Rother After losing 3-0 to Bolton, come on then, let's have it all on one thread.
Poor, second best all over the pitch, Doyle and Long powder puff, De La Cruz exposed, Hahnemenn indecisive, Fae all at sea, Golbourne a little boy lost...?
We are facing a relegation struggle....
Or will we all remain sensible and realistic?
by brendywendy » 22 May 2008 21:25
IMAMATEOFJOVSKYRoyal Rother After losing 3-0 to Bolton, come on then, let's have it all on one thread.
Poor, second best all over the pitch, Doyle and Long powder puff, De La Cruz exposed, Hahnemenn indecisive, Fae all at sea, Golbourne a little boy lost...?
We are facing a relegation struggle....
Or will we all remain sensible and realistic?
Dont forget the font of all football knowledge started this thread.... and hes been talking sh*te ever since
by URZZZZZZZZ » 22 May 2008 22:55
URZZZZZZZZ I've always doubted Coppell. Tommy Burns can expect a letter this week pleading him to come back.
by Ian Royal » 24 May 2008 14:06
brendywendy yes , well, good
im just jolly glad someone out theres paying attention
i really am
by Royal Rother » 24 May 2008 15:42
IMAMATEOFJOVSKYRoyal Rother After losing 3-0 to Bolton, come on then, let's have it all on one thread.
Poor, second best all over the pitch, Doyle and Long powder puff, De La Cruz exposed, Hahnemenn indecisive, Fae all at sea, Golbourne a little boy lost...?
We are facing a relegation struggle....
Or will we all remain sensible and realistic?
Dont forget the font of all football knowledge started this thread.... and hes been talking sh*te ever since
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 26 May 2008 13:07
Ian Royalbrendywendy yes , well, good
im just jolly glad someone out theres paying attention
i really am
I apologised too. I also didn't have a problem with constructive criticism as there was clearly plenty to criticise. I had a problem with defeatism and unnecessary and unfair criticism. The STGs may have been right about relegation, but many of them had a view so polarised is was untrue.
As did a few of the RTGs. Had we stayed up the STGs concerns wouldn't have been unfounded, just as the RTGs confidence and faith weren't unfounded just because we got relegated.
by brendywendy » 27 May 2008 09:59
by Platypuss » 27 May 2008 10:22
brendywendy dont think thats true either-
vast majority of posters on here were saying 17th place would be fantastic
most were quite measured about it
by papereyes » 27 May 2008 10:27
brendywendy dont think thats true either-
vast majority of posters on here were saying 17th place would be fantastic
most were quite measured about it
by brendywendy » 27 May 2008 10:32
papereyesbrendywendy dont think thats true either-
vast majority of posters on here were saying 17th place would be fantastic
most were quite measured about it
It's OK, we won't miss Sidwell, will we?
by Hoop Blah » 27 May 2008 10:33
by papereyes » 27 May 2008 10:46
brendywendypapereyesbrendywendy dont think thats true either-
vast majority of posters on here were saying 17th place would be fantastic
most were quite measured about it
It's OK, we won't miss Sidwell, will we?
i never said we wouldnt miss him though
i did point out some of his shortcomings though
which isnt the same thing at all
by Royal Rother » 27 May 2008 14:04
by Ian Royal » 27 May 2008 17:22
Smoking Kills Dancing DoeIan Royalbrendywendy yes , well, good
im just jolly glad someone out theres paying attention
i really am
I apologised too. I also didn't have a problem with constructive criticism as there was clearly plenty to criticise. I had a problem with defeatism and unnecessary and unfair criticism. The STGs may have been right about relegation, but many of them had a view so polarised is was untrue.
As did a few of the RTGs. Had we stayed up the STGs concerns wouldn't have been unfounded, just as the RTGs confidence and faith weren't unfounded just because we got relegated.
But the RTGs were not arguing that we wou;dn't go down.
They were saying we would not be involved in a relagation scrap, would finish mid table easily and that anyone who thought otherwise knew less about football.
That's what annoyed people.
by Man Friday » 27 May 2008 17:57
Ian Royal ...the RTGs confidence and faith weren't unfounded just because we got relegated.
by Ian Royal » 27 May 2008 19:04
Man FridayIan Royal ...the RTGs confidence and faith weren't unfounded just because we got relegated.
??? de facto yes it was.
by Denver Royal » 27 May 2008 19:14
Ian Royal So you are saying that had we survived by the flukiest of late Pompey goals the STGs would have had no point at all?
Users browsing this forum: Orion1871, Royals and Racers and 139 guests