by londinium »
11 Jun 2008 14:34
Sort of sums it up that 2 of our 'better performances to show we are far better than bottom 3 material' were losses.
Reading lost the 2nd most amount of games in the league, and were 2nd in goals conceeded. They weren't better than bottom 3 material.
It was blatantly obvious to anyone who watches Reading that a central midfielder of proven quality was needed, it was blatantly obvious that we needed a decent right winger. The deadwood wasn't cleared last season, Coppell put faith into some players that have NEVER been good enough (Oster for example) and Reading went down. The whole squad lacked a freshness and a bit of quality. I am still amazed that a manager with his experience and nouse couldn't see that, it's all well and good saying it now, it's far too late. The January window was critical to Reading's season, everyone on here and at the games I spoke to said the same thing. Just like from our first transfer window being a Premiership club, we failed. Reading went down because of it.[/quote]
I still think we were good enough to stay up with the squad we had. The reason we didn't is due to the players and the manager. The key matches were clearly those two games against Bolton and Fulham at home. My question is how come the players were so unmotivated in those two games? Can anyone answer this? Please don't go back to the January transfer window again. I was SO bored of all the discussion in January. Can't we change the record?
Once again why were the players so unmotivated in those two crucial games?[/quote]
Unmotivated? I don't think that was the problem. I just think our overachieving CCC squad was thoroughly outplayed by two teams full of international players that underachieved for most of the season.
both Bolton's and Fulham's teams were and are MILES better than Reading's team.[/quote]
Firstly Bolton and Fulhams teams were not MILES better than our as their points and final position relative to ours clearly shows.
Secondly you cannot have it both ways...
We finished third bottom because we deserved it, we finished 8th because we were good.
Or we overacheived and finished 8th and underachieved and finished 18th.
You cant say that we deserved 18th and over achieved to finish 8th or I will say we deserved 8th and underachieved to finish 18th.
You get what you get and that is it.
Last edited by
londinium on 11 Jun 2008 14:35, edited 1 time in total.