by Bill Oddie's Beard » 09 Jul 2008 10:52
by Zammo » 09 Jul 2008 11:08
by Archie's penalty » 09 Jul 2008 11:12
by PlasticRoyale » 09 Jul 2008 11:14
Zammo Back page of today's EP.
LOL if he thinks we are going straight up. Actually LOL at anyone who thinks that.
by readingbedding » 09 Jul 2008 11:15
by brighton_royal » 09 Jul 2008 11:16
by Archie's penalty » 09 Jul 2008 11:17
by Royalee » 09 Jul 2008 11:19
by Southbank Old Boy » 09 Jul 2008 11:23
brighton_royal LOL at anyone who doesn't realise that getting promoted then being bought by someone significantly richer than JM is absolutely the best thing that could happen to our club.
by Vision » 09 Jul 2008 11:26
Royalee It's a reasonable expectation, but there you are quite right in that there is no chance of it happening with the current clown in charge.
Best manager in the country? ROFL!
Fergie, Wenger, Scolari, Benitez, Moyes, Hughes, Brown, Allardyce, Redknapp, Ramos, Johnson, Ince and so on are all superior for starters.
by Focher » 09 Jul 2008 11:27
Zammo Back page of today's EP.
LOL if he thinks we are going straight up. Actually LOL at anyone who thinks that.
by Norfolk Royal » 09 Jul 2008 11:29
by Tilehurst Mike » 09 Jul 2008 11:32
by Royalee » 09 Jul 2008 11:35
VisionRoyalee It's a reasonable expectation, but there you are quite right in that there is no chance of it happening with the current clown in charge.
Best manager in the country? ROFL!
Fergie, Wenger, Scolari, Benitez, Moyes, Hughes, Brown, Allardyce, Redknapp, Ramos, Johnson, Ince and so on are all superior for starters.
I'll humour you today. Its all relative to resources really. Coppell is the best manager JM could employ because he will happily work within the constraints set by the chairman. He knows full well he's unlikely to find another manager with Coppell's pedigree in getting sides to punch well above their financial weight. Therefore as far as the man who employs him is concerned he is the best manager he could want.
by Southbank Old Boy » 09 Jul 2008 11:42
RoyaleeVisionRoyalee It's a reasonable expectation, but there you are quite right in that there is no chance of it happening with the current clown in charge.
Best manager in the country? ROFL!
Fergie, Wenger, Scolari, Benitez, Moyes, Hughes, Brown, Allardyce, Redknapp, Ramos, Johnson, Ince and so on are all superior for starters.
I'll humour you today. Its all relative to resources really. Coppell is the best manager JM could employ because he will happily work within the constraints set by the chairman. He knows full well he's unlikely to find another manager with Coppell's pedigree in getting sides to punch well above their financial weight. Therefore as far as the man who employs him is concerned he is the best manager he could want.
And Madejski's informed you of this then has he?
Here's a question I've still never had answered by the HNA conspiracy brigade...
If Coppell didn't feel he had the resources available in order to take the club forward, WHY has he gone on record as saying that the chairman gives him his FULL backing financially and he enjoys an excellent relationship with him? Given his bargaining position with the fans and thus the board on the back of finishing 8th, Madejski would have had a riot on his hands if Coppell had informed the media that he wanted more funds in order to secure better players and wasn't being given them.
I've yet to have that question answered though and I'm sure you'll all continue to avoid answering it as it makes a complete mockery of your argument.
by Row Z Royal » 09 Jul 2008 11:44
by brendywendy » 09 Jul 2008 11:45
by Mr Controversial » 09 Jul 2008 11:46
Here's a question I've still never had answered by the HNA conspiracy brigade...
If Coppell didn't feel he had the resources available in order to take the club forward, WHY has he gone on record as saying that the chairman gives him his FULL backing financially and he enjoys an excellent relationship with him? Given his bargaining position with the fans and thus the board on the back of finishing 8th, Madejski would have had a riot on his hands if Coppell had informed the media that he wanted more funds in order to secure better players and wasn't being given them.
by Royalee » 09 Jul 2008 11:47
Southbank Old Boy
Because it's a two way street.
Coppell is happy with a limited budget (limited in comparison to most of our Premiership rivals that is). Madejski made that available to him and so Coppell was happy that he had the full backing of his chairman. He still didnt actually go and spend it though
Another manager might've wanted a bigger budget in order to improve the squad. Coppell didn't.
It's one of the clubs weaknesses, and it's strength, that the manager isn't pressuring the board for more money. You could argue that a manager with a different outlook and different methods might've been knocking on the chairmans door demanding more money to avoid the squad drifting to relegation.
by Archie's penalty » 09 Jul 2008 11:52
Mr ControversialHere's a question I've still never had answered by the HNA conspiracy brigade...
If Coppell didn't feel he had the resources available in order to take the club forward, WHY has he gone on record as saying that the chairman gives him his FULL backing financially and he enjoys an excellent relationship with him? Given his bargaining position with the fans and thus the board on the back of finishing 8th, Madejski would have had a riot on his hands if Coppell had informed the media that he wanted more funds in order to secure better players and wasn't being given them.
Mr Coppell has shown on many (too many) occassions that he has unfounded loyalties to certain players - could it be that Mr C doesnt actually have any requirements to purchase new players has he still has his blinded view that we have a strong enough squad here and now - a fundamental reason for our relegation in the first place. It will be interesting to see if these players that could no wrong in teachers eyes will repay that loyalty by sticking around and not jumping ship.
If a manager has no request for any money then its no wonder this fits straight in to Mr M's plans and hence why Mr C can say he is awarded the full backing of the Chairman - which in reality is £0.
I still think the fundamental here is not whether there is or isnt money, but why we are unable to convince players to come here - salary cap anyone?
And who is it that imposes such an outdated and uncompetitive salary bracket?
Mr Madejski is treating RFC like a used car - do it up on the cheap and spend as little as possible, give it a spit and polish and hope that someone will be attracted. If and when sold its someone elses problem if it breaks down.
Mr C
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 40 guests