BR2 Saw Hammond on Sky Sports this morning-he was very guarded when asked about Kitson leaving.
goodbye ginger ninja
by brendywendy » 16 Jul 2008 09:51
BR2 Saw Hammond on Sky Sports this morning-he was very guarded when asked about Kitson leaving.
by Focher » 16 Jul 2008 09:51
by Alan Partridge » 16 Jul 2008 09:58
Wycombe RoyalMELKSHAM HOOPS Dave Out 5 Mill.....Clinton In 0 mill......my guess
Morrison is trining with Coventry in Switzerland.
by Alan Partridge » 16 Jul 2008 09:59
Focher He's a gonner.
The rumour is Hulse in as soon as he leaves
by BR2 » 16 Jul 2008 09:59
by The whole year inn » 16 Jul 2008 10:02
Focher
The rumour is Hulse in as soon as he leaves
by Focher » 16 Jul 2008 10:08
The whole year innFocher
The rumour is Hulse in as soon as he leaves
Source
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 16 Jul 2008 10:09
by Wycombe Royal » 16 Jul 2008 10:16
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe If we really had our finger on the pulse we'd get Helguson.
I expect us not to replace Kits though and Coppell to say he is happy with what he's got.
Joking aside, Doyle, Lita, Long should be more that good enough. Would rather spend money on the midfield and defense.
by Alan Partridge » 16 Jul 2008 10:18
Wycombe RoyalSmoking Kills Dancing Doe If we really had our finger on the pulse we'd get Helguson.
I expect us not to replace Kits though and Coppell to say he is happy with what he's got.
Joking aside, Doyle, Lita, Long should be more that good enough. Would rather spend money on the midfield and defense.
Three strikers is not enough. One injured and who is on the bench? 4 is a minimum and 5 is better.
by Wycombe Royal » 16 Jul 2008 10:24
Alan PartridgeWycombe RoyalSmoking Kills Dancing Doe If we really had our finger on the pulse we'd get Helguson.
I expect us not to replace Kits though and Coppell to say he is happy with what he's got.
Joking aside, Doyle, Lita, Long should be more that good enough. Would rather spend money on the midfield and defense.
Three strikers is not enough. One injured and who is on the bench? 4 is a minimum and 5 is better.
absolutely agreed, also an area overlooked last season, I felt we were a striker light
by Smoking Kills Dancing Doe » 16 Jul 2008 10:26
by BR2 » 16 Jul 2008 10:43
by Royal Rother » 16 Jul 2008 10:43
Smoking Kills Dancing Doe Gotta stay realistic.
Coppell's not gonna make the signings we need.
by BR2 » 16 Jul 2008 10:47
Royal RotherSmoking Kills Dancing Doe Gotta stay realistic.
Coppell's not gonna make the signings we need.
Why not? A manager who has as superb a record as Coppell's must presumably have shown himself capable of making the signings needed to bring success.
So much emphasis is being placed on inactivity in one season in the top flight - is it not reasonable to look beyond just last year? This is the same guy who won the Manager of the Year Award 2 seasons on the trot and it seems incredible to dismiss his ability to build a successful team because of 1 season's failings.
by leon » 16 Jul 2008 10:52
by Alan Partridge » 16 Jul 2008 10:59
leon yeah and all in one season before he buggers off
Kitson has been pretty much our best player for the last 4-5 years - it's 1995 all over again.
by leon » 16 Jul 2008 11:10
Alan Partridgeleon yeah and all in one season before he buggers off
Kitson has been pretty much our best player for the last 4-5 years - it's 1995 all over again.
Exactly the reason there is Premier League interest. We are going to lose people we don't want, that's the price of relegation.
If we get £4.5million for a 28/29 year old with a chequered injury past that wouldn't be bad business.
by BR2 » 16 Jul 2008 11:15
by Alan Partridge » 16 Jul 2008 11:20
BR2 It might not be bad business but we are not exactly short of money and don't forget that last season our management told us that players were very difficult to buy.
Hopefully that difficulty was just in the Premiership.
If Kitson goes it is not the end of the world but we will need a decent replacement if we are to make any sort of challenge this season.
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot] and 201 guests