by Bill Oddie's Beard » 17 Jul 2008 21:05
by howser » 17 Jul 2008 21:05
by rg6royal » 17 Jul 2008 21:05
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 17 Jul 2008 21:08
by rfcjoe » 17 Jul 2008 21:09
by Archie's penalty » 17 Jul 2008 21:09
by Matt de K » 17 Jul 2008 21:11
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 17 Jul 2008 21:12
by holsgrove breaks a leg » 17 Jul 2008 21:13
by howser » 17 Jul 2008 21:13
by silas » 17 Jul 2008 21:15
by TFF » 17 Jul 2008 21:16
howser Sky Sports report that Kits will sign for Stoke for £5m tomorrow, do we have to pay Cambridge any of the received fee as a sell on clause ??
by Platypuss » 17 Jul 2008 21:16
by SCIAG » 17 Jul 2008 21:17
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 17 Jul 2008 21:17
by hutch » 17 Jul 2008 21:18
by Rev Algenon Stickleback H » 17 Jul 2008 21:19
given the complete incompetence of the Cambridge board at the time, I wouldn't be certain.That Friday Feelinghowser Sky Sports report that Kits will sign for Stoke for £5m tomorrow, do we have to pay Cambridge any of the received fee as a sell on clause ??
Given that we had to pay a further instalment on promotion to the PL, and that it's pretty standard to have a sell-on clause (Orient will get one when Shorey goes), I'd be very surprised if we didn't.
by TFF » 17 Jul 2008 21:22
by holsgrove breaks a leg » 17 Jul 2008 21:23
by Man Friday » 17 Jul 2008 21:24
Matt de K Gutted. But at least we got a decent price. I would be screwing if he went for 3.
Users browsing this forum: Hendo and 190 guests