Dirk GentlySouthbank Old BoyDirk Gently I thought these sell-on clauses only last for the duration of the initial contract the player signs - if he then signs another contract after that first one has expired then the sell-on clauses no longer apply. I'm not certain on this one, but ISTR that was what the get-out was with another player in similar circumstances.
I know you like to be supportive of everything the club does Dirk, but thats taking it to the extreme!
Why can that statement possibly be construed as supporting the club in any shape or form?
It's just stating a possible way that that we may be trying to wriggle out of one if it was there - we have previous form in this (It was a promotion payment payment to York for Murts - see post in a minute or two.....)
For the record, I think it's outrageous that we do everything we can to try and stop paying money to smaller clubs when it's rightfully owed - yes it's good financial management but IMHO it's immoral, unethical and not in the spirit of being part of the "football family". Have we forgotten that we were a small, lower league, club not so long ago?
I wasn't being totally serious but maybe I was giving you a bit more credit in thinking that a sell on clause could expire, unless it was actually stipulated in the terms, which it would certainly appear isn't the norm. There has been a few discussions on this subject on the site (not that I expect you to read everythng of course).
It just read a bit to me as you trying to justify the club trying to get out of paying what was due, not that it seems they're trying to do that.