by irishroyal81 » 23 Jul 2008 14:36
by Streets » 23 Jul 2008 14:40
by ArfnipIsARoyal » 23 Jul 2008 14:50
irishroyal81 very atheltic with same celebration as leroy.
by BNWA » 23 Jul 2008 14:52
by Rawlie19 » 23 Jul 2008 15:15
BNWA Streets, will you get a sodding grip - it's embarassing.
Anyway, 15-20 goals in the SPL isn't exactly a bad record and considering we're a Championship club curently it's more likely than not going to mean he is perfectly capable at this level.
by 2.8 lita injection » 23 Jul 2008 15:22
by Streets » 23 Jul 2008 15:27
BNWA Streets, will you get a sodding grip - it's embarassing.
Anyway, 15-20 goals in the SPL isn't exactly a bad record and considering we're a Championship club curently it's more likely than not going to mean he is perfectly capable at this level.
by papereyes » 23 Jul 2008 15:27
Wycombe RoyalpapereyesWycombe Royal THe thing that annoyed me most about our play last season was our tendancy to hit long balls to Kitson whenever he was on the pitch, and when he wasn't we generally kept the passes shorter and on the ground. I know which style of play I prefer to watch.
It is also a style that is more likely to be successful. If you can get it right.
Is it? West Brom were not a long ballside, and neither were Hull or Bristol City.
It is a style that is good if you are just an average team with big strong players but is awful to watch.
I'd much prefer us to go back to playing 442 with traditional wingers and getting the ball out wide at every opportunity and breaking with pace. IF you can get that working you will win most matches as we proved 3 seasons ago.
by Alan Partridge » 23 Jul 2008 15:31
by SpaceCruiser » 23 Jul 2008 15:33
Streets We are going to struggle this season because our chairman is holding us back.
by Wycombe Royal » 23 Jul 2008 15:39
papereyes I really do think that I was agreeing with you there or is it a general preset on hobnob to assume someone, anyone, is disagreeing with you? My sentence is meant to follow on directly from the "style of play that [you] prefer to watch".
by Only one Trevor Morley » 23 Jul 2008 15:52
by BNWA » 23 Jul 2008 15:55
Streets Embarassing is a club finishing just outside Europe, still refusing to spend even £4m in the transfer market the following season and then getting relegated.
Embarassing is getting relegated, pockets full of cash and still refusing to spend the money required to get in the better proven players required.
Yes of course, as with our promotion, you don't always need a team of 'proven' players, but that team was together a long time and had one hell of a fighting spirit.
We are going to struggle this season because our chairman is holding us back.
NoeLOL Hunt. Great.
by Muskrat » 23 Jul 2008 16:35
Wycombe Royalpapereyes I really do think that I was agreeing with you there or is it a general preset on hobnob to assume someone, anyone, is disagreeing with you? My sentence is meant to follow on directly from the "style of play that [you] prefer to watch".
I assume everyone is disagreeing with me. It is better that way.........
by FiNeRaIn » 23 Jul 2008 16:42
Noel Hunt "Stephen has spoken a lot about how huge they are."
by Streets » 23 Jul 2008 16:57
SpaceCruiserStreets We are going to struggle this season because our chairman is holding us back.
LOL - I'm saving this one.
by LoyalRoyal22 » 23 Jul 2008 17:04
by andrew1957 » 23 Jul 2008 17:13
by Uke » 23 Jul 2008 17:17
andrew1957 I am surprisingly excited by this signing.
He has a reasonable scoring record and is a hard worker. Dundee fans are almost all praising him and sad to see him going (if he does). Just because he doesn't carry a huge price tag does not mean he is no good. Look at Doyle and Kitson who we paid 3350K and £78K for respectively.
by Rawlie19 » 23 Jul 2008 17:24
Ukeandrew1957 I am surprisingly excited by this signing.
He has a reasonable scoring record and is a hard worker. Dundee fans are almost all praising him and sad to see him going (if he does). Just because he doesn't carry a huge price tag does not mean he is no good. Look at Doyle and Kitson who we paid 3350K and £78K for respectively.
Doyle cost over tree million as well as the points of Guinness
David Kitson what a bargain respectively!
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 206 guests