by rfcjoe » 10 Aug 2008 22:16
by Tacano » 10 Aug 2008 22:37
cmonurz Thing is, if you go to watch Bracknell Town play, despite the level of football that they play, you would still expect one or two good crosses. So, I think to call our final ball 'diabolical all game' is perfectly accurate, even if Stephen (£10,000 a week) Hunt did manage one quality ball into the box.
by URZZZZZZZZ » 10 Aug 2008 22:45
by rfcjoe » 10 Aug 2008 22:48
Tacanocmonurz Thing is, if you go to watch Bracknell Town play, despite the level of football that they play, you would still expect one or two good crosses. So, I think to call our final ball 'diabolical all game' is perfectly accurate, even if Stephen (£10,000 a week) Hunt did manage one quality ball into the box.
I can only remember two decent crosses all game. Both were by Hunt.
by Bill Oddie's Beard » 10 Aug 2008 22:50
by Big Ern » 10 Aug 2008 22:51
cmonurz Thing is, if you go to watch Bracknell Town play, despite the level of football that they play, you would still expect one or two good crosses.
by Vision » 11 Aug 2008 09:32
Big Erncmonurz Thing is, if you go to watch Bracknell Town play, despite the level of football that they play, you would still expect one or two good crosses.
I think this is our biggest problem and was a major problem last season for us as well. Thh 2 best crossers of the ball have gone, Shorey & Little. To be fair there is very litle we could do to prevent them leaving, but it comes back to the lact of activity in the transfer market and we should have signed players who can get a good ball ino the box already.
by Rawlie19 » 11 Aug 2008 09:53
by Wycombe Royal » 11 Aug 2008 10:01
rfcjoeTacanocmonurz Thing is, if you go to watch Bracknell Town play, despite the level of football that they play, you would still expect one or two good crosses. So, I think to call our final ball 'diabolical all game' is perfectly accurate, even if Stephen (£10,000 a week) Hunt did manage one quality ball into the box.
I can only remember two decent crosses all game. Both were by Hunt.
Stephen Hunt is on 25 grand mate.
Shocking I know.
by Hoop Blah » 11 Aug 2008 10:04
Rawlie19 I know that at least some of you are nobbers (literally) as you were trying to get a "Bill Oddie" chant going, so I hope you read this and are ashamed... Doubt it though. Small minded racist bigots will get off on a post like this.
by Rawlie19 » 11 Aug 2008 10:08
Hoop BlahRawlie19 I know that at least some of you are nobbers (literally) as you were trying to get a "Bill Oddie" chant going, so I hope you read this and are ashamed... Doubt it though. Small minded racist bigots will get off on a post like this.
Bill Odie pre-dates Hob Nob by years.
by Gordons Cumming » 11 Aug 2008 10:14
Royalshow All together not really that impressed.We looked for the long ball far to often when we should have kept it on the deck.Doyle was very unlucky with his chance but an away win would properly not have been deserved.
The stewards were complete tits to be honest.When there are plenty of empty seats and no one is blocking anyones view,why insist of telling people to sit down
by Royalshow » 11 Aug 2008 10:20
Gordons CummingRoyalshow All together not really that impressed.We looked for the long ball far to often when we should have kept it on the deck.Doyle was very unlucky with his chance but an away win would properly not have been deserved.
The stewards were complete tits to be honest.When there are plenty of empty seats and no one is blocking anyones view,why insist of telling people to sit down
The seats are there for a reason.
If you want to stand up at a football match go and watch a non-league team.
by papereyes » 11 Aug 2008 10:34
The thing that really struck me was that we have no-one in the team who can win the ball
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 11 Aug 2008 10:47
by Uke » 11 Aug 2008 10:49
by SpaceCruiser » 11 Aug 2008 10:51
Nick Shorey my Lord! Yesterday was like a pre-season friendly; pointless and pointless.
by cmonurz » 11 Aug 2008 10:55
Uke How many of the Back from the Match comments are a result of the genuinely awe-inspiring in its crapness and lack of excitment commentary on the television?
How many have considered that this is the first outing for two teams in a new division - one being 'nervous' after relegation and returning with its tail between its legs the other being in "go for it" mode like we were two seasons ago.
From the TV, things weren't perfect that's obvious. But its not the doom and gloom that the thread seems to suggest - not yet anyway.
Still why should that get in way of a good whinge?
by floyd__streete » 11 Aug 2008 10:56
Uke How many have considered that this is the first outing for two teams in a new division - one being 'nervous' after relegation and returning with its tail between its legs the other being in "go for it" mode like we were two seasons ago.
by Nick Shorey my Lord! » 11 Aug 2008 11:05
floyd__streeteUke How many have considered that this is the first outing for two teams in a new division - one being 'nervous' after relegation and returning with its tail between its legs the other being in "go for it" mode like we were two seasons ago.
Nervous? 8 of those who started yesterday had played for us last time we were in this division, it was hardly a trip into the unknown was it? What were they nervous of? Robert Earnshaw? Robin Hood beating up the marines?
Users browsing this forum: 72 bus and 271 guests