by rhroyal » 12 Aug 2008 16:05
by old woman » 12 Aug 2008 17:03
by Sarah Star » 12 Aug 2008 17:51
by Old Biscuitman » 12 Aug 2008 17:57
by Ian Royal » 12 Aug 2008 18:07
winchester_royal Kebe >>>>>> Oster.
Henry >>>>> Oster.
P.Brooker >>>>>> Oster.
by winchester_royal » 12 Aug 2008 18:09
Ian Royalwinchester_royal Kebe >>>>>> Oster.
Henry >>>>> Oster.
P.Brooker >>>>>> Oster.
Well I never, someone has mananged to wrestle the IR award for "most moronic posting" away from Royalee.
by Ian Royal » 12 Aug 2008 18:10
rhroyal My friend who is an impartial Leyton Orient fan watched Sunday's game on Sky and singled out Sonko and Kebe as our two best players, citing a Kebe run where he breezed past about 4 defenders and only an unlucky bounce stopped him from getting a shot off. I was at work so I didn't see it myself, but I trust this guy's opinion.
by Ian Royal » 12 Aug 2008 18:11
winchester_royalIan Royalwinchester_royal Kebe >>>>>> Oster.
Henry >>>>> Oster.
P.Brooker >>>>>> Oster.
Well I never, someone has mananged to wrestle the IR award for "most moronic posting" away from Royalee.
OK, maybe the 3rd when went too far, but the first I generally believe.
by Cookie » 12 Aug 2008 18:55
ellpryjonLower West No. Kebe is better defensively. Lets give the guy some more games to settle in.
'greed
LOL @ Reading fans passing judgement after a handful of games........
fickle as ever
by FiNeRaIn » 12 Aug 2008 18:56
by winchester_royal » 12 Aug 2008 19:00
FiNeRaIn People who thought oster was rubbish were idiots. Its partly down to you booing him that he's no longer here. Thanks to you morons we now have a clown like kebe on the right wing. Oster was a scapegoat and has/had decent technical ability, at times he made mistakes and bad decisions but he wasn't nearly as bad as doyle and no one was booing him. Doyle missed chance after chance after chance, infact had he realised where a goal was, we'd still be in the premier league, what was said about his efforts? Nothing, because he's your little favorite who can do no wrong.
by Chaney » 12 Aug 2008 19:02
by FiNeRaIn » 12 Aug 2008 19:08
winchester_royal Most people who watched the game as neutrals who I have spoken to said they thought Kebe was our best player.
by winchester_royal » 12 Aug 2008 19:14
FiNeRaInwinchester_royal Most people who watched the game as neutrals who I have spoken to said they thought Kebe was our best player.
What can you back that up with?
LOL@ you for taking your opinion as fact and expecting to win an argument with it.
by strap » 12 Aug 2008 19:15
Alan Partridge No.
We should have replaced him with someone decent. Neither Oster or Kebe are remotely good enough.
by SCIAG » 12 Aug 2008 19:42
by loyalroyal4life » 12 Aug 2008 20:22
Ian Royalloyalroyal4life NO
we should either
1.stick with kebe and hope he comes good
2. Give Henry a go and hope he comes good
3. Put Hunty on the right with convey on the left
So new signings are not an option?
by winchester_royal » 12 Aug 2008 20:23
SCIAG This board is so fickle. Most of you reject Henry out of hand, yet you want Karacan to start?
Neither has played reguarly in the first team of a Championship club, but Henry plays in a position with less competition, and is a better player. I've seen Henry play in the reserves on multiple occaisions in 3 years, I've also seen him in a few games for Bournemouth, and he is quality. Before you say "the reserve league is a completely different standard to the Championship", it is. But any player that can cross accurately in the reserves will be able to do the same in the Championship. Pretty similar story about his movement and goalscoring ability (though keepers will obviously save more in the Champ)
There is a very good reason managers like Mourinho and Jol wanted him in their own reserve sides, and that wasn't to make us numbers, or so they could joke about beating Barca to the signing of Henry.
by Platypuss » 12 Aug 2008 21:17
by SCIAG » 12 Aug 2008 21:19
Platypuss Oster scores for Palace
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 193 guests