Royal Lady I presume you're talking about Mr Mad??
Yes
by kwik-silva » 17 Aug 2008 09:34
Royal Lady I presume you're talking about Mr Mad??
by Platypuss » 17 Aug 2008 09:34
Schards#2 I simply don't believe we came out of the prem without vast profits in turns of income against expenditure.
by Royal Lady » 17 Aug 2008 09:37
by The 17 Bus » 17 Aug 2008 09:39
by kwik-silva » 17 Aug 2008 09:40
The 17 Bus And the megastore should be self financing anyway.
by Gordons Cumming » 17 Aug 2008 09:42
by The 17 Bus » 17 Aug 2008 09:44
by West Stand Man » 17 Aug 2008 09:55
PlatypussWest Stand Man It is a shame that you did not wait longer in the queue for brains. You might just have had a wider selection and had the option to get a decent one. ASh well, such is life.
As to your vitiol. Why shouldn't he wait for the 'right price'. Surely it is not unheard ofto do that? Refurbishments on a 10 year old building are petty normal. The wage bill at RFC is huge, check out the facts sometime.
Keyboard playing up?
by Northern Git » 17 Aug 2008 10:06
Royal Lady The only stadium "refurbishments" that I can think of are the media centre and the Megastore - if he thinks they're more important than players, good luck to him.
by kwik-silva » 17 Aug 2008 10:08
Northern GitRoyal Lady The only stadium "refurbishments" that I can think of are the media centre and the Megastore - if he thinks they're more important than players, good luck to him.
To be fair they did relay some of the block paving bricks that had 'settled' over the last few years.
The one item that no one has considered is the hotel extension. Wonder where the money came from for that?
by Handsome Man » 17 Aug 2008 10:09
Northern GitRoyal Lady The only stadium "refurbishments" that I can think of are the media centre and the Megastore - if he thinks they're more important than players, good luck to him.
To be fair they did relay some of the block paving bricks that had 'settled' over the last few years.
The one item that no one has considered is the hotel extension. Wonder where the money came from for that?
by kwik-silva » 17 Aug 2008 10:16
by glass half full » 17 Aug 2008 10:20
SCIAGglass half full
Footballers do not even have to serve an apprenticeship and clean the top players' boots anymore. Ambition is borne out of hunger.
Yes they do. Well, maybe not the boots cleaning, but they do have to serve an apprenticeship.
by kwik-silva » 17 Aug 2008 10:56
by brendywendy » 17 Aug 2008 11:31
by 2.8 lita injection » 17 Aug 2008 11:44
backintheday
Was a good win today but Mr Ego will be thinking," There you go, I was right. The squad is plenty big & good enough to get us back up!!! I'll buy another Bently instead!!
Don't get me wrong, I respect the bloke for all he's done for he club annd the money he's put in.
But the matter still stands that we've got a chairman that takes us for idiots and can not answer a straight forward question with a straight forward answer, without spouting his drivle and non-sense making s#@t!
Treat the fans with respect Jonny, where's the loot !?!?!?!
by Super Kevin Bremner! » 17 Aug 2008 11:54
by kwik-silva » 17 Aug 2008 12:03
by Stranded » 17 Aug 2008 12:13
by Stranded » 17 Aug 2008 12:19
Super Kevin Bremner! Two things:
What he says in public has an impact on what money grabbing agents and mercenary players expect when they try to pedal their wares on our doorstep. There is plenty of overpaid shit in football and having achieved what we've achieved by largely avoiding the financial madness of the game, we should be inspired not angry. This is common sense. No RTGs or blind optimism. We have consistently built and built a squad at an affordable premium which thankfully has almost guaranteed that I'll have a Reading FC to watch for many years to come, whatever league we're playing in.
Secondly, watching MOTD this morning and listening to Hansen and Shearer, I think the reality of the money situation really hit home.
Tottenham Hotspur have spent in excess of £150.000,000 on players since 2006, and yet their stock has only risen as far as them becoming a team that are probably 'the most likely to break into the top four if anyone does'.
So, our aspirations are what exactly? To spend £100m on players to settle for being a UEFA cup contender? Perhaps £50m on players in order to hover in medicority in 12-16th place in the Prem? So say we spend £100m and get that UEFA spot, then what next?
Who will pay for all of this? A £100m squad will command wages per year at a minimum of £30m.
Does a crowd of 25,000 and TV rights bankroll this? I don't think it does.
We'll always be Reading, meaning we'll always be preyed upon by more prestigious clubs. No-one is immune from this anymore. SAF at Man Utd has stopped the rot slightly with the Ronaldo stance he's taken and partly so had M'ON at Villa. So whatever we do, whatever we spend, we'll always feel hard done by.
The Prem has left a very bad taste in the mouth to be fair. The new found arrogance of our players has now been matched by that of our 'support'.
I honestly agree that we need to be aspiring to plying our trade at the highest level, but at what cost?
I'll take a future where I can take my son to footie week in week out with him hopefully doing the same, as a trade off against Reading gambling millions away to become a Braford City or a Leeds United, who if you remember both nearly went out of business as a result of their money madness.
So, you decide. Madjeski - Hero or Villain.
Having seen the man mastermind the achievement of one of my biggest dreams (albeit for a fleeting moment) I know which one I'd go for.
Users browsing this forum: Crusader Royal, Jammy Dodger, Royals and Racers, South Coast Royal, Vision and 198 guests