by SpaceCruiser » 27 Aug 2008 10:24
by Silver Fox » 27 Aug 2008 10:34
by kwik-silva » 27 Aug 2008 10:39
rg6royal The funny thing is that our youth players look a better footballing team and show a lot more ambition.
by Streets » 27 Aug 2008 10:40
The 17 Bus For those that think Harper does nothing can you explain why we looked off the pace after he went off??
by strap » 27 Aug 2008 10:41
Alan Partridge
Whilst I was delighted with that, really impressed I just can't see Coppell making any changes apart from the obvious one. You know these lads have come in played exactly how Reading demand and the played the sort of football I think everyone wants to see, yet we won't see Karacan saturday...Cisse back in. We won't see Henry as Kebe comes back into the side, We won't see Pearce, back come Ivar and Sonko. We MIGHT see Noel Hunt but Doyle will continue on his merry dump way. If I was a betting man, I would bet on Armstrong coming in at left back with S Hunt replacing Convey in our only change. Which in my opinion is absolutely tragic and sends out the completely the wrong message. Well done lads, you absolutely destroyed the opposition in the week put in the best individual performances of the season so I am dropping you again for someone who hasn't done anything to warrant selection.
Coppell there is the challenge, the youth have staked the claim, do you have the bottle to give these lads the opportunity they deserve or will you go back to Coppell's Clique for your selection Saturday? I know where my money is.
by kwik-silva » 27 Aug 2008 10:57
strap Not qualified to comment to such depth as I was banished to BBCRB due to work commitments. However, the commentary suggested this was a different RFC to the one we have been used to over the last 9-12 months. AP is so right in that the challenge for Sir Steve is to now drop the non-performers from Saturday and play people in form and who have the desire. Sadly, this is not going to happen. We all know that Doyle and Lita will start up front. We also know Cisse will be in midfield, with Kebe (!) on the wing, and we also know that Bikey, (who has had no pre-season as such with RFC due to Olypic duties), will stand in for Sonko if he is not in the right frame of mind etc. (I am assuming that his absence yesterday constitutes his one match ban for his red card on Saturday? Apologies if I am wrong on that).
So the likes of Pearce, Karacan, Henry, N Hunt, Golbourne et al can look forward to returning to obscurity orpossibly then bench, until LC3 comes round. Good old Sir Steve.
by T.R.O.L.I. » 27 Aug 2008 10:59
kwik-silvastrap and we also know that Bikey, (who has had no pre-season as such with RFC due to Olympic duties), will stand in for Sonko if he is not in the right frame of mind etc. (I am assuming that his absence yesterday constitutes his one match ban for his red card on Saturday? Apologies if I am wrong on that).
Does the Olympics not count as pre-season? I think the ban was domestic, so yes, the 1 match ban is over.
by kwik-silva » 27 Aug 2008 11:00
T.R.O.L.I.kwik-silvastrap and we also know that Bikey, (who has had no pre-season as such with RFC due to Olympic duties), will stand in for Sonko if he is not in the right frame of mind etc. (I am assuming that his absence yesterday constitutes his one match ban for his red card on Saturday? Apologies if I am wrong on that).
Does the Olympics not count as pre-season? I think the ban was domestic, so yes, the 1 match ban is over.
I think the bit in bold kind of nullifies your first point.
And yes, the Sonko's ban was for last night's game so he is available for Saturday.
by andrew1957 » 27 Aug 2008 11:07
by Tilehurst Mike » 27 Aug 2008 11:22
by SpaceCruiser » 27 Aug 2008 11:28
Tilehurst Mike not a 'hoofball' to be seen.
by Stranded » 27 Aug 2008 11:54
StreetsThe 17 Bus For those that think Harper does nothing can you explain why we looked off the pace after he went off??
We didn't. Karacan came into his own and if anything we looked better in the centre.
by kwik-silva » 27 Aug 2008 12:12
StrandedStreetsThe 17 Bus For those that think Harper does nothing can you explain why we looked off the pace after he went off??
We didn't. Karacan came into his own and if anything we looked better in the centre.
I disagree I'm afraid - once the double change was made we lost our way for a good 10 mins or so - admitedly at 4-0 we were always likely to take the foot off but we certainly didn't improve in the middle.
by Thomas L'Heureux » 27 Aug 2008 12:15
StrandedStreetsThe 17 Bus For those that think Harper does nothing can you explain why we looked off the pace after he went off??
We didn't. Karacan came into his own and if anything we looked better in the centre.
I disagree I'm afraid - once the double change was made we lost our way for a good 10 mins or so - admitedly at 4-0 we were always likely to take the foot off but we certainly didn't improve in the middle.
by North Somerset Royal » 27 Aug 2008 12:18
by 11.30 from paddington » 27 Aug 2008 12:42
North Somerset Royal I agree with Stranded. Harper did an excellent job last night directing the youngsters on the pitch and when he went off we lost our shape to some extent and hoofball started to creep in. I am no Harper lover and I think there are a lot of weaknesses in his game but fair dos he was inspirational last night
by BR2 » 27 Aug 2008 12:45
SpaceCruiserTilehurst Mike not a 'hoofball' to be seen.
Are you sure? I could have sworn that there were a few towards the end of the first half.
by brighton_royal » 27 Aug 2008 12:57
North Somerset Royal I agree with Stranded. Harper did an excellent job last night directing the youngsters on the pitch and when he went off we lost our shape to some extent and hoofball started to creep in. I am no Harper lover and I think there are a lot of weaknesses in his game but fair dos he was inspirational last night
by Woodcote Royal » 27 Aug 2008 13:47
StrandedStreetsThe 17 Bus For those that think Harper does nothing can you explain why we looked off the pace after he went off??
We didn't. Karacan came into his own and if anything we looked better in the centre.
I disagree I'm afraid - once the double change was made we lost our way for a good 10 mins or so - admitedly at 4-0 we were always likely to take the foot off but we certainly didn't improve in the middle.
by SpaceCruiser » 27 Aug 2008 14:02
BR2SpaceCruiserTilehurst Mike not a 'hoofball' to be seen.
Are you sure? I could have sworn that there were a few towards the end of the first half.
Quite alright for the occasional bit of hoofball Spacey but not when it becomes our main style of play.
Good to read the reports of how well the youngsters played and to hear that they played a passing game.
We will never know if Lita and Doyle might have scored hat-tricks last night but it will be interesting to see if Coppell goes with form players or out-of- form players on Saturday.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 177 guests