Julian Kelly

User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Julian Kelly

by Huntley & Palmer » 28 Aug 2008 08:56

SpaceCruiser
Platypuss
SpaceCruiser Personally, I'm hoping Kelly will become a good player.


Is there anybody here who doesn't? :|


Probably Royalee as he'll be unhappy that we're doing things on the cheap. ;)

In reality, any academy player that makes it into the first team on a regular basis will be the most expensive signing this club has ever made.

Hampshire Royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1188
Joined: 23 Apr 2004 10:56
Location: Geneva

Re: Julian Kelly

by Hampshire Royal » 28 Aug 2008 09:03

juanpablo jesus its one cross



Blasphemer!!

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Julian Kelly

by Ian Royal » 28 Aug 2008 13:13

Huntley & Palmer
SpaceCruiser
Platypuss Is there anybody here who doesn't? :|


Probably Royalee as he'll be unhappy that we're doing things on the cheap. ;)

In reality, any academy player that makes it into the first team on a regular basis will be the most expensive signing this club has ever made.


Unless 3 manage it. don't forget we've had money for Ashdown, Henderson, Tyson and Cox to offset some of the massive costs... what is it? £1m/year + extras here and there?

Thats about £1m paid off with those 4 if not more. Karacan, Pearce, Henry, Kelly, Siggurdson, & Church, could all conceivably come through in the next 3 years. Although thats very unlikely. Surely that would equate to the Academy paying for itself.

User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Julian Kelly

by Huntley & Palmer » 28 Aug 2008 13:42

How long has the academy been in place for? I didn't think we got any money for Ashdown, he left at the end of his contract. We got nominal fees for Tyson and Henderson in the last few months of their contracts and £200k for Cox. I wouldn't say that would pay for half a years worth of academy players, let alone all the staff, coaches and facilities. The fact that up until now we have not had a single player come through, not entirely the fault of the academy to be fair, means they are long overdue to produce at least one player who can stick it in the first team squad. The good thing is that it looks like we may have three coming through at once, though they aren't exactly fresh out of the academy doors. It's still been a very expensive and unsuccessful journey so far, we have had to buy promising youth players to supplement our numbers

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Julian Kelly

by Thaumagurist* » 28 Aug 2008 13:44

Huntley & Palmer We got nominal fees for Tyson and Henderson in the last few months of their contracts


We also got £££ from their subsequent transfers due to sell on clauses....


User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Julian Kelly

by Huntley & Palmer » 28 Aug 2008 15:18

Do we? Who have we got sell on clauses from out of those players then?

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Julian Kelly

by Thaumagurist* » 28 Aug 2008 15:24

.
Last edited by Thaumagurist* on 25 Jun 2010 21:58, edited 1 time in total.

Barry the bird boggler
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8153
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 08:34
Location: in my bird boggler

Re: Julian Kelly

by Barry the bird boggler » 28 Aug 2008 16:50

Huntley & Palmer How long has the academy been in place for? I didn't think we got any money for Ashdown, he left at the end of his contract.


I'm sure we got something for Ashdown as although out of contract he was under 24 so Portsmouth were obliged to pay something as he came through the youth ranks here. Think it was something like 200k, might have been as much as 300k though.

User avatar
Wycombe Royal
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6682
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 19:31
Location: Churchdown, Glos

Re: Julian Kelly

by Wycombe Royal » 28 Aug 2008 16:53

Barry the bird boggler
Huntley & Palmer How long has the academy been in place for? I didn't think we got any money for Ashdown, he left at the end of his contract.


I'm sure we got something for Ashdown as although out of contract he was under 24 so Portsmouth were obliged to pay something as he came through the youth ranks here. Think it was something like 200k, might have been as much as 300k though.

We agreed an undisclosed fee with Portsmouth a couple of days before it was due to go to a tribunal.


User avatar
Huntley & Palmer
Hob Nob Moderator
Posts: 4424
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 11:02
Location: Back by dope demand

Re: Julian Kelly

by Huntley & Palmer » 28 Aug 2008 17:26

Thaumagurist* Watford paid Gillingham £450,000 for Darius Henderson, we got a percentage of that.
Nottingham Forest paid Wycombe £675,000 for Nathan Tyson, we got a percentage of that.

OK, so with the amounts at say 10 or 20%, it's still feck all. All in with money for Ashdown on tribunal, we haven't even recouped £1 million. That is quite frankly shocking considering the amount of players that have come through the system. I know we were at a disadvantage with the surrounding Premiership clubs but our policy of not utilising youth has been a huge thorn in our side

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: Julian Kelly

by brendywendy » 28 Aug 2008 17:43

ther are very few teams in the leagues who do move alot of players through from the yoof teams,
its doable, but devlishly difficult

User avatar
Thaumagurist*
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3539
Joined: 01 Feb 2008 16:15
Location: We must now face the long dark of Exeter.

Re: Julian Kelly

by Thaumagurist* » 21 Jan 2009 10:12

Looks like he may get a start this Tuesday, I hope he'll do well. Maybe we'll find out if he's good enough to become a regular and therefore we won't be needing to get a new right back.

He won't make a bad cross like he did against Plymouth?
Last edited by Thaumagurist* on 21 Jan 2009 10:15, edited 1 time in total.

User avatar
Skyline
Member
Posts: 841
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:50
Location: The squirrel's not important

Re: Julian Kelly

by Skyline » 21 Jan 2009 10:15

Saturday?


Barry the bird boggler
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 8153
Joined: 06 Aug 2006 08:34
Location: in my bird boggler

Re: Julian Kelly

by Barry the bird boggler » 21 Jan 2009 10:31

Tuesday 27th January, ko 8pm

User avatar
URZZZZZZZZ
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 1909
Joined: 07 May 2004 20:27
Location: Long knocks it back in.............IT'S READING WHO TAKE A MASSIVE STEP TOWARDS WEMBLEY!!

Re: Julian Kelly

by URZZZZZZZZ » 21 Jan 2009 10:54

I'm really not convinced with this. First and foremost I think he looks a bit lightweight and this will get punished by Wolves' talented wing system.

Also I think Rosenior is a class player, but it still took him a while to adapt to the way Kebe plays (ie end up having to do all the defending). I don't think he will be able to turn all his attention towards defence and attack, which is what we'll miss.

The only way round the above would be to play Henry, as Im sure the two have played together plenty of times before. However I can't see Coppell changing things so drastically for such a big game.

I wish Rosi hadnt got sent off :(

User avatar
Skyline
Member
Posts: 841
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:50
Location: The squirrel's not important

Re: Julian Kelly

by Skyline » 21 Jan 2009 10:58

I hope they've got Kelly's shoulder sorted out. Be a real bugger if it popped out early in the game and he couldn't continue.

Sun Tzu
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3996
Joined: 08 Oct 2008 10:00

Re: Julian Kelly

by Sun Tzu » 21 Jan 2009 11:00

URZZZZZZZZ
The only way round the above would be to play Henry, as Im sure the two have played together plenty of times before. However I can't see Coppell changing things so drastically for such a big game.


Just because Henry and Kelly have played on the same pitch won't mean putting htem both in will help.

Whenever I've seen Kelly for the reserves or the Academy side he's played left back whereas Henry has been on the rightwing or central midfield so I'm not sure they will have much of an understanding.

londinium
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1061
Joined: 25 Sep 2004 21:45
Location: South London Royal

Re: Julian Kelly

by londinium » 21 Jan 2009 11:05

I am a firm believer in horses for courses and playing people in the correct position.

There are very few people, especially at Reading that can play a multitude of positions (only Cisse, Gunnar and Bikey spring to mind) but even then they are only mediocre when played 'out of position'.

Kelly is a natural full back and although I would much rather see Rosie or Murty at right back he is the correct option and has to be told just to concentrate on the defending aspect of the game and let the rest of the team worry about attacking. We have enough in our team and Wolves are vunerable enough all over the park for us not to need one of our two full backs pressing on.

I am nervous for the lad but hope he does really well at his job if he plays Tuesday night, namely, defending.

User avatar
Alan Partridge
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 7368
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:25
Location: In a daft little ground, watching a silly game so fcuk off

Re: Julian Kelly

by Alan Partridge » 21 Jan 2009 11:24

Sun Tzu
URZZZZZZZZ
The only way round the above would be to play Henry, as Im sure the two have played together plenty of times before. However I can't see Coppell changing things so drastically for such a big game.


Just because Henry and Kelly have played on the same pitch won't mean putting htem both in will help.

Whenever I've seen Kelly for the reserves or the Academy side he's played left back whereas Henry has been on the rightwing or central midfield so I'm not sure they will have much of an understanding.


I would like to see them line up, I think we just need to take the (steve) bull by the horns and just Go for gold.

User avatar
Baines
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1310
Joined: 23 Mar 2007 19:26

Re: Julian Kelly

by Baines » 21 Jan 2009 11:42

That makes sense AP. After all, given the current positions in the table, we're going to be playing catch-up.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 206 guests

It is currently 27 Nov 2024 01:16