by RoyalBlue »
21 Sep 2008 15:28
Number 9 Chaney lets go back a few years to the Tottenham goal/no goal at OT, the Man U keeper knew the ball was well over the line..but he didn`t ask the ref to give it did he?..therefore why should Harper be any different?
Because its a game and it would be nice to think that there was some element of fair play and sportsmanship left. Unfortunately this doesn't seem to be the case. Yes, football is a business, and yes, there are potentially tens of millions of pounds at stake, but it should be remembered that it is a game played and watched primarily for enjoyment and entertainment. Winning fairly should be put above winning at all costs. Sadly this seems to have been forgotten.
Don't you realise how the statements you have made are such uncomfortable bed fellows?!!
Business & tens of millions of pounds at stake v game played and watched primarily for enjoyment and entertainment.
Those two competing interests will never sit comfortably together. If you really want the latter, forget top class professional football in the 21st Century!
Super_horns In some ways it probably gave our players a sense of "injustice" and put us back into the game as you guys were dominating and if it had been 2-2 but with a normal "goal" I suspect a few Watford fans would say we got a bit lucky there...
In the heat of the moment I am sure our mob would have done the same (just taken the goal as it is)
And fair play to you for taking the realistic view.