by SCIAG » 24 Sep 2008 17:44
by Ian Royal » 24 Sep 2008 17:53
by Archie's penalty » 24 Sep 2008 17:55
by Ian Royal » 24 Sep 2008 17:55
by Archie's penalty » 24 Sep 2008 17:56
Ian Royal Home, so same first team as against Sheff Weds.
If it was away, I'd be seriously considering playing Coppell over Kebe.
by Archie's penalty » 24 Sep 2008 17:57
Ian Royal Why all the sudden Gunnarsson love?
by Alan Partridge » 24 Sep 2008 17:57
Archie's penaltyIan Royal Why all the sudden Gunnarsson love?
A calm head in there.
Harper and Karacan I don't think are working as a partnership.
by Boyband » 24 Sep 2008 18:01
Archie's penaltyIan Royal Home, so same first team as against Sheff Weds.
If it was away, I'd be seriously considering playing Coppell over Kebe.
Kebe was good at Watford. HTH.
by Archie's penalty » 24 Sep 2008 18:02
Alan PartridgeArchie's penaltyIan Royal Why all the sudden Gunnarsson love?
A calm head in there.
Harper and Karacan I don't think are working as a partnership.
Did alright against Wednesday!!!!
There is ZERO chance Coppell will drop his Captain.
by Archie's penalty » 24 Sep 2008 18:03
BoybandArchie's penaltyIan Royal Home, so same first team as against Sheff Weds.
If it was away, I'd be seriously considering playing Coppell over Kebe.
Kebe was good at Watford. HTH.
LOL!
by rg6royal » 24 Sep 2008 18:07
by Alan Partridge » 24 Sep 2008 18:07
Archie's penaltyAlan PartridgeArchie's penalty A calm head in there.
Harper and Karacan I don't think are working as a partnership.
Did alright against Wednesday!!!!
There is ZERO chance Coppell will drop his Captain.
So do you think that Harper and Karacan are our best midfield partnership?
I am not convinced.
My thinking was that I'd like to see Gunnarsson in there and I don't want to drop Karacan.
Tbh I wouldn't mind Harps and Jem together again - I'm just thinking of other options!
by Archie's penalty » 24 Sep 2008 18:10
by Alan Partridge » 24 Sep 2008 18:13
Archie's penalty I see what you mean and I basically agree. Would like to see Gunnarsson starting at some point. And if not we have him as an impact sub.
by Archie's penalty » 24 Sep 2008 18:15
by SteveRoyal » 24 Sep 2008 18:45
by bootboy » 24 Sep 2008 18:53
Alan PartridgeArchie's penalty I see what you mean and I basically agree. Would like to see Gunnarsson starting at some point. And if not we have him as an impact sub.
He's just getting fit and no doubt in the coming weeks will get back in. Those in posession f the shirt, bit like the Kebe/Henry situation Henry did superbly well yesterday which makes everyone jump on the Henry bandwagon and yes Kebe has been indifferent at times (more so away from home) but on the whole he's been a positive of this early season. Again Henry will get his chance at some point.
by SCIAG » 24 Sep 2008 18:54
SteveRoyal I'd quite like:
USA; Rosenior, Pearce, Bikey, Armstrong; Henry, Karacan, Gun, Shunt; N Hunt, Doyle
I think we'll get:
USA; Rosenior, Ingi, Bikey, Armstrong; Kebe, Harper, Karacan, Shunt; N Hunt Doyle
I think a Gun + Jem partnership would work. Gun is a solid midfielder (albeit he's old) and Karacan gives our midfield that extra energy.Sadly, I don't think Coppell will make any changes.
by chandog » 24 Sep 2008 19:02
by Victor Meldrew » 24 Sep 2008 19:47
Archie's penalty Our team is starting to look quite strong for this division.
The academy players have really created a buzz around the place this season. Good on them.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 143 guests