Still I don't think this season has been dull. Lots to talk about.
The sheer wtf? of getting back from football training, turning on the computer and seeing Reading 6 Sheff Wed 0 ...
by papereyes » 28 Sep 2008 11:46
Still I don't think this season has been dull. Lots to talk about.
by readingbedding » 28 Sep 2008 12:55
papereyesStill I don't think this season has been dull. Lots to talk about.
The sheer wtf? of getting back from football training, turning on the computer and seeing Reading 6 Sheff Wed 0 ...
by Rex » 28 Sep 2008 13:04
by readingbedding » 28 Sep 2008 13:12
royalexile We now as a club need to start breaking this unwritten rule that we cannot win an away game. I point away and 1 very dubious result are not playoff form. Is it the opposition, occasion, home support (not likely), travel (again not likely) or team tactics. It certainly cannot be expectation, but the team seem to have carried over the mental block of last season. Until this is sorted out the faltering start tyo the away games is always going to be the achilles heal.
by Rex » 28 Sep 2008 13:20
by Dr Hfuhruhurr » 28 Sep 2008 19:21
by Apocalypse Now » 28 Sep 2008 19:44
readingbeddingArch There's some serious goalpost moving going on. The main idea of the original post was that we'd be mid-table at best and watching Reading was going to be very dull. Since then we've won 6-0 and 4-0 and drawn 2-2 away. We're third. Call it what you like, but it's not mid-table and it's not dull.
It was emotional, frustrated, knee-jerk rubbish to be honest.
When was the original post made again?
by Arch » 28 Sep 2008 20:42
by Baines » 28 Sep 2008 22:25
Arch Can I just point out that Sarah Palin has yet to be mentioned in this thread?
by Mr Angry » 29 Sep 2008 08:21
by The 17 Bus » 29 Sep 2008 08:33
by Schards#2 » 29 Sep 2008 08:54
Mr Angry This sort of stuff always happens; an individual has decided on a point of view, and by God, they are going to stick to it come hell or high water - or indeed, 10 goals in 2 consecutive home games.
Normally Woodcote is the culprit; for it to be Schards is ironic to say the least!!
Just a historical stat (and strap, you epitomised the old saying that there are lies, damn lies and statistics!!) during our record breaking 2005/06 season, we didn't go top until November 22nd (after our demolition of Ipswich away - another irony).
Long way to go yet folks.
by Royal Rother » 29 Sep 2008 09:10
by Schards#2 » 29 Sep 2008 09:29
Royal Rother I doubt anyone would argue with your right to have and address those concerns - it's the dull and uninspiring bit people are struggling with.
by Dr Hfuhruhurr » 29 Sep 2008 09:54
Schards#2 can't see past the last game.
by Schards#2 » 29 Sep 2008 10:02
Dr HfuhruhurrSchards#2 can't see past the last game.
Or the last 3 away games?
Your original post came after Ipswich Away. I would therefore dare to suggest that your predictions on our away form were based on solely the Ipswich, Charlton and Forest games. (we were in a different league with different players before then). Since most people are basing the 'not dull' bit on the last 2 home games (and Im being kind there because we scored 6 in the 2 before that as well), the line between what is and what isnt an acceptable time to assess form is becoming thinner and thinner.
by Thaumagurist* » 29 Sep 2008 10:25
Schards#2 Do you guys actually acknowledge the existance of away fixtures?
Schards#2 There is a long way to go this season and there's probably an even longer way to go before the impact of having a chairman who doesn't want to be chairman any more is fully played out. We saw some evidence of it during the close season, I suspect that you may see some pointers in January.
Schards#2 I find it amazing that many respected posters think that the long term issues no longer exist simply because we had a couple of sizeable home wins. Another inept away display at Wolves won't make me right any more than a big home win to Swansea makes me wrong. These are long term concerns that will be played out over at least an entire season and, in all likelyhood, several.
Schards#2 In that timescale, my belief is that the squad will weaken, Coppell may well leave and we'll have difficulties finding a quality replacement while we have a chairman who doesn't want to be there, (think Newcastle on a far lesser scale). If someone can explain to me how winning big at home for a couple of games, (however welcome), resolves these concerns, i'd be interested to hear.
by brendywendy » 29 Sep 2008 10:42
Schards#2Royal Rother I doubt anyone would argue with your right to have and address those concerns - it's the dull and uninspiring bit people are struggling with.
It's all very reminiscent of the extention argument when posters were rejoicing in my stupidity at daring to suggest we shouldn't extend, every time we sold out a Premiership game. One year on, we're playing in front of thousands of empty seats at every home game.
I guess some posters have the capacity to think what might happen in the longer term and some can't see past the last game. In a year or so's time people will be able to look back and see whether the last season, as a whole, has been duller and less inspiring than the previous few (record points, eight in the prem, relegated from the prem on last day of season). Just as in the same way now, they can look back and see whether the extention would have been a good idea.
my belief is that the squad will weaken, Coppell may well leave and we'll have difficulties finding a quality replacement while we have a chairman who doesn't want to be there,
Do you guys actually acknowledge the existance of away fixtures?
by Schards#2 » 29 Sep 2008 10:56
brendywendySchards#2Royal Rother I doubt anyone would argue with your right to have and address those concerns - it's the dull and uninspiring bit people are struggling with.
It's all very reminiscent of the extention argument when posters were rejoicing in my stupidity at daring to suggest we shouldn't extend, every time we sold out a Premiership game. One year on, we're playing in front of thousands of empty seats at every home game.
I guess some posters have the capacity to think what might happen in the longer term and some can't see past the last game. In a year or so's time people will be able to look back and see whether the last season, as a whole, has been duller and less inspiring than the previous few (record points, eight in the prem, relegated from the prem on last day of season). Just as in the same way now, they can look back and see whether the extention would have been a good idea.
relegation doesnt make you right though
the point was, if we want to increase the ammount we can spend on players and wages, an increase in capacity is needed to compete in the top flight, doing so when we were up, and the money and fans were coming in was sensible in my opinion, regardless of how many empty seats it gave us-the point was it would have given us the potentialmy belief is that the squad will weaken, Coppell may well leave and we'll have difficulties finding a quality replacement while we have a chairman who doesn't want to be there,
cant argue with any of that-we will lose another couple of players in jan no doubt, and replace them with cheaper players
but wed have lost most of them at the end of last season if coppell had gone, and im not sure what we can do about madejski-he'll sell when he sells, and theres nowt we can do about it, short of some ungracious madejski out rallys.Do you guys actually acknowledge the existance of away fixtures?
in much the same way that our home form doesnt seem to have any effect on your good self?
by Mr Angry » 29 Sep 2008 11:09
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 207 guests