by cmonurz » 07 Oct 2008 21:19
by Gus the teenage cow » 07 Oct 2008 21:23
Alan Partridgewinchester_royalearleyroyal No. He is awful. I'll still support him as much as any other Reading player at the match but that doesn't disguise him being League 1 at best.
Funny how 2 well respected managers in Coppell and Trappatoni see him as a quality player then.
As If Ireland have anyone else they can pick, next in line is John Aldridge then Tony Cascarino and then Dave Mooney.
When Shane Long has proven he is good enough or warranted to start 10 games in a row and produces consistant solid performances and scored goals fairly regularly re post this.
by Pseud O'Nym » 07 Oct 2008 21:24
2 world wars, 1 world cupBonBoh
Did you type this in Russian and subsequently go to freewebtranslation.com?
Was meant to be a response the equally nonsensical post I was quoting.
by PEARCEY » 07 Oct 2008 21:26
cmonurz 9 goals in 70 appearances. It's not good enough (I can't find your examples on that thread btw so would be good if you can repost). Twice, just twice in four seasons, Long has come on as a sub and scored a goal to earn us a point or points.
It's interesting that on the '10 games' thread you highlight Lita's scoring stats, but they are apparently invalid in the case of Long.
by Millsy » 07 Oct 2008 21:26
by Yorkshire Royal » 07 Oct 2008 21:28
by PEARCEY » 07 Oct 2008 21:30
Yorkshire Royal If you'd see him play against Stoke away in the cup, you would come to the conclusion that he really shouldn't be a professional footballer.
by Gus the teenage cow » 07 Oct 2008 21:30
Yorkshire Royal If you'd see him play against Stoke away in the cup, you would come to the conclusion that he really shouldn't be a professional footballer.
by Sarah Star » 07 Oct 2008 21:31
by SCIAG » 07 Oct 2008 21:32
Yorkshire Royal If you'd see him play against Stoke away in the cup, you would come to the conclusion that he really shouldn't be a professional footballer.
by Alan Partridge » 07 Oct 2008 21:33
2 world wars, 1 world cup Longwas never meant to be anything other than a youth player with a distant hope of possibly becoming a regular.
That's why he's been brought on every now and then as a sub, and as such he's done ok for what he is.
The problem has been when due to injuries etc we've relied on the poor guy to be a full on starting striker in the same league as Doyle/Lita/Kitson, which he clearly isn't.
Give him time, treat him like an up and coming youth striker and he'll do ok and won't disappoint.
Think of him as a striker in the same league as the others and he'll get slated.
He's a "hot prospect" at the mo.
by Platypuss » 07 Oct 2008 21:35
winchester_royal 2. My post was born out of frustration at the constant abuse of Long, who appears to be the new boo boy.
by rg6royal » 07 Oct 2008 21:36
by PEARCEY » 07 Oct 2008 21:36
Alan Partridge2 world wars, 1 world cup Longwas never meant to be anything other than a youth player with a distant hope of possibly becoming a regular.
That's why he's been brought on every now and then as a sub, and as such he's done ok for what he is.
The problem has been when due to injuries etc we've relied on the poor guy to be a full on starting striker in the same league as Doyle/Lita/Kitson, which he clearly isn't.
Give him time, treat him like an up and coming youth striker and he'll do ok and won't disappoint.
Think of him as a striker in the same league as the others and he'll get slated.
He's a "hot prospect" at the mo.
He's about a year (maybe 2) younger than the much maligned Lita, how much longer is he a 'hot prospect'? If only Cox had had half the opportunites Long and for that matter Lita had in the last year or so.
Sorry but some on here say well Lita's done nothing for 2 years, fair comment. Long's done nothing for 4.
by rg6royal » 07 Oct 2008 21:38
by cmonurz » 07 Oct 2008 21:39
rg6royal He's scored us a few important goals tbh.
by Millsy » 07 Oct 2008 21:40
Alan Partridge2 world wars, 1 world cup Longwas never meant to be anything other than a youth player with a distant hope of possibly becoming a regular.
That's why he's been brought on every now and then as a sub, and as such he's done ok for what he is.
The problem has been when due to injuries etc we've relied on the poor guy to be a full on starting striker in the same league as Doyle/Lita/Kitson, which he clearly isn't.
Give him time, treat him like an up and coming youth striker and he'll do ok and won't disappoint.
Think of him as a striker in the same league as the others and he'll get slated.
He's a "hot prospect" at the mo.
He's about a year (maybe 2) younger than the much maligned Lita, how much longer is he a 'hot prospect'? If only Cox had had half the opportunites Long and for that matter Lita had in the last year or so.
Sorry but some on here say well Lita's done nothing for 2 years, fair comment. Long's done nothing for 4.
by Yorkshire Royal » 07 Oct 2008 21:40
gus what are you going to write for your 1,000th post?
by PEARCEY » 07 Oct 2008 21:41
cmonurzrg6royal He's scored us a few important goals tbh.
No, he hasn't, as I just showed.
Twice Long has come off the bench and scored points-winning goals.
Take off all Long's league goals since he joined Reading and we are only 5 points worse off in 3 and a bit seasons.
by cmonurz » 07 Oct 2008 21:42
Users browsing this forum: Majestic-12 [Bot], st george and 210 guests