by SLAMMED » 13 Oct 2008 00:18
SpaceCruiserDirk GentlyRoyal Lady Well "tango" man did a lot of standing up throughout the game, and he certainly wasn't ejected at half time, nor were his mates who were all around him.
I completely understand about the "no standing" ruling - however, time and again, we see the away supporters seemingly getting away with standing for prolonged periods, whilst the stewards "pick on" some of our fans - and these are the ones who are already at the back and not getting in people's way. Some parity with the treatment of both sets of fans would be welcome.
Agreed, in theory, but in reality it's never going to happen.
Always remember that the club don't actually want to enforce the "no standing" rule - it causes hassle and conflict an makes it unpleasant for both supporters and stewards. They are forced to be seen to be enforcing these rules by the outside agencies already mentioned.
These outside agencies accept that the club has no effective way of making away fans sit if enough of them decide to stand, so the club are able to cut them some slack. But they know that the club do have leverage with home supporters, because those home supporters have member cards and want to come back.
So as the club have to be seen to be doing something to enforce the rules, it's a no-brainer for them to be doing this in the way which is the most visible and the most effective, as required by RBC and the FLA.
The real mystery is why it's different at away grounds - I supsect it's because our supporters have such a good reputation and because so few stand or misbehave that they are easily dealt with.
Didn't we warn another club that if their fans persist with standing, they would be allocated fewer tickets next time?
by Dirk Gently » 13 Oct 2008 08:58
SpaceCruiserDirk GentlyRoyal Lady Well "tango" man did a lot of standing up throughout the game, and he certainly wasn't ejected at half time, nor were his mates who were all around him.
I completely understand about the "no standing" ruling - however, time and again, we see the away supporters seemingly getting away with standing for prolonged periods, whilst the stewards "pick on" some of our fans - and these are the ones who are already at the back and not getting in people's way. Some parity with the treatment of both sets of fans would be welcome.
Agreed, in theory, but in reality it's never going to happen.
Always remember that the club don't actually want to enforce the "no standing" rule - it causes hassle and conflict an makes it unpleasant for both supporters and stewards. They are forced to be seen to be enforcing these rules by the outside agencies already mentioned.
These outside agencies accept that the club has no effective way of making away fans sit if enough of them decide to stand, so the club are able to cut them some slack. But they know that the club do have leverage with home supporters, because those home supporters have member cards and want to come back.
So as the club have to be seen to be doing something to enforce the rules, it's a no-brainer for them to be doing this in the way which is the most visible and the most effective, as required by RBC and the FLA.
The real mystery is why it's different at away grounds - I suspect it's because our supporters have such a good reputation and because so few stand or misbehave that they are easily dealt with.
Didn't we warn another club that if their fans persist with standing, they would be allocated fewer tickets next time?
by Deathy » 13 Oct 2008 09:53
by retro_royal » 13 Oct 2008 12:23
by Deathy » 13 Oct 2008 12:35
by STAR Liaison » 13 Oct 2008 15:02
Rev Algenon Stickleback HDirk Gently Always remember that the club don't actually want to enforce the "no standing" rule - it causes hassle and conflict an makes it unpleasant for both supporters and stewards. They are forced to be seen to be enforcing these rules by the outside agencies already mentioned.
Does anybody really check?
Given that there have been people standing in Y25/Y26 at pretty much every game since the stadium opened, and nobody yet seems to have complained, I don't get the impression we are in imminent danger of having any punishment imposed on us because a couple of dozen fans stand up up a bit too much.
by Silver Fox » 14 Oct 2008 09:44
Deathy Making a point of staring up at the top of Y25
by retro_royal » 14 Oct 2008 12:04
Deathy F**k off newbie
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 65 guests