by readingbedding » 06 Dec 2008 22:05
by Pablo » 06 Dec 2008 23:07
winchester_royal Like no one else has ever been proven wrong.......
Like everyone else thought Gunnar would have a positive effect......
I am more than happy to be proven wrong, but I still think in the long term Gunnarsson does not feature.
by AthleticoSpizz » 07 Dec 2008 00:05
make that 4 points actually.SLAMMEDPablowinchester_royal Apparently Gunnar is close to a return.
I'm actually more concerned than pleased., especially given his form last year. He has lost his pace, and is no longer the player he was before, and I am worried he may stint the development of Karacan, and maybe even get in the team ahead of Marek.
Anyone else share these concerns?
Hes only gained us 3 points in our last 2 away gameslol @ his concern
by loyalroyal4life » 07 Dec 2008 00:56
winchester_royal Like no one else has ever been proven wrong.......
Like everyone else thought Gunnar would have a positive effect......
I am more than happy to be proven wrong, but I still think in the long term Gunnarsson does not feature.
by bishbosh92 » 07 Dec 2008 09:22
by brendywendy » 07 Dec 2008 13:48
by Ian Royal » 07 Dec 2008 13:54
by Archie's penalty » 07 Dec 2008 14:21
Ian Royal I like Gunnar a lot, but I think he is best used as a sub, saying that though, you could argue his longevity is stunting the growth of Karacan.
by papereyes » 07 Dec 2008 14:22
by Ian Royal » 07 Dec 2008 14:22
papereyes Take 5 years off Bryn and put them on Karacan and that would be a midfield.
by Archie's penalty » 07 Dec 2008 14:26
by Ian Royal » 07 Dec 2008 14:28
Archie's penalty Karacan is going to be great.
I love his energy, speed, tenacity.
I hope Coppell plays him more as the season reaches it's climax.
I think he fits into the Reading system MUCH better than Matejovsky. In fact I would almost get rid of Matejovsky.
by Archie's penalty » 07 Dec 2008 14:36
Ian RoyalArchie's penalty Karacan is going to be great.
I love his energy, speed, tenacity.
I hope Coppell plays him more as the season reaches it's climax.
I think he fits into the Reading system MUCH better than Matejovsky. In fact I would almost get rid of Matejovsky.
I think Matejovsky has been very screwed over by the relegation. I think Coppell may well have been intending to change our system when he brought him in, but has now decided to stick with the tried and tested formula that we know can get us promoted, which unfortunately he doesn't fit into very well.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 309 guests