by Dirk Gently » 29 Dec 2008 22:30
by Ian Royal » 29 Dec 2008 22:34
Dirk Gently Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
by rabidbee » 29 Dec 2008 22:37
Dirk Gently Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
by Dirk Gently » 29 Dec 2008 22:42
rabidbeeDirk Gently Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
But then, if we have the resources to play fitter players - players who didn't turn out in the earlier game - and the opposition don't, then we have an advantage.
by Southbank Old Boy » 29 Dec 2008 22:54
Dirk GentlyrabidbeeDirk Gently Of course it does make a difference to performance. But as long as the opposition have had them same reduced recovery time it shouldn't give an advantage/disadvantage, as long as there isn't a major fitness difference between the two teams.
But then, if we have the resources to play fitter players - players who didn't turn out in the earlier game - and the opposition don't, then we have an advantage.
Yes, but that advantage is only theoretical beacuse there's a very real danger of either those players not being as good as the ones who are being rested or that the changes to the team disrupts the team and their style of play.
by TFF » 30 Dec 2008 00:59
by winchester_royal » 30 Dec 2008 01:36
by brendywendy » 30 Dec 2008 02:02
by Hoop Blah » 30 Dec 2008 09:29
brendywendy Since ivar and doobs kept their places it looks like rest wasnt the only consideration
by Big Foot » 30 Dec 2008 09:39
That Friday Feeling I let this go on (non stop) for about twenty minutes before I turned around and suggested they put up or shut up and that I didn't appreciate their behaviour in front of my kids.
by Far Canal » 30 Dec 2008 10:42
winchester_royal It's a good point you made to the ignorant tits TFF. If some of our so called fans put their energies into supporting the team rather than whingeing and (in some moronic cases) singing self-abusive songs, then the whole atmosphere would be a hell of a lot better.
by pace=forster » 30 Dec 2008 20:33
WoodleyRoyal i spent the whole bloody game on my feet (despite complaints from behind me) i was about half way down to the right ,trying to get the atmosphere going almoast single handedley, i kept turning round and trying to get people on there feet but was being looked at as is i had shit on my face, top left were good but the support was dire the bloke behind me even said i'd give up its like a morge i just dont understand why our support is so awfull it was christmas a local game and judging by yates in town centre and a pub closer to the ground a fair few of us whwere there early and drinking.
by rabidbee » 04 Jan 2009 04:17
by Dirk Gently » 04 Jan 2009 12:37
rabidbee I finally got around to processing my photos from the match:
by papereyes » 04 Jan 2009 13:23
Users browsing this forum: 72 bus, Google [Bot], Jammy Dodger and 231 guests