by SCIAG » 01 Jan 2009 13:59
by JC » 01 Jan 2009 16:17
The 17 Bus I think JM got it for work we do not even know about, it says charitable work, well the arts are not, and neither is the Academy School, so I think he must do a lot out of the limelight, if so I add my best wishes, if it is for just spending his money, well I have spent all mine, all I got is debts.
by Sun Tzu » 01 Jan 2009 16:22
The 17 Bus I think JM got it for work we do not even know about, it says charitable work, well the arts are not, and neither is the Academy School, so I think he must do a lot out of the limelight, if so I add my best wishes, if it is for just spending his money, well I have spent all mine, all I got is debts.
by Man Friday » 01 Jan 2009 16:45
Ian Royal Reading FC isn't a money making venture, and he has put a massive amount back into the community of Reading in developing it into the club it is today.
Add that to the other charitable stuff and the arts.
Yes the honours system is massively open to abuse and tends to go to those at the top with friends in the right places, but it's the best system of recognition for people who do something deserving of reward we have.
If you think you know someone who invests their time in charitable works and helps their community recommend them to your MP to get him / her to try to get them an honour. I'm confident obscure non famous people get them, just not very often, and the names aren't usually publicised very much because no one knows who they are.
by Man Friday » 01 Jan 2009 16:49
Forbury LionOut of interest, How many of these peoples names did you put forward for inclusion in the new years honours list?Man Friday I usually agree with you Floyd but not entirely on this occasion. Whilst not begrudging JM his knighthood the system is rank in that many people spend vast amounts of their (precious) time doing charitable acts - without recognition.
by Sir Rodney Effing » 01 Jan 2009 17:45
Man FridayIan Royal Reading FC isn't a money making venture, and he has put a massive amount back into the community of Reading in developing it into the club it is today.
Add that to the other charitable stuff and the arts.
Yes the honours system is massively open to abuse and tends to go to those at the top with friends in the right places, but it's the best system of recognition for people who do something deserving of reward we have.
If you think you know someone who invests their time in charitable works and helps their community recommend them to your MP to get him / her to try to get them an honour. I'm confident obscure non famous people get them, just not very often, and the names aren't usually publicised very much because no one knows who they are.
"Obscure non famous people" get MBEs which is the lowest in the pecking order - they don't get knighted.
by Millsy » 01 Jan 2009 18:36
by Arch » 01 Jan 2009 18:37
by Ian Royal » 01 Jan 2009 18:44
Man FridayIan Royal Reading FC isn't a money making venture, and he has put a massive amount back into the community of Reading in developing it into the club it is today.
Add that to the other charitable stuff and the arts.
Yes the honours system is massively open to abuse and tends to go to those at the top with friends in the right places, but it's the best system of recognition for people who do something deserving of reward we have.
If you think you know someone who invests their time in charitable works and helps their community recommend them to your MP to get him / her to try to get them an honour. I'm confident obscure non famous people get them, just not very often, and the names aren't usually publicised very much because no one knows who they are.
"Obscure non famous people" get MBEs which is the lowest in the pecking order - they don't get knighted.
by notloyalenuffroyal » 01 Jan 2009 20:23
by Forbury Lion » 01 Jan 2009 20:44
I'm not the one moaning about people not getting recognition.Man FridayForbury LionOut of interest, How many of these peoples names did you put forward for inclusion in the new years honours list?Man Friday I usually agree with you Floyd but not entirely on this occasion. Whilst not begrudging JM his knighthood the system is rank in that many people spend vast amounts of their (precious) time doing charitable acts - without recognition.
None, I waste enough time in my life already. How about yourself?
by Rax » 01 Jan 2009 22:38
notloyalenuffroyal John Madejski's magic
He wears a magic hat
and when he saw a knighthood
he said I'm having that!
He went down to the Palace
Liz said "Rise True Royal!"
He said "Thanks Queen Lizzy,
Now Knight Sir Steve Coppell!"
by Forbury Lion » 02 Jan 2009 17:35
The media only tend to focus on those that the public will be interested in, that means already famous people and the x factor sob story style heart string pullers, who tend to be the lower awards. Anyone who is dull as ditchwater yet gets a knighthood probably won't get much of a write up.Ian RoyalMan FridayIan Royal Reading FC isn't a money making venture, and he has put a massive amount back into the community of Reading in developing it into the club it is today.
Add that to the other charitable stuff and the arts.
Yes the honours system is massively open to abuse and tends to go to those at the top with friends in the right places, but it's the best system of recognition for people who do something deserving of reward we have.
If you think you know someone who invests their time in charitable works and helps their community recommend them to your MP to get him / her to try to get them an honour. I'm confident obscure non famous people get them, just not very often, and the names aren't usually publicised very much because no one knows who they are.
"Obscure non famous people" get MBEs which is the lowest in the pecking order - they don't get knighted.
what rubbish.
by RichieBowman » 02 Jan 2009 18:23
floyd__streeteRichieBowman Oh a Multi millionaire is given a knight hood for doing charity work what a load of rubbish. There are millions of people in the country who do far more than that ego and are given no recognition. Everything Madejski has done is driven by self promotion why else would he name a football ground and art galleries after himself.
Madejski has most likely donated more money to charitable acts in his time than you could most likely ever dream of earning in a lifetime. So what if schools/galleries/stadia are named after him? The important thing is surely the fact that he has sponsored civic services and amenities, putting his hand in his pocket to make a difference. His legacy will live long after he dies; who will remember you when you die I wonder?
Still, you are welcome to your contrary point of view, however ignorant.
by PEARCEY » 02 Jan 2009 18:32
by Negative_Jeff » 02 Jan 2009 19:32
by Gordons Cumming » 02 Jan 2009 19:42
by Elm Park Old Boy » 02 Jan 2009 21:51
by rabidbee » 03 Jan 2009 00:29
RichieBowman He is also a benefactor to the Royal Academy of Arts in Piccadilly, London and in 2004 had the John Madejski Fine Rooms at Burlington House named after him in recognition of a contribution of £3 million to the institution. A sculpture by Edgar Degas, La Petite Danseuse de Quatorze Ans, he purchased at Sotheby's in 2004 is also on display in the John Madejski Fine Rooms. The John Madejski Centre for Reputation at Henley Management College, the new garden at the Victoria and Albert Museum, a lecture theatre at the University of Reading and a gallery at the Museum of Reading also bear his name. He has recently contributed to the running of Thamesbridge College, Reading, which re-opened in September 2006 under the new name of the John Madejski Academy.
by Pseud O'Nym » 03 Jan 2009 02:47
rabidbee Well, speaking as somebody who works in the heritage sector, I don't see what's wrong with that. It costs nothing to put somebody's name on the door
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot], stealthpapes and 246 guests