RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

353 posts
loyalroyal4life
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5595
Joined: 15 May 2007 11:58

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by loyalroyal4life » 05 Jan 2009 14:35

Hoop Blah
loyalroyal4life why we even bothering to go for him IF he reportedly turned us down cos of his wage demands!!!? does hammond think a credit crunch will help reduce his demands....


Was that why the deal fell through then?

We might've changed our mind on what he's worth to us (wages wise) for a number reasons.

1) Hunt is going to be off so we need a replacement
2) Hunt is off so we have room on our wage bill for him
3) He's impressed a lot over the last few months for us to feel he's worth the extra cash
4) We look well set for promotion and so the finances will look better in 6 months time than if we'd struggled
5) If we go up we're going to need better players and that means paying more money



Yeah apparently he was after £17k!!! I think he would be decent replacement for Hunt at less than half his value, but i just cant see this one happening

User avatar
Hoop Blah
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 13937
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 09:00
Location: I told you so.....

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Hoop Blah » 05 Jan 2009 18:15

loyalroyal4life
Hoop Blah
loyalroyal4life why we even bothering to go for him IF he reportedly turned us down cos of his wage demands!!!? does hammond think a credit crunch will help reduce his demands....


Was that why the deal fell through then?

We might've changed our mind on what he's worth to us (wages wise) for a number reasons.

1) Hunt is going to be off so we need a replacement
2) Hunt is off so we have room on our wage bill for him
3) He's impressed a lot over the last few months for us to feel he's worth the extra cash
4) We look well set for promotion and so the finances will look better in 6 months time than if we'd struggled
5) If we go up we're going to need better players and that means paying more money



Yeah apparently he was after £17k!!! I think he would be decent replacement for Hunt at less than half his value, but i just cant see this one happening


Really? That's the first I've heard of that rumour and I have to admit I find it a bit hard to believe. If it's true it might be a good reason why he's still there.

gazzer, loyal royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1935
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 21:45
Location: Khalifa Cisse sleeps with the light on, not because he is afraid of the dark, but because the dark i

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by gazzer, loyal royal » 05 Jan 2009 20:55

it was 18k a week, excluding bonuses dependent on appearances and promotion, hence why we got Armstrong straight after

User avatar
Coppell's Right Footed 11
Member
Posts: 491
Joined: 14 Feb 2005 16:47
Location: Chieveley

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Coppell's Right Footed 11 » 05 Jan 2009 21:17

gazzer, loyal royal it was 18k a week, excluding bonuses dependent on appearances and promotion, hence why we got Armstrong straight after


How do you seem to have the information on every player and their contract demands?

Royalwaster
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3629
Joined: 13 Jul 2004 13:32

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Royalwaster » 05 Jan 2009 21:21

Easy - when you offer to buy someone in FM, their contract demands come up on the screen!


User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Southbank Old Boy » 05 Jan 2009 21:48

Considering the company he keeps in the U21s and that his next move probably needs to be the one that really takes him onto the next level and properly launches his career those numbers dont sound massively out

Our top earners will be on wages somewhere around that and he'll be one of our record signings, so perhaps he was looking for top whack within our squad

gazzer, loyal royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1935
Joined: 18 Jul 2004 21:45
Location: Khalifa Cisse sleeps with the light on, not because he is afraid of the dark, but because the dark i

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by gazzer, loyal royal » 06 Jan 2009 08:41

Coppell's Right Footed 11
gazzer, loyal royal it was 18k a week, excluding bonuses dependent on appearances and promotion, hence why we got Armstrong straight after


How do you seem to have the information on every player and their contract demands?


I won't say on here how i know, but a few nobbers i've met face to face know

loyalroyal4life
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5595
Joined: 15 May 2007 11:58

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by loyalroyal4life » 06 Jan 2009 11:01

gazzer, loyal royal
Coppell's Right Footed 11
gazzer, loyal royal it was 18k a week, excluding bonuses dependent on appearances and promotion, hence why we got Armstrong straight after


How do you seem to have the information on every player and their contract demands?


I won't say on here how i know, but a few nobbers i've met face to face know



well i think they should of given him something like £12k with the incentive of an increase based on us achieving promotion!!

User avatar
Chuckle Brother
Member
Posts: 574
Joined: 11 May 2006 09:50

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Chuckle Brother » 06 Jan 2009 11:24

If he was/is after 17-18k, I'm pretty sure he will be after that with bonuses on top.

Not 17-18k all in.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Ian Royal » 06 Jan 2009 15:14

loyalroyal4life
gazzer, loyal royal
Coppell's Right Footed 11 How do you seem to have the information on every player and their contract demands?


I won't say on here how i know, but a few nobbers i've met face to face know



well i think they should of given him something like £12k with the incentive of an increase based on us achieving promotion!!


I imagine he wanted (if true) £17k/£18k with the incentives of increases based on us getting promotion. You don't talk someone down by £6k a week at this level, just not going to happen.

Tommy Youlden's Ears
Member
Posts: 516
Joined: 01 Nov 2007 12:54

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 11 Jan 2009 03:46

Met a bloke in bar in Las Vegas, like you do. Turns out his son's a S'Hampton academy boy. He started to tell me how messy the club's finances are, and that they'd be selling heavily. Listed Lallana to Spurs and Surman to Reading. Made it sound like deals pretty much agreed. Might be the old rumours, cos only an academy player. But...

User avatar
The whole year inn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 2474
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 16:49
Location: Fred West >>>> Brendan Rodgers

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by The whole year inn » 11 Jan 2009 06:14

Tommy Youlden's Ears Met a bloke in bar in Las Vegas, like you do.


cLOLassic :lol: :lol:

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by FiNeRaIn » 11 Jan 2009 10:15

loyalroyal4life
Hoop Blah
loyalroyal4life why we even bothering to go for him IF he reportedly turned us down cos of his wage demands!!!? does hammond think a credit crunch will help reduce his demands....


Was that why the deal fell through then?

We might've changed our mind on what he's worth to us (wages wise) for a number reasons.

1) Hunt is going to be off so we need a replacement
2) Hunt is off so we have room on our wage bill for him
3) He's impressed a lot over the last few months for us to feel he's worth the extra cash
4) We look well set for promotion and so the finances will look better in 6 months time than if we'd struggled
5) If we go up we're going to need better players and that means paying more money



Yeah apparently he was after £17k!!! I think he would be decent replacement for Hunt at less than half his value, but i just cant see this one happening


17k is fvk all, if this is true, reading's transfer policy really is an absolute joke, you can see why no proven players want to come here, we are still stuck in the 1950's.


User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Ian Royal » 11 Jan 2009 14:39

Knob.

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by FiNeRaIn » 11 Jan 2009 14:43

Ian Royal Knob.


another great contribution from ian royal.

17k for a top championship player- OMG outrageous, what is football coming too?

User avatar
Royal With Cheese
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5701
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 07:45
Location: location location

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Royal With Cheese » 11 Jan 2009 15:00

FiNeRaIn
Ian Royal Knob.


another great contribution from ian royal.

17k for a top championship player- OMG outrageous, what is football coming too?

I thank that's a fair transfer price.

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Ian Royal » 11 Jan 2009 16:48

Given Sidwell was on about £12k last time we were in the championship and was winning recognition as one of the top 5 players, £17k is very definitely not feck all in the championship.

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 11 Jan 2009 17:04

Ian Royal Given Sidwell was on about £12k last time we were in the championship and was winning recognition as one of the top 5 players, £17k is very definitely not feck all in the championship.


You may have walked into a whoosh there.

17k... transfer price...

SCIAG
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6422
Joined: 17 Jun 2008 17:43
Location: Liburd for England

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by SCIAG » 11 Jan 2009 17:09

Deathy
Ian Royal Given Sidwell was on about £12k last time we were in the championship and was winning recognition as one of the top 5 players, £17k is very definitely not feck all in the championship.


You may have walked into a whoosh there.

17k... transfer price...

No, but you have.

Whoosh.

Deathy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3998
Joined: 01 Sep 2008 08:45

Re: RUMOUR - Andrew Surman

by Deathy » 11 Jan 2009 17:12

SCIAG
Deathy
Ian Royal Given Sidwell was on about £12k last time we were in the championship and was winning recognition as one of the top 5 players, £17k is very definitely not feck all in the championship.


You may have walked into a whoosh there.

17k... transfer price...

No, but you have.

Whoosh.


Not following Royal With Cheese's post I'm not.

353 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot] and 35 guests

It is currently 20 Sep 2024 03:26