Arch Well, anyway, I'm pretty much done with this thread. Might as well sum up my analysis of it - since all 76 pages are replete with drivel I feel entitled to dump one last effluence into it.
After we lost to Ipswich we had 7 point from five games and had been well beaten twice (albeit by teams who were sure to be "there or thereabouts" this season ). There were broadly three ways things could go: we could get worse and end up in a relegation scrap; we could muck along in mid-table mediocrity; we could improve and get into the promotion mix. Schards could not see the latter without a "sea change". As it happens (as it's happened before), modest adjustments were all that were required to bring the team together and rise above the dross. So his vision was wrong - no need to apogise (which is just silly) and up to him whether he admits it. There's been a good amount of goalpost moving about what constitutes progress, but surely in the context it meant getting to regular winning ways, being one of the best in the division and competing for promotion.
I think the reason the thread has lasted is because it became symbolic. Apart from 05-06 and to some extent 06-07, there have always been people on the board who insisted the Madejski-Coppell business approach was wrong and doomed, and people who saw a long-term trend in every reverse - the STGs. Part of being an RTG is keeping the faith when things go badly. So this thread became about vindicated faith for many people.
And thus endeth the lesson.
With regular summaries like this this thread could become the new Mikeharps Hottie thread!