by Thames » 15 Jan 2009 14:24
by winchester_royal » 15 Jan 2009 14:29
ThamesOLLIE KEARNSThames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.
Thames, tell us why he isn't good enough. What is he lacking that a Prem keeper has ? Marcus was a prem keeper so maybe compare the two and tell us where Fed comes up short in your opinion.
Man Utd @ home in the Cup replay. Shocking performance.
by Thames » 15 Jan 2009 14:31
winchester_royal Bravo. Bring up a single performance that happened two years ago. I wonder why your debating skills aren't acknowleged more on HNA?......
by westongeezer » 15 Jan 2009 14:36
Thames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.
by OLLIE KEARNS » 15 Jan 2009 14:37
ThamesOLLIE KEARNSThames He's not good enough for the Prem. We should sign a Premiership quality keeper now otherwise it will be more dissapointment for this football club.
Thames, tell us why he isn't good enough. What is he lacking that a Prem keeper has ? Marcus was a prem keeper so maybe compare the two and tell us where Fed comes up short in your opinion.
Man Utd @ home in the Cup replay. Shocking performance.
by winchester_royal » 15 Jan 2009 14:41
Thameswinchester_royal Bravo. Bring up a single performance that happened two years ago. I wonder why your debating skills aren't acknowleged more on HNA?......
Maybe because I'm on a windup?
FTR, I think Federici is a much better goalkeeper than Hahnemann and will only get better.
Regards,
Thames.
by Hoop Blah » 15 Jan 2009 14:43
by Franchise FC » 15 Jan 2009 14:48
Hoop Blah Previously I haven't been impressed with Federici.
I've thought that he conceeded goals that you expect a top draw keeper to save. He seemed to make rash decisions, get himself in the wrong position, and too often make it a bit too easy for the attacker to score.
He also didn't look to command his area any better than Marcus who has always been pulled up for not dominating enough when the ball has come into the box (apart from one-on-one's where he is very imposing and makes regular saves by standing up as long as possible).
I have to admit that Federici has done very little wrong during this spell in the side but, although he's looked very solid, I'm still a little weary as he's not really had a lot to do.
by rabidbee » 15 Jan 2009 15:03
by rhroyal » 15 Jan 2009 15:09
by Thaumagurist* » 15 Jan 2009 15:11
rhroyal I have to say that's one thing we haven't seen from Fedders, the ability to keep us in the game if the opposition are better.
by Millsy » 15 Jan 2009 15:13
by Henleyensian » 15 Jan 2009 15:20
rhroyal I have to say that's one thing we haven't seen from Fedders, the ability to keep us in the game if the opposition are better. Last season Marcus had some dodgy games, but he was brilliant at the 0-0 against Man Utd, he kept us within a fighting chance with the home game against Fulham and made some crucial sames in close games. In games we lost comfortably he often stopped it from becoming embarrassing, like West Ham at home.
by SLAMMED » 15 Jan 2009 15:23
ThamesSteveRoyalThames Next week then.
Positivity isn't your thing, is it?
Not when we're talking about Reading FC son.
by Hoop Blah » 15 Jan 2009 15:30
Thaumagurist*rhroyal I have to say that's one thing we haven't seen from Fedders, the ability to keep us in the game if the opposition are better.
He played in our 3-1 win over Birmingham
by SteveRoyal » 15 Jan 2009 17:41
by bishbosh92 » 15 Jan 2009 17:48
by Dirk Gently » 15 Jan 2009 17:52
by who are ya? » 15 Jan 2009 17:57
by winchester_royal » 15 Jan 2009 18:02
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 211 guests