by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 28 Jan 2009 12:32
by Vision » 28 Jan 2009 12:33
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Thought tactically, Coppell was right on the button -
Wolves success this season has centred on Jarvis. Ebanks 'Blake and Kightly working as a unit. Kightly was totally snuffed out of game, and without him despite Jarvis having some success first half, it took the wheels of the way they like to operate.
They are far less effective if you can nail one of the wingers and stop the supply, which Coppell succeeded in doing
by Hoop Blah » 28 Jan 2009 12:37
BR2 I thought we were much the better side in the first half but might have gone in at 1-1 if Keogh hadn't missed a sitter.
by brendywendy » 28 Jan 2009 12:43
by BR2 » 28 Jan 2009 12:48
Hoop BlahBR2 I thought we were much the better side in the first half but might have gone in at 1-1 if Keogh hadn't missed a sitter.
It was flagged for offside anyway.
by Blue&White Mage » 28 Jan 2009 12:58
by Negative_Jeff » 28 Jan 2009 13:03
VisionIMAMATEOFJOVSKY Thought tactically, Coppell was right on the button -
Wolves success this season has centred on Jarvis. Ebanks 'Blake and Kightly working as a unit. Kightly was totally snuffed out of game, and without him despite Jarvis having some success first half, it took the wheels of the way they like to operate.
They are far less effective if you can nail one of the wingers and stop the supply, which Coppell succeeded in doing
I thought to a certain extent Mccarthy did that for him. They seemed so keen to "get at" Kelly that they appeared to forget all about the rest of the pitch.
by winchester_royal » 28 Jan 2009 13:22
by Woodcote Royal » 28 Jan 2009 13:31
brendywendy To whoever thought we were awful. We managed to dominate the first half,till doobs went,then successfully shut out the game in the second.the thing that makes it so impressive was that it was vs their strongest side,and ours consisted of a third choice child rb.a 20 year old 4th choice cb, a midfielder who wont head the ball at cb. And an old man at cm. Its no wonder we werent totally fluent was it.
by Tommy Youlden's Ears » 28 Jan 2009 13:46
by winchester_royal » 28 Jan 2009 13:50
Tommy Youlden's Ears Love Boris - as a club man, a trier and what appears to be decent bloke. But thought last night that he looked very old.
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2009 14:00
IMAMATEOFJOVSKY Thought tactically, Coppell was right on the button -
Wolves success this season has centred on Jarvis. Ebanks 'Blake and Kightly working as a unit. Kightly was totally snuffed out of game, and without him despite Jarvis having some success first half, it took the wheels of the way they like to operate.
They are far less effective if you can nail one of the wingers and stop the supply, which Coppell succeeded in doing
by Dirk Gently » 28 Jan 2009 14:03
Negative_JeffVisionIMAMATEOFJOVSKY Thought tactically, Coppell was right on the button -
Wolves success this season has centred on Jarvis. Ebanks 'Blake and Kightly working as a unit. Kightly was totally snuffed out of game, and without him despite Jarvis having some success first half, it took the wheels of the way they like to operate.
They are far less effective if you can nail one of the wingers and stop the supply, which Coppell succeeded in doing
I thought to a certain extent Mccarthy did that for him. They seemed so keen to "get at" Kelly that they appeared to forget all about the rest of the pitch.
I agree with this. Twice I have seen Wolves now and they are all pace and power and don`t play as much as us.
Birmingham keep bringing in new players and don`t play well. I cannot believe that McLeish knows what his best side is.
It`s looking good for Reading because although the best footballing side in the division, Swansea, are in a rich vein of form they have a lot of ground to make up.
by StevenKelliher » 28 Jan 2009 14:17
Row Z RoyalDirk GentlyRow Z Royal Just seen the sending off...still think it's harsh.
You can lipread?
No, but his outburst was brief so I dread to think what he said to the lino. If it'd had been the full hair dryer treatment then it would have made more sense. Oh well.
by Deadlock » 28 Jan 2009 14:23
Blue&White Mage I'm guessing it was just me who thought the guy who tried to steal Kebe's shirt in the first half deserved a red, as no one else seems to have mentioned it. I thought the ref was shocking in parts and only seemed to start giving us decisions after he was bowled over by a wolves player
by Maguire » 28 Jan 2009 14:24
Dirk GentlyOLLIE KEARNSZacNaloen If Pearce isn't a future Reading captain and defensive legend in the future then I'll eat my hat.
Kelly I thought did his job well, Jarvis was mostly ineffectual and once he was taken off Kelly was allowed to go forward and we saw the excellent attacking abilities.
Jarvis was their only effective player ! Got behind Kelly two or three times in the first half and should have scored in the second half. Kelly did okay against a good player but no more than that.
I's say that Kelly started a little nervous (understandably) and so was a little shaky in the first half-hour.
But after that his confidence and composure visibly grew so that in the second half there were no signs he was so new.
by readingbedding » 28 Jan 2009 14:25
by LoyalRoyalFan » 28 Jan 2009 14:36
by Hoop Blah » 28 Jan 2009 14:36
DeadlockBlue&White Mage I'm guessing it was just me who thought the guy who tried to steal Kebe's shirt in the first half deserved a red, as no one else seems to have mentioned it. I thought the ref was shocking in parts and only seemed to start giving us decisions after he was bowled over by a wolves player
Certainly a case for Ward to be sent off there. What I thought was bizarre was in the second half when another Wolves player committed the same offence on NHunt we only got a free kick. There was also the bit where a Wolves player launched himself at Boris, which the ref initially gave us a free kick for, only to change his mind when he realised the Wolf had injured himself!?
I enjoyed the bit where the two Wolves players head-butted each other. Didn't enjoy missing the goal because I was one of the 200 or so still queueing at Gate 7 to get in.
by facaldaqui » 28 Jan 2009 14:37
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 207 guests