by Royal Rother » 30 Jan 2009 11:55
by AlexY25 » 30 Jan 2009 11:59
by bishbosh92 » 30 Jan 2009 12:02
by Archie's penalty » 30 Jan 2009 12:04
by CMRoyal » 30 Jan 2009 12:04
Royal Rother I'm bored with all the speculation now. Our squad is a lot stronger than people give it credit for and the absence of supposedly key players has generally made bugger all difference; our fringe players have always stepped up and done a great job and now could be the time for them to really show their mettle.
Harper and Shunt might be the most energetic within the usual starting 11 but they are not the be all and end all. We have players waiting in the wings who are ready and able - the supposed adversity in their departure will create a great atmosphere on match days as the fans really get behind the team.
Bring it on!
Royal Rother ]And yes, bored of is perfectly acceptable these days so feck off ancient grammar pedants.
by Archie's penalty » 30 Jan 2009 12:06
CMRoyalRoyal Rother I'm bored with all the speculation now. Our squad is a lot stronger than people give it credit for and the absence of supposedly key players has generally made bugger all difference; our fringe players have always stepped up and done a great job and now could be the time for them to really show their mettle.
Harper and Shunt might be the most energetic within the usual starting 11 but they are not the be all and end all. We have players waiting in the wings who are ready and able - the supposed adversity in their departure will create a great atmosphere on match days as the fans really get behind the team.
Bring it on!
'greed. It'll be good to see Jem build on his good work earlier in the season.Royal Rother ]And yes, bored of is perfectly acceptable these days so feck off ancient grammar pedants.
Saying "fcuk" on the bus in front of old ladies, drinking beer out of bottles instead of a glass, and covering your body with unsightly tattoos and piercings seem to be acceptable these days. too. Doesn't make them any less ugly.
by West Stand Man » 30 Jan 2009 12:06
CMRoyalRoyal Rother
'greed. It'll be good to see Jem build on his good work earlier in the season.Royal Rother ]And yes, bored of is perfectly acceptable these days so feck off ancient grammar pedants.
Saying "fcuk" on the bus in front of old ladies, drinking beer out of bottles instead of a glass, and covering your body with unsightly tattoos and piercings seem to be acceptable these days. too. Doesn't make them any less ugly.
by Einstein agogo » 30 Jan 2009 12:11
by Matt de K » 30 Jan 2009 12:17
by Alan Partridge » 30 Jan 2009 12:19
by Schards#2 » 30 Jan 2009 12:21
by Archie's penalty » 30 Jan 2009 12:25
Schards#2 I'd like to see some certainty one way or the other before Saturday as it can only be unsettling as both players are likely to play.
by Ian Royal » 30 Jan 2009 12:27
by Forbury Lion » 30 Jan 2009 12:30
These things he does, Can one of our other midfielders not do this also?bishbosh92 S.Hunt out i hope Harps stays though he still does alot for the team!
by Ian Royal » 30 Jan 2009 12:32
Forbury LionThese things he does, Can one of our other midfielders not do this also?bishbosh92 S.Hunt out i hope Harps stays though he still does alot for the team!
by juanpablo » 30 Jan 2009 12:34
by andrew1957 » 30 Jan 2009 12:34
Alan Partridge Rother we agree again!!
Harper can be replaced by either a better footballer in Matejovsky orthe younger version of him in Karacan and reading will carry on as normal. I don't see losing Harper as any sort of loss to be honest. He'll go with everyone's blessing after 8 years of service but there is nothing about his game that can't be replaced or improved on when he goes. What we lose in Harper we will gain in either Marek or Karacan.
As for Hunt I would like a replacement of good quality, a Campbell Ryce or a Surman. Different types of players but both naturally wide players that would give us something different. Again we'd miss Hunt's set pieces, we'd miss his enrgy and commitment. But we'd add more quality from open play in Surman or we'd add more pace and trickery in Campbell Ryce.
We'd make tidy profits on both having had their best years, they'd get their moves and RFC can move on. I would have no problem with either or in lots of ways preferably both leaving. The only person Reading can't replace is Doyle, they keep him and they'll be fine.
by Millsy » 30 Jan 2009 12:39
Royal Rother the supposed adversity in their departure will create a great atmosphere on match days as the fans really get behind the team.
by Royal With Cheese » 30 Jan 2009 12:40
Alan Partridge Harper can be replaced by either a better footballer in Matejovsky orthe younger version of him in Karacan and reading will carry on as normal.
by Focher » 30 Jan 2009 12:45
Users browsing this forum: Biscuit goalie, Keysfield and 244 guests