by Carlos » 31 Jan 2009 23:49
by Royal-DLG » 01 Feb 2009 00:27
EastStander i was dissapointed by the fans aroud me/us. Started numerous chants only no one was bothered to join in. Feel a bit let down, was in the upper towards the back and even though everyone stood thought out, no one wanted to sing.
by Sussex exile » 01 Feb 2009 00:38
by Tacano » 01 Feb 2009 01:05
by SLAMMED » 01 Feb 2009 01:44
by Thomas L'Heureux » 01 Feb 2009 01:54
Sussex exile Oh how fun today was, my seat was exceptional the tin-pot ground decided to rain on me (or someone in the upper tier decided to have a slash or spilled a drink) here's to hoping it was just a leak The game overall was quite average thought we cancelled each other out really, Was amazed Kebe wasn't brought off earlier he really was shocking and bottling out of a header....Hopefully he's benched on sat or dropped completely!
Leroy had a good game was all over the pitch getting stuck in and chasing nothing balls, Doobs as usual solid.
All in all a fun day out despite the "leak" and the shockingly SLOW service getting a beer at H/T our lot could do a quicker job
by Jackson Corner » 01 Feb 2009 02:04
by readingbedding » 01 Feb 2009 08:16
by Ashfordroyal » 01 Feb 2009 09:25
SLAMMEDwillz_royal BOOOBS.
What a boring game. Fans in lower Z3 were on form. And Winchester royal was wearing a lovely hat.
I was down there too. You see the old couple who moved after the first 10 minutes.
Boring game today. Birmingham scored a 93rd minute equaliser against wednesday as well
Pictures:
by Royal Lady » 01 Feb 2009 09:30
by The 17 Bus » 01 Feb 2009 09:56
by Irvinchangeyaname » 01 Feb 2009 10:01
by OLLIE KEARNS » 01 Feb 2009 10:26
readingbedding It was a flat performance but you have to give QPR some credit for that, it's a tight old pitch at Loftus Road, and QPR flooded their midfield and kept their 4-5-1 all the way through the match, their Midfielders worked very hard to close us down, to rush us and deny us space, and their centre-backs played well.
In fact, QPR have a great record against the top sides in this division and their tactics gave us a clue why...
Perhaps, if QPR played 4-4-2 or changed the tactics rather than subs coming on like for like, it would have opened the match for them, indeed some QPR mates I chatted to felt that we were there for the taking if they had done so.
Who knows.
Anyway, Reading lacked that bit of quality, composure and guile to break down the puzzle offered by QPR and the performance from the team as a result led to the wrong option, silly mistakes and all round ineffective team performance.
On the upside, defensively another clean sheet, Fed is really looking like the number 1 and Doyle and Lita laboured, but never gave up for that ONE CHANCE with the scraps fed to them.
But the midfield really strugged to get a grip, just didn't happen today and it frustrated many fans looking for their rightful victory on what seemed to be their big day out...
I'm very pragmatic about it all, credit to QPR, nevermind RFC, we didn't lose.
by moo » 01 Feb 2009 10:29
Irvinchangeyaname What exactly were the stewards trying to achieve by blocking off people getting back into lower Z3 at half time?
by Gunny Fishcake » 01 Feb 2009 10:40
by readingbedding » 01 Feb 2009 11:16
OLLIE KEARNSreadingbedding It was a flat performance but you have to give QPR some credit for that, it's a tight old pitch at Loftus Road, and QPR flooded their midfield and kept their 4-5-1 all the way through the match, their Midfielders worked very hard to close us down, to rush us and deny us space, and their centre-backs played well.
In fact, QPR have a great record against the top sides in this division and their tactics gave us a clue why...
Perhaps, if QPR played 4-4-2 or changed the tactics rather than subs coming on like for like, it would have opened the match for them, indeed some QPR mates I chatted to felt that we were there for the taking if they had done so.
Who knows.
Anyway, Reading lacked that bit of quality, composure and guile to break down the puzzle offered by QPR and the performance from the team as a result led to the wrong option, silly mistakes and all round ineffective team performance.
On the upside, defensively another clean sheet, Fed is really looking like the number 1 and Doyle and Lita laboured, but never gave up for that ONE CHANCE with the scraps fed to them.
But the midfield really strugged to get a grip, just didn't happen today and it frustrated many fans looking for their rightful victory on what seemed to be their big day out...
I'm very pragmatic about it all, credit to QPR, nevermind RFC, we didn't lose.
Interesting to think of it from QPR fans perspective. If my team played 4-5-1 at home I'd be okay with it so long as the spare man played off the front man. To play the spare man (Mahon) in front of the back four would drive me nuts. Especially on such a narrow pitch when 4 can cover the space of 5 in any case.
But, the QPR fans are probably right in that we'd have won against 4-4-2 (look what happened when Watford changed to 4-4-2) and I'm afraid we're just going to have to put up with it for the rest of the season. Our CM will never look good in 3 v 2 (as would be the case for any other team), our wide men will be denied space constantly and we'll see lot's of hoofball.
BUT...not many sides are going to score against us with 4-5-1 and we're capable of nicking goals to win games. So, promotion beckons but it won't be pretty !!
by glass half full » 01 Feb 2009 11:39
by royalguy » 01 Feb 2009 11:45
by S09Royal » 01 Feb 2009 11:47
by moo » 01 Feb 2009 12:20
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 279 guests