by Southbank Old Boy » 31 Jan 2009 16:36
by Woodcote Royal » 31 Jan 2009 17:08
by Southbank Old Boy » 31 Jan 2009 17:26
by Royal Rother » 31 Jan 2009 21:26
cmonurzWoodcote Royal When it's involves beating the league leaders 3-0 on their own patch it says a great deal about certain blinkered views here.
Lust like Sidwell before them, Hunt and Harper are replaceable should the need arise..................not that I want this to be the case.
One match. Replacing someone for one game is not replacing them permanently.
Royal RotherSmoking Kills Dancing Doe Cisse/Harper is the only midfield partnership that has really worked this season...
You might be surprised to know that our best run of the season was with Karacan and Gunnarsson.
4-0 Swansea
3-0 Wolves
3-1 Burnley
We then annihilated Preston away in the 1st half only to lose 2-1 in the end because the strikers didn't convert the chances created....
by KC Royal » 02 Feb 2009 15:34
Hoop Blah I'll be sad to see Harper go, if he does.
He's been such a key figure in all that we've achieved in the Pardew and Coppell era's and it's a shame that so many people don't appreciate the selfless work he puts in week-in week-out. I also imagine that he's a key voice and character in the dressing room and out on the pitch and he sums up our hard work ethic and never say die hard work and spirit.
In Karacan we have a pretty similar player, but Harpers drive and experience will be invaluable during the run in and I hope we don't miss him as much as I expect we might.
Hunt can go, not too fussed about that one as he's over rated and is seriously getting on my tits over the last few months.
by juanpablo » 02 Feb 2009 17:04
by Horsham Royal » 02 Feb 2009 17:16
juanpablo awww poor old Stevie nobody wants him
by Huntley & Palmer » 02 Feb 2009 17:19
Woodcote RoyalHuntley & Palmer Two of our most experienced midfielders, both with Premiership seasons under their belt. To be honest, I am surprised that we have kept them this long and I think most people won't realise how much they contribute until they have gone.
Would leave us with a central midfield of Boris, Matejovsky, Cisse and Karacan. One is near the end of his career with another at the very birth of his in this league let alone one up and the other two struggled to produce the goods in the Premiership.
Yet we produced our best result of the season, at Molineax, with a central midfield of Karacan and Gunnarsson.............................
by readingbedding » 02 Feb 2009 18:28
by Woodcote Royal » 02 Feb 2009 18:50
Huntley & PalmerWoodcote RoyalHuntley & Palmer Two of our most experienced midfielders, both with Premiership seasons under their belt. To be honest, I am surprised that we have kept them this long and I think most people won't realise how much they contribute until they have gone.
Would leave us with a central midfield of Boris, Matejovsky, Cisse and Karacan. One is near the end of his career with another at the very birth of his in this league let alone one up and the other two struggled to produce the goods in the Premiership.
Yet we produced our best result of the season, at Molineax, with a central midfield of Karacan and Gunnarsson.............................
That would be the injury weakened Wolves side, who then picked up further injuries to key players during the game. Gunnar was unable to play a whole season in the Prem due to injuries, he will be older and slower if we get back there again. Jem has promise but playing him week in week out in the Prem would crush him at his age. Oh and that wonder midfield partnership was also together in the loss at Preston and the draw with QPR, it was then split up for the loss at Burnley.
by Ian Royal » 02 Feb 2009 18:52
by Woodcote Royal » 02 Feb 2009 19:07
by TommyF » 02 Feb 2009 20:30
by SteveRoyal » 02 Feb 2009 21:08
Woodcote Royal We lost 3 of our back four in the corresponding fixture and still won 1-0...................I think that's a fair comparison.
by Snowball » 02 Feb 2009 21:36
SteveRoyalWoodcote Royal We lost 3 of our back four in the corresponding fixture and still won 1-0...................I think that's a fair comparison.
Thanks to an OG.
Don't get me wrong, the defence was superb - but we won thanks to an OG.
by Southbank Old Boy » 02 Feb 2009 21:44
SnowballSteveRoyalWoodcote Royal We lost 3 of our back four in the corresponding fixture and still won 1-0...................I think that's a fair comparison.
Thanks to an OG.
Don't get me wrong, the defence was superb - but we won thanks to an OG.
No we didn't. We won because we were the better side, and because there was an early OG
we didn't have to find another goal.
But do you forget that their goalie had to make two great saves to keep them in it
and that Federici had to make 99 saves (or was that 1 comfortable one?)
by Amongst the sheep » 02 Feb 2009 22:34
by Woodcote Royal » 02 Feb 2009 23:06
Southbank Old Boy
do you mean the one from Hunts free kick? It was decent but not great, it was straight down the middle of the goal and if that went in he'd have got slated. He made a good save low down at full stretch amongst bodies though. That was a good piece of work, but again, not sure it was great
by The whole year inn » 04 Feb 2009 06:10
by gazzer, loyal royal » 04 Feb 2009 07:40
The whole year inn New contract for S. Hunt, year extension.
Presumably with the release clause removed
http://www.readingchronicle.co.uk/articles/2/9140
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 347 guests