by Barry the bird boggler » 04 Feb 2009 08:07
by Rex » 04 Feb 2009 08:30
by nicks1981 » 04 Feb 2009 09:43
by Royal With Cheese » 04 Feb 2009 10:44
nicks1981 Did Wolves/Birmingham/Cardiff/Sheff Utd look to sell their best players while going for promotion? NO. So why were we linked?
by Alan Partridge » 04 Feb 2009 10:56
Royal With Cheesenicks1981 Did Wolves/Birmingham/Cardiff/Sheff Utd look to sell their best players while going for promotion? NO. So why were we linked?
??
Sheff United sold Beattie.
Wolves lost Mark Davies to Bolton. Although not a Kightly he will be missed. McCarthy was furious.
Cardiff were in a very similar position to ourselves. If a "get out clause" bid had have come in then they would have lost players. The credit crunch has forced teams to look abroad rather than to home based championship players. It's done us a power of good!
Out of those it was clear Birmingham were lacking - they've bought in a lot of players and, basically, haven't so far managed to turn their form around.
by Royal With Cheese » 04 Feb 2009 20:04
Alan PartridgeRoyal With Cheesenicks1981 Did Wolves/Birmingham/Cardiff/Sheff Utd look to sell their best players while going for promotion? NO. So why were we linked?
??
Sheff United sold Beattie.
Wolves lost Mark Davies to Bolton. Although not a Kightly he will be missed. McCarthy was furious.
Cardiff were in a very similar position to ourselves. If a "get out clause" bid had have come in then they would have lost players. The credit crunch has forced teams to look abroad rather than to home based championship players. It's done us a power of good!
Out of those it was clear Birmingham were lacking - they've bought in a lot of players and, basically, haven't so far managed to turn their form around.
But cardiff haven't lost players, despite all the clauses and 'they would have done' they didn't and they added players, good players to their ranks. Wolves have added a good centre half and although they 'lost' Davies he wasn't there anyway because he was out on loan, so it will make zero difference to their season. The only top team that sold anyone wa Sheff Utd because Beattie was on mega money that they couldn't afford anymore with them not guaranteed promotion.
by Ian Royal » 04 Feb 2009 20:10
by Royal With Cheese » 04 Feb 2009 20:20
Ian Royal I thought Cardiff lost Routledge... He was pretty influential for them.
How did they do during the spell without Chopra out of curiosity? How many games was it?
by Ian Royal » 04 Feb 2009 20:25
Royal With CheeseIan Royal I thought Cardiff lost Routledge... He was pretty influential for them.
How did they do during the spell without Chopra out of curiosity? How many games was it?
Routledge was on loan. They did try to either buy or extend. Didn't he end up at QPR? WWAP I believe.
by Royal With Cheese » 04 Feb 2009 20:44
Ian RoyalRoyal With CheeseIan Royal I thought Cardiff lost Routledge... He was pretty influential for them.
How did they do during the spell without Chopra out of curiosity? How many games was it?
Routledge was on loan. They did try to either buy or extend. Didn't he end up at QPR? WWAP I believe.
Yes he was on loan, and yes he went to QPR, but he was still an important part of the team, so regardless of who his contract belonged to, surely his no longer being there has weakened them?
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot], Clyde1998, Royals and Racers and 184 guests