by Agent Balti » 23 Feb 2009 09:38
Huntley & PalmerSnowball Nope, it just counters your unproven opinion. Nah-hah-nah-naaa-nah
Brilliant, the world's first 60+ year old child
by Huntley & Palmer » 23 Feb 2009 09:47
SnowballHuntley & PalmerSnowball Nope, it just counters your unproven opinion. Nah-hah-nah-naaa-nah
Brilliant, the world's first 60+ year old child
Just dropping int HNA-Speak to make a point.
If X says something unfounded, then Y can say the same or oppositie unfounded
It's all bollocks either way
by Negative_Jeff » 23 Feb 2009 09:53
Negative_Jeff Not a popular view I accept, but assuming Bikey is fit we have the personnel to play three at the back particularly as Pearce appears capable when being pulled out left. A lot would depend on Rosenoir as an attacking threat though, much like Gilkes in 1995. If we are up against 4-5-1 so often why not play with a back three? The only time I have seen Coppell use this system was at Spurs away in the Cup last season and we very nearly won.
Ollie Kearns makes an interesting point about Harper and Cisse dropping deep when the team is not in possession. Certainly when Sidwell was here we used to press the opposition higher up the pitch and few teams could use a "quarterback" against us with Kitson`s donkeywork. Has this subtle change come about because Coppell tried to play the same way without adequately replacing these two key players?
by OLLIE KEARNS » 23 Feb 2009 10:26
Snowball The semi-pros on here can put me right but if we are playing
and set up for 4-4-2 and the opposition goes 4-5-1 why can't a CB step up into midfield?
I realise Doobs/Pearce wouldn't be right for that, but what about Bikey?
I ask, because I'd guess Bikey would work well in a 4-4-2 where that happened
Personally I would love to see him in midfield either stepping up or in front of two CBs
If he can avoid a red card he's a ball winner, powerful, can head the ball, can pass a bit, shoot a bit
by OLLIE KEARNS » 23 Feb 2009 11:08
Negative_Jeff Not a popular view I accept, but assuming Bikey is fit we have the personnel to play three at the back particularly as Pearce appears capable when being pulled out left. A lot would depend on Rosenoir as an attacking threat though, much like Gilkes in 1995. If we are up against 4-5-1 so often why not play with a back three? The only time I have seen Coppell use this system was at Spurs away in the Cup last season and we very nearly won.
Ollie Kearns makes an interesting point about Harper and Cisse dropping deep when the team is not in possession. Certainly when Sidwell was here we used to press the opposition higher up the pitch and few teams could use a "quarterback" against us with Kitson`s donkeywork. Has this subtle change come about because Coppell tried to play the same way without adequately replacing these two key players?
by OLLIE KEARNS » 23 Feb 2009 11:31
rg6royal I want to see Bikey come back into the team as we were winning games when he was playing. Don't like the fact that people are suggesting we play someone just infront of the defense as we are a very attack minded team.
by Woodcote Royal » 23 Feb 2009 16:14
Users browsing this forum: Google [Bot], Google Adsense [Bot] and 253 guests