Hard to see any progress for the forseeable future

[Royal Lady]

FTR he doesn't gloat every time we lose. HTH

Key word in bold, so you would agree that sometimes after we lose he likes to gloat?

I was just quoting your wife, take it up with her.

And I was quoting Winchester. HTH.

That's another fallacy that is wearing a bit thin now too! If he WANTED us to lose and be mid-table mediocrity he certainly wouldn't bother to games home and away, let alone buying a fricking season ticket. He WANTS us to do well, as he has for the last 30 odd years. Plank.

Well then perhaps he could stop gloating everytime we lose. Plank indeed.

[The 17 Bus]

Having read the last few pages, it has become my view that perhaps Schards has become bored with football, rather than RFC and how we are doing, as has been pointed out Wolves and brum are doing crap as well.

too many players are just not playing throughout football, Man u have a squad of about 30, in the 70's that would have been 20 ish tops, but now teams need 7 subs, that IMHO means that the Championship is of no higher level than the old third tier.

curent form

http://footballstats.sportinglife.com/d ... oform.html

[Royal With Cheese]

I'm again confused with the constantly moving goalposts.

The title of the thread is "Hard to see any progress for the forseeable future"

We're now talking about our prospects in "The long Term"

I can't argue with such constantly changing logic.

[AthleticoSpizz]

like batting against a government manifesto

[Uke]

Let the thread continue

After all we are third, two points behind Brum and with a game in hand...

[Schards#2]

9 hours without a Reading player scoring.

And counting.

[Arch]

I have to admit that when this thread was first issued, I never thought I'd count progress as scoring a goal, and yet by that measure it is indeed hard to see any progress for the foreseeable future.

[Uke]

Are our loans progress or ambition?

[Royal Lady]

I'd say they could be the start of a sea change at the club, personally. No-one could have foreseen that SSC would resort to getting back Little and Kits on loan til the end of the season - and, if I may play devil's advocate here, SSC must have felt we were going wrong with what we had to even contemplate bringing them back here!

[CMRoyal]

Are our loans progress or ambition?

It's kind of the anticipated fire sale in reverse at the moment, isn't it? Damaged goods, maybe?

[Uke]

I'd say they could be the start of a sea change at the club, personally. No-one could have foreseen that SSC would resort to getting back Little and Kits on loan til the end of the season - and, if I may play devil's advocate here, SSC must have felt we were going wrong with what we had to even contemplate bringing them back here!

Perhap not going wrong - more 'in need of a boost'

You say "potato", I say "tomato"

[Royal Lady]

Why would you say tomato instead of potato??

[Sun Tzu]

Both the deals have been rumoured for weeks, but still surprising they have actually happened.

Do they show that there was anything 'wrong' ? Only if you interpret any transfer on that basis. They potentially add to a very good squad who have already shown that they are getting back to form and if these two do give us a boost towards promotion then they will certainly have helped the club progress - for a second time.

[readingbedding]

FTR he doesn't gloat every time we lose. HTH

Key word in bold, so you would agree that sometimes after we lose he likes to gloat?

Fair point Sir.

[Alan Partridge]

[seahawk10]

[Archie's penalty]

[Royal Lady]

FTR he doesn't gloat every time we lose. HTH

Key word in bold, so you would agree that sometimes after we lose he likes to gloat?

Fair point Sir.

Yes. It would be if I hadn't already stated previously why I said that. Oh. Has Readingbedding posted since Saturday? Or is he too busy planning the PROFLomotion PaROFLty?

[papereyes]

@

[Thaumagurist*]