by Sarah Star » 11 Mar 2009 13:37
by Mad Dog's Ghost » 11 Mar 2009 13:47
by West Stand Man » 11 Mar 2009 13:47
Mad Dog's Ghost They're all average sides in a very average division where there is very little difference in quality between teams at the top and teams at the bottom.
For a team which featured so many players with such poor touch, the early season run was miraculous.
by West Stand Man » 11 Mar 2009 13:51
Mad Dog's Ghost Well, if you think it's great then fine.
It's a very tight division, full of okayish sides. Which is why Charlton didn't really look miles worse than Wolves.
Without seriously major surgery, any side going up will be destroyed in the premiership.
by Sun Tzu » 11 Mar 2009 14:00
hughsies no.1 just a one word or line answer. i have a few ideas:
a) we miss ivar
b) we miss having marcus
c) the home fans
by Wongle » 11 Mar 2009 14:42
by FiNeRaIn » 11 Mar 2009 14:42
floyd__streetehughsies no.1 c) the home fans
LOL
Yeah, blame the fans. Grrr, those bloody fans costing us shoddy goals, curse them and their dire final ball.
by madmickb » 11 Mar 2009 14:44
by Snowball » 11 Mar 2009 14:57
brendywendySnowball It's strange that since January we've brought back three players
all who have seemed to say not-so-good things about Reading FC
and said big things about other clubs
little was nothing but complimentary about us
kitson just said what he thought had contributed to our demise last season
by SteveRoyal » 11 Mar 2009 15:03
The 17 Busstatto you mean the fans who
A) boo off a promotion chasing side at half time
B) Abuse the ball girl for not picking up the ball
C) cheer when players are substituted
D) Moan about every player and say another player who isn't playing should be and then when that player does, moan about them.
You missed the bit about blaming the manager for every single thing.
by Royalee » 11 Mar 2009 15:47
FiNeRaInfloyd__streetehughsies no.1 c) the home fans
LOL
Yeah, blame the fans. Grrr, those bloody fans costing us shoddy goals, curse them and their dire final ball.
lol +1
by brendywendy » 11 Mar 2009 15:53
joe999 whoever said about opposition teams having us worked out is spot on IMO.
We're one of the most predictable teams in the football league at the moment.
A centre back who couldn't kick a ball to save his life, despite his experience
A right back who thinks its acceptable to hoof it aimlessly 50 yards to an opposition defender, when you have one of the best right-wingers in football standing 10 yards from you
A left winger who hasnt put in a decent cross in about 4 months (and look at the difference when Tabb came on yesterday)
A midfield who CONSTANTLY try to play out to the left wing
And on the rare occasion the ball does get in the box, our strikers are so surprised Hunt's actually done something worthwhile, they haven't even bothered getting in there
Spot on mate
by brendywendy » 11 Mar 2009 15:55
Mad Dog's Ghost Well, if you think it's great then fine.
It's a very tight division, full of okayish sides. Which is why Charlton didn't really look miles worse than Wolves.
Without seriously major surgery, any side going up will be destroyed in the premiership.
by Royalee » 11 Mar 2009 16:42
brendywendyjoe999 whoever said about opposition teams having us worked out is spot on IMO.
We're one of the most predictable teams in the football league at the moment.
A centre back who couldn't kick a ball to save his life, despite his experience
A right back who thinks its acceptable to hoof it aimlessly 50 yards to an opposition defender, when you have one of the best right-wingers in football standing 10 yards from you
A left winger who hasnt put in a decent cross in about 4 months (and look at the difference when Tabb came on yesterday)
A midfield who CONSTANTLY try to play out to the left wing
And on the rare occasion the ball does get in the box, our strikers are so surprised Hunt's actually done something worthwhile, they haven't even bothered getting in there
Spot on mate
except that has absolutely nowt to do with anyone working us out, just that these areas have been performing badly
by Scarface » 11 Mar 2009 16:55
by brendywendy » 11 Mar 2009 16:59
Royaleebrendywendyjoe999 whoever said about opposition teams having us worked out is spot on IMO.
We're one of the most predictable teams in the football league at the moment.
A centre back who couldn't kick a ball to save his life, despite his experience
A right back who thinks its acceptable to hoof it aimlessly 50 yards to an opposition defender, when you have one of the best right-wingers in football standing 10 yards from you
A left winger who hasnt put in a decent cross in about 4 months (and look at the difference when Tabb came on yesterday)
A midfield who CONSTANTLY try to play out to the left wing
And on the rare occasion the ball does get in the box, our strikers are so surprised Hunt's actually done something worthwhile, they haven't even bothered getting in there
Spot on mate
except that has absolutely nowt to do with anyone working us out, just that these areas have been performing badly
No, it means teams have worked out how to play against us whereas the didn't know previously. Barely anything's changed in the last 18 months, Coppell's just been found out. LOL, he's even admitted he thinks teams are finding us out.
by seahawk10 » 11 Mar 2009 18:59
West Stand ManSchards#2 The reason for the 'blip' is that we are not a very good football team.
And we would still not be very good if the Charlton equaliser had gone wide instead of going in.
The blip was the freescoring run earlier in the season.
So what about the other teams in this league then? The ones who are nearly all below us in the table and the 2 that are ahead of us having played 2 extra games? What is your view on them, pray tell?
by papereyes » 11 Mar 2009 19:02
Ideal The biggest problem is central midfield. Our weakness there was the reason we got relegated in the first place, and it is showing again.
To play like we want to, 4-4-2 with old style wingers, we need a better midfield than what we have.
People can drone on and on about how much Cissé has improved, that's all fine, but he is not the type of player we need.
We need someone who can run around like a headless chicken all day like Hughes, tackle like Williams and pass like Osborn, and Cissé is pretty far from being that player.
Anytime we discuss how we never replaced Sidwell people start groaning about how expensive it would be to buy him back etc, which is a total dead-end-discussion, and has no meaningful purpouse.
It can't be that hard to find a player who has SIMILAR QUALITIES - it's just a matter of looking around more.
Just like we managed to find Armstrong, who has done a real good job, I think it would be possible to find the player we need if we just tried. I honestly don't think we have made an effort to get a new DMC, we've just resigned to the fact that "we already have Cisse and Gunnarsson and that will be enough", but they aren't good enough for us to get promoted.
It seems to me that mentioning Sidwell in a debate about RFC has the same effect as bringing up Hitler in a political debate.
by West Stand Man » 11 Mar 2009 19:48
seahawk10West Stand ManSchards#2 The reason for the 'blip' is that we are not a very good football team.
And we would still not be very good if the Charlton equaliser had gone wide instead of going in.
The blip was the freescoring run earlier in the season.
So what about the other teams in this league then? The ones who are nearly all below us in the table and the 2 that are ahead of us having played 2 extra games? What is your view on them, pray tell?
They would be even more dull and uninspiring than us of course. I am content with being dull and uninspiring and finishing in the top two. I would take that in a heartbeat.
by Schards#2 » 11 Mar 2009 20:06
West Stand ManSchards#2 The reason for the 'blip' is that we are not a very good football team.
And we would still not be very good if the Charlton equaliser had gone wide instead of going in.
The blip was the freescoring run earlier in the season.
So what about the other teams in this league then? The ones who are nearly all below us in the table and the 2 that are ahead of us having played 2 extra games? What is your view on them, pray tell?
Users browsing this forum: MartinRdg, WimborneRoyal and 218 guests