palace match thread

229 posts
Royalee
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 6470
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 12:58
Location: Reading, hazar

Re: palace match thread

by Royalee » 22 Mar 2009 12:29

cmonurz
Royalee I think you'll find that when we played our best football in that Championship winning season, Hunt wasn't in the team.

Maybe it's you who has the short memory?


Which games did he miss, and what were the results?

Here you go:

Watford (a) 0-0
Burnley (h) 2-1
Coventry (a) 1-1
Norwich (a) 1-0
Hull (a) 1-1
Palace (a) 1-1
Norwich (h) 4-0
Sheff Utd (a) 1-1

So Hunt missed 8 games in 05/06, and we won 3 and drew 5 of them, the only emphatic result being the 4-0 win over Norwich in January.

So how did we 'play our best football' when Hunt wasn't in the side?

Is your memory poor Royalee, or are you just making throw away remarks with no basis in fact?


Exactly how many games did he start? He was brought on several times, usually when we were in the lead and coasting.

User avatar
SLAMMED
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 7514
Joined: 19 May 2008 16:12
Location: Let's leave before the lights come on

Re: palace match thread

by SLAMMED » 22 Mar 2009 13:59

cmonurz Shane Long = the new Stephen Hunt.

Useless?

User avatar
FiNeRaIn
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 6231
Joined: 22 Jul 2004 17:44
Location: Los Angeles

Re: palace match thread

by FiNeRaIn » 22 Mar 2009 14:24

Shane long, 1 good thing and one bad in no particular order.

Sometimes he'll have a crap touch, give the ball away then tackle and concede the throw.

yesterday he did some brilliant holdup playn ran out wide... then lost the ball like a sunday league player.

User avatar
rg6royal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3734
Joined: 17 Aug 2006 22:38
Location: Lowers

Re: palace match thread

by rg6royal » 22 Mar 2009 14:30

Why the hell isn't NHunt playing?

It's an absolute Joke tbh.

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: palace match thread

by brendywendy » 22 Mar 2009 17:05

papereyes
cmonurz
Royalee I think you'll find that when we played our best football in that Championship winning season, Hunt wasn't in the team.

Maybe it's you who has the short memory?


Which games did he miss, and what were the results?

Here you go:

Watford (a) 0-0
Burnley (h) 2-1
Coventry (a) 1-1
Norwich (a) 1-0
Hull (a) 1-1
Palace (a) 1-1
Norwich (h) 4-0
Sheff Utd (a) 1-1

So Hunt missed 8 games in 05/06, and we won 3 and drew 5 of them, the only emphatic result being the 4-0 win over Norwich in January.

So how did we 'play our best football' when Hunt wasn't in the side?

Is your memory poor Royalee, or are you just making throw away remarks with no basis in fact?


I just looked up his appearance record and it was 3 (35)

which made me lol


lollipops!
support role at best
, and looked top end of average in a role as long term sub


User avatar
cmonurz
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12384
Joined: 21 Apr 2004 22:50
Location: Nob nob nob nob nob nob

Re: palace match thread

by cmonurz » 22 Mar 2009 18:12

Have to admit my memory failed me, and I thought Hunt had started about half of those games. Nevertheless, that's twice this week that someone has posted 'we are/were better off without Kebe/Hunt' when their contributions have been to a current 3rd place, and a record points total, respectively. Feels sometimes like posters are searching for historic evidence to back up their opinions, which isn't required.

S09Royal
Member
Posts: 535
Joined: 29 Sep 2008 19:01

Re: palace match thread

by S09Royal » 22 Mar 2009 18:15

rg6royal Why the hell isn't NHunt playing?

It's an absolute Joke tbh.


'greed.
Earlier on in the game we had a corner, Doyle flicked it and the ball went over the bar. Someone around me said earlier in the season NHunt comfortably put those away. BRING BACK NHUNT, COPPELL! :mrgreen:

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: palace match thread

by brendywendy » 22 Mar 2009 18:29

PEARCEY
howser There is a lot of individual players getting critisised around yesterdays result and perfromance, but at the end of the day it was a very very poor TEAM perfromance, individuals make mistakes, but yesterdays display was nothing about individual errors, it was about a side , with no confidence, passionless, that seem to have very little desire or effort to win. A side third in the table should be able to get at least one shot on goal during 90 minutes + time added on. Very dissappointing, though not totally surprising display, many say that our destiny is in our own hands, can we raise our game to finish second, I doubt it, and we certainly don't have, in the present side, the guts, desire or determination to succeed in the play-offs.



As of now our destiny is not in our hands. Its in Cardiffs though.



no it isnt

User avatar
brendywendy
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 12060
Joined: 04 Aug 2006 15:29
Location: coming straight outa crowthorne

Re: palace match thread

by brendywendy » 22 Mar 2009 18:30

cmonurz Have to admit my memory failed me, and I thought Hunt had started about half of those games. Nevertheless, that's twice this week that someone has posted 'we are/were better off without Kebe/Hunt' when their contributions have been to a current 3rd place, and a record points total, respectively. Feels sometimes like posters are searching for historic evidence to back up their opinions, which isn't required.



think yesterday showed we need kebe

dunno about shunty though


User avatar
shoey
Member
Posts: 268
Joined: 22 Mar 2008 19:31

Re: palace match thread

by shoey » 22 Mar 2009 18:41

kebe was shit until he went off!

he made one run when he ran the ball out of play, and a second when he tripped over the ball in the palace box.

How did we need that?

I think N hunt is a good call, he can play wide right too, stick doyle back up top wit kits.

N Hunt played right for dundee utd, and was in the scots premier team of the season their, and top goal scorer.

I think we have missed him, and when him and steve play they love it, start of the season they were banging them in, with doyle

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: palace match thread

by Woodcote Royal » 22 Mar 2009 18:59

brendywendy
cmonurz Have to admit my memory failed me, and I thought Hunt had started about half of those games. Nevertheless, that's twice this week that someone has posted 'we are/were better off without Kebe/Hunt' when their contributions have been to a current 3rd place, and a record points total, respectively. Feels sometimes like posters are searching for historic evidence to back up their opinions, which isn't required.



think yesterday showed we need kebe

dunno about shunty though


Agreed.

If Kebe was sh+t, apparantly :roll: before he went off, God knows what that says about his replacement :shock:

After Kebe's departure we lost any pace in the final third with Doyle looking laboured.

We know he's not perfect but when will people get off this guys back? Right now he's our best Winger and we need him badly................leave him alone, FFS :evil:

The latest version of Glen Little looks slower than me with the decision to loan out Henry more shortsighted by the day.

User avatar
The 17 Bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3154
Joined: 24 May 2006 21:08

Re: palace match thread

by The 17 Bus » 22 Mar 2009 19:08

So Coppell goes for a 5 man midfield, and now fans moan about only having one up front!!

Perhaps the reality is that too many of the players are not actually that good, but it takes time to create a new team, we are still in that process. Many have mentioned the younger players, henry, pearce, karacan, and can we see a new young home grown team starting to appear??

Woodcote Royal
Hob Nob Subscriber
Hob Nob Subscriber
Posts: 3490
Joined: 13 Apr 2004 23:24
Location: Relocation to Surrey completed

Re: palace match thread

by Woodcote Royal » 22 Mar 2009 19:13

And plenty aren't moaning about 4-5-1.

However, from what I've seen of Glen Little, not to mention the dire form of Stephen Hunt, Henry's loan is looking pretty effing silly.


PEARCEY
Hob Nob Addict
Posts: 5970
Joined: 29 Jun 2007 23:44

Re: palace match thread

by PEARCEY » 22 Mar 2009 19:13

brendywendy
PEARCEY
howser There is a lot of individual players getting critisised around yesterdays result and perfromance, but at the end of the day it was a very very poor TEAM perfromance, individuals make mistakes, but yesterdays display was nothing about individual errors, it was about a side , with no confidence, passionless, that seem to have very little desire or effort to win. A side third in the table should be able to get at least one shot on goal during 90 minutes + time added on. Very dissappointing, though not totally surprising display, many say that our destiny is in our own hands, can we raise our game to finish second, I doubt it, and we certainly don't have, in the present side, the guts, desire or determination to succeed in the play-offs.



As of now our destiny is not in our hands. Its in Cardiffs though.



no it isnt


True ..its now in our hands and Brums and Sheff Utds...

User avatar
The 17 Bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3154
Joined: 24 May 2006 21:08

Re: palace match thread

by The 17 Bus » 22 Mar 2009 19:18

it is now in our hands totally, win 7 and we go up, it is what it means.

User avatar
Upper West Ginger
Member
Posts: 900
Joined: 09 Jun 2007 01:38
Location: Dario Gradi's garden shed

Re: palace match thread

by Upper West Ginger » 22 Mar 2009 20:19

Looking at the recording of the match, I think Kebe injured himself very early on - possibly when inadvertently taking the ball out of play. He seemed to be a bit lame (in both senses) immediately after that incident. So perhaps the "Kebe was sh*t even before he came off" was a symptom of the injury, rather than him just having one of his off games.

CMRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2011
Joined: 18 Aug 2007 19:18

Re: palace match thread

by CMRoyal » 22 Mar 2009 20:38

Upper West Ginger Looking at the recording of the match, I think Kebe injured himself very early on - possibly when inadvertently taking the ball out of play. He seemed to be a bit lame (in both senses) immediately after that incident. So perhaps the "Kebe was sh*t even before he came off" was a symptom of the injury, rather than him just having one of his off games.


Definitely. Happened right in front of us - started reasonably confidently then seemed to twist or pull something as he tried to retrieve the ball on the line. He was clearly not up to it for a good five minutes before he went off.

User avatar
RobRoyal
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 2900
Joined: 26 Apr 2004 16:11
Location: Surely you're joking?

Re: palace match thread

by RobRoyal » 22 Mar 2009 22:48

cmonurz
Royalee I think you'll find that when we played our best football in that Championship winning season, Hunt wasn't in the team.

Maybe it's you who has the short memory?


Which games did he miss, and what were the results?

Here you go:

Watford (a) 0-0
Burnley (h) 2-1
Coventry (a) 1-1
Norwich (a) 1-0
Hull (a) 1-1
Palace (a) 1-1
Norwich (h) 4-0
Sheff Utd (a) 1-1

So Hunt missed 8 games in 05/06, and we won 3 and drew 5 of them, the only emphatic result being the 4-0 win over Norwich in January.

So how did we 'play our best football' when Hunt wasn't in the side?

Is your memory poor Royalee, or are you just making throw away remarks with no basis in fact?


You're worse than the Snowball, worse than the snowball....

bootboy
Member
Posts: 92
Joined: 26 May 2006 22:21

Re: palace match thread

by bootboy » 23 Mar 2009 10:51

Woodcote Royal And plenty aren't moaning about 4-5-1.

However, from what I've seen of Glen Little, not to mention the dire form of Stephen Hunt, Henry's loan is looking pretty effing silly.

Henrys loan would only look silly if there was any intent to use him. If not then he is better served gaining experience & match fitness. Besides his loan extension has a 24hr recall clause after the initial 1 month loan spell, so he can now be recalled & would be up to match speed.

User avatar
Skyline
Member
Posts: 841
Joined: 14 Apr 2004 13:50
Location: The squirrel's not important

Re: palace match thread

by Skyline » 23 Mar 2009 11:21

cmonurz Why the hell are both teams in away kits? :roll:


Only just got around to reading this thread, and I know it's got nothing to do with the various character assassinations that seem to be dominating as the moment, but I did have to smile when I saw this comment. cmonurz on the ball as normal - do you not bother watching any of the various Championship highlight programmes to keep an eye on what our opponents are doing? Have you not noticed that Palace have completely changed their home kit this season?

229 posts

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 100 guests

It is currently 25 Dec 2024 08:07