Discontent at the Mad Stad

User avatar
North Somerset Royal
Member
Posts: 936
Joined: 09 Apr 2007 03:58
Location: Stuck on M4

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by North Somerset Royal » 17 May 2009 10:09

Fair enough. Anyway it hardly matters given that SHunt, Kits & Dill will soon be but distant memories.

Tommy Jones
Member
Posts: 15
Joined: 19 Apr 2008 17:49

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by Tommy Jones » 17 May 2009 20:29

Terminal Boardom After we won promotion in 2006, there were stories about that the club were trying to renage on the bonuses for players for achieving promotion. Was the collapse in home form a sign from the players that all was not well behind the scenes and that there were some nasty rumours doing the rounds about what the players would or wouldn't get?


Absolute rubbish !!! . . . .Certain players heads got to big after thier first successful season in the premiership......Kitson, Shorey, Sonko, Little, good ridance to you....never darken our doorstep again !!!!
Lita, what a waste !! more interested in the aspects of the nightclub life style and a trouble maker no doubt as was Alan Bennett. hence why they were farmed out !!

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by Southbank Old Boy » 17 May 2009 21:37

Ian Royal
He played upfront as a wide forward. It was pretty obviously the same 4-3-3 we played away. Just look at the midfield, it was identical. When Kitson came on in the first leg he was out on the left hand side of the attacking 3. Same way as Church was on the right and side of the three in the second leg.


That's the wing!

If you look at the areas Church played in, they were out wide, including defending infront of rosenoir, thats not playing in Kitsons position

User avatar
Ian Royal
Hob Nob Legend
Posts: 35156
Joined: 15 Apr 2004 13:43
Location: Playing spot the pc*nt on HNA?

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by Ian Royal » 17 May 2009 22:19

It's playing in the position Kitson was playing in, in the previous game when he replaced Doyle. We certainly weren't playing 1 up front. 2 wide forwards and a central striker.

User avatar
Southbank Old Boy
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 1954
Joined: 15 Aug 2006 18:42

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by Southbank Old Boy » 17 May 2009 22:42

Ian Royal It's playing in the position Kitson was playing in, in the previous game when he replaced Doyle. We certainly weren't playing 1 up front. 2 wide forwards and a central striker.


He wasnt playing in the position Kits was playing in. As someone else pointed out, Kitson played through the middle when he came on in the previous game, Church played out on the wing :roll:


User avatar
North Somerset Royal
Member
Posts: 936
Joined: 09 Apr 2007 03:58
Location: Stuck on M4

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by North Somerset Royal » 17 May 2009 22:45

We started 4-3-3 with Long preferred over Kitson for centre forward role and Church and Kebe the front wide men. Church was subsequently replaced by Little. At least thats what is says on the OS!

User avatar
Dirk Gently
Hob Nob Super-Addict
Posts: 11766
Joined: 08 Sep 2005 13:54

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by Dirk Gently » 17 May 2009 23:05

I have no inside knowledge on this one, but this story sounds extremely plausible, and I have heard if from a couple of people (although of course it may have started with the same source, or been exaggerated as it went on).

It certainly wouldn't surprise me in the slightest if Kitson came out with such a smart-arse remark to inflame the situation - he's got a long and distinguished record of doing that.,

User avatar
The 17 Bus
Hob Nob Regular
Posts: 3154
Joined: 24 May 2006 21:08

Re: Discontent at the Mad Stad

by The 17 Bus » 18 May 2009 09:46

comments get made, if true it shows that the dressing room was not such a happy place, it also shows that coppell was a tad stuffed, with senior players acting like that I would say it was in the best interests of some of the younger players to go out on loan while things were sorted out at RFC, and there is one hell of a sort out started.

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 26 guests

It is currently 10 Nov 2024 03:19