by Millsy »
20 May 2009 13:06
Royal Rother It seems to me that very few managers who have been successful long-term at one club make it again - particularly after a break from management.
I wouldn't have a particular problem with his appointment as he's a decent guy but I somehow doubt Curbishley is right for us.
Rodgers feels right for us.
So now we're going on a vague gut feeling!?
I don't know you could be right, but *to me* Rodgers feels wrong.
That's why feeling is useless and I'd rather go by hard facts.
I'd rather have Curbs over Rodgers based on facts: i.e. better/longer record.
Coppell had breaks yet managed to be a success again, if not even more of a success than he was with Palace. I don't think one can generalise about people who have breaks.
Not too long ago I remind you that people here slagged Coppell off left right and centre and I almost singlehandedly (certainly at the start) fought off all the know-it-all opposition here by simply pointing to his amazing record arguing that it speaks volumes and that he'd eventually come good. The rest is history. (Unfortunately his record of leaving clubs when he feels low also repeated itself!)
The point is my foresight had nothing to do with knowing what I'm talking about, because I don't. There are *many* people here much more knowledgable about managers and football than I am. But it does go to show that a strong record means more than an informed opinion or an informed feeling and Curbs wins hands down in that department.
Having said that though the most knowledgeable of all as far as I'm concerned is our excellent board. This is the board that signed McGhee, signed Pardew, and signed Coppell. Burns and Bullivant were mistakes but 3 out of 5 isn't bad. If the Madman chooses Rodgers (or even Bullivant again for that matter) I will have confidence with his decision. They have proven that they largely know what they're doing even they ultimately go by feeling