by Royalee » 04 Jun 2009 15:08
by Handsome Man » 04 Jun 2009 15:11
by I was there at Elm Park » 04 Jun 2009 15:12
by Vision » 04 Jun 2009 15:13
Handsome Man Cheapskates
I would have preferred us spending £2 million on a showbiz manager.
How is Brendan Rogers going to be able to raise the clubs profile on Sky Sports?
A year a go we had the chance to get Big Sam in and we blew it.
Royalee Glad to see how determined he was to come here based on the comments of the Watford chairman - welcome back Brendan.
by loyalroyal4life » 04 Jun 2009 15:14
Don't get me wrong, I'll be more than happy if Harper proves me wrong as it'll be good for the club. I just think Matejovsky's a far superior player.
loyalroyal4lifeDon't get me wrong, I'll be more than happy if Harper proves me wrong as it'll be good for the club. I just think Matejovsky's a far superior player.
If rodgers has got any sense he will play marek and tabb and flog harps
by I was there at Elm Park » 04 Jun 2009 15:18
Handsome Man Cheapskates
1. I would have preferred us spending £2 million on a showbiz manager.
2. How is Brendan Rogers going to be able to raise the clubs profile on Sky Sports?
3. A year a go we had the chance to get Big Sam in and we blew it.
by Royal Rother » 04 Jun 2009 15:18
boy1985Royalee Glad to see how determined he was to come here based on the comments of the Watford chairman - welcome back Brendan.
But will he be just as determined to leave when a bigger club comes knocking?
by Focher » 04 Jun 2009 15:18
by Royal Rother » 04 Jun 2009 15:19
I was there at Elm ParkHandsome Man Cheapskates
1. I would have preferred us spending £2 million on a showbiz manager.
2. How is Brendan Rogers going to be able to raise the clubs profile on Sky Sports?
3. A year a go we had the chance to get Big Sam in and we blew it.
1. Who? Martinez would never have joined us, Fergie Jnr may have been the same.
2. Why is that important? He seems to have a good reputation within the footballing world and that is more important than the club's profile on Sky Sports.
3. Really? What evidence is there for that? I reckon if Coppell had gone we just would have appointed Rodgers a year earlier.
by Barry the bird boggler » 04 Jun 2009 15:19
by Royalee » 04 Jun 2009 15:20
boy1985Royalee Glad to see how determined he was to come here based on the comments of the Watford chairman - welcome back Brendan.
But will he be just as determined to leave when a bigger club comes knocking?
Royal Rotherboy1985Royalee Glad to see how determined he was to come here based on the comments of the Watford chairman - welcome back Brendan.
But will he be just as determined to leave when a bigger club comes knocking?
They will only come knocking if he's done a great job here first. One step at a time eh?
by Royalee » 04 Jun 2009 15:21
boy1985
We came knocking before he had done a good job though....
by Royal Rother » 04 Jun 2009 15:21
Royaleeboy1985Royalee Glad to see how determined he was to come here based on the comments of the Watford chairman - welcome back Brendan.
But will he be just as determined to leave when a bigger club comes knocking?
If they do then surely that means he'll have done a good job here, meaning he'll have been a good appointment?
by TFF » 04 Jun 2009 15:25
Barry the bird boggler Well the games with Watford next season really will have a real taste of a local derby about them for once!
by Gordons Cumming » 04 Jun 2009 15:26
by RoyalBlue » 04 Jun 2009 15:31
Users browsing this forum: ankeny, Clyde1998, From Despair To Where?, John Madejski's Wallet, Sutekh and 241 guests