by Vision » 05 Jun 2009 14:34
by Gordons Cumming » 05 Jun 2009 15:00
Vision They've got a cheek and short memories. I've never forgiven them for stealing Trevor Senior when we were on the verge of greatness.
by Dr Hfuhruhurr » 05 Jun 2009 15:01
by brendywendy » 05 Jun 2009 15:03
by Arch » 05 Jun 2009 15:13
by Royal Rother » 05 Jun 2009 15:31
by Arnie_Pie » 05 Jun 2009 15:35
by readingbedding » 05 Jun 2009 15:35
by brendywendy » 05 Jun 2009 15:37
by readingbedding » 05 Jun 2009 15:38
by RoyalBlue » 05 Jun 2009 16:17
Blue and White Toucanby West Stand Man on 05 Jun 2009 08:56
There is a marked difference beyween the Rodgers and Pardew stories - and it is a key one to the approach of the clubs involved.
When AP declared his loyalty to Reading it was against a backdrop of RFC's refusal to release him to talk to West Ham. He resigned from this club before being formally or openly interviewed by West Ham, having quite obviously had an under the counter approach to make it clear that the job was his. Nothing that either he or West Ham did was morally clean.
Reading asked Watford for permission to interview Rodger and they agreed. He came willingly to attend the interview. It is pretty clear that you don't normally go to a job interview with a rival unless you plan to accept if offered the post. Reading and Rodgers are morally very clean on this one.
Of course Watford fans are upset, that is quite normal for just about any bunch of fans who have lost a manager- but let's not miss the facts here.
There is a marked difference beyween the Rodgers and Pardew stories - and it is a key one to the approach of the clubs involved.
When AP declared his loyalty to Reading it was against a backdrop of RFC's refusal to release him to talk to West Ham. He resigned from this club before being formally or openly interviewed by West Ham, having quite obviously had an under the counter approach to make it clear that the job was his. Nothing that either he or West Ham did was morally clean.
Reading asked Watford for permission to interview Rodger and they agreed. He came willingly to attend the interview. It is pretty clear that you don't normally go to a job interview with a rival unless you plan to accept if offered the post. Reading and Rodgers are morally very clean on this one.
Of course Watford fans are upset, that is quite normal for just about any bunch of fans who have lost a manager- but let's not miss the facts here.
+1
And on the FSB situation did he not agree to stay and shake Sir Johns hand the night before he decided to leave?
by andrew1957 » 05 Jun 2009 18:27
by NR_Royal » 05 Jun 2009 19:00
by Deathy » 05 Jun 2009 19:07
by Rawlie19 » 05 Jun 2009 19:10
Deathy Reading are the new L*t*n
Reasons why.
1) They feckin' cheat by scoring goals against us that don't actually go in the feckin' net.
2) They nick our fat, ugly greedy manager.
3) They try and look like QPR
4) They are cants
Someone tell those prats we wore the fuking hoops first! Please!! I hate that comment!
by Rawlie19 » 05 Jun 2009 19:16
by Deathy » 05 Jun 2009 19:19
Rawlie19Deathy Reading are the new L*t*n
Reasons why.
1) They feckin' cheat by scoring goals against us that don't actually go in the feckin' net.
2) They nick our fat, ugly greedy manager.
3) They try and look like QPR
4) They are cants
Someone tell those prats we wore the fuking hoops first! Please!! I hate that comment!
But the other 3 were ok?
by M-U-R-T-Y » 05 Jun 2009 19:24
by Deathy » 05 Jun 2009 19:26
by Rawlie19 » 05 Jun 2009 19:31
DeathyRawlie19Deathy Reading are the new L*t*n
Reasons why.
1) They feckin' cheat by scoring goals against us that don't actually go in the feckin' net.
2) They nick our fat, ugly greedy manager.
3) They try and look like QPR
4) They are cants
Someone tell those prats we wore the fuking hoops first! Please!! I hate that comment!
But the other 3 were ok?
I'd be pissed about that goal.
We dig nick their manager.
We are cunts.
Users browsing this forum: Bing [Bot] and 256 guests