by ankeny » 05 Jun 2009 21:39
by roberto_11 » 05 Jun 2009 21:51
by Deathy » 05 Jun 2009 23:36
ankeny We are very short of legends, I can only think of Parky and Murty
by percy_freeman » 05 Jun 2009 23:46
by Ian Royal » 06 Jun 2009 11:37
by Royal Rother » 06 Jun 2009 12:00
by Ian Royal » 06 Jun 2009 16:06
Royal Rother Blimey Ian, I doubt even Convey's mum wouldn't suggest he was a Reading Great!!
by Gordons Cumming » 06 Jun 2009 18:26
by Elm Park Old Boy » 06 Jun 2009 19:25
Gordons Cumming I'm afraid I can't class Murty as a legend.
by Royal Rother » 06 Jun 2009 21:36
Ian RoyalRoyal Rother Blimey Ian, I doubt even Convey's mum wouldn't suggest he was a Reading Great!!
You may notice a theme hidden amongst all those names. Tell me when you see it.
by Ian Royal » 06 Jun 2009 21:40
Ian Royal Legends should be scarce. I don't think we have many and that's as it should be.
Parky, Murty, Death, Friday, Gilkes, Hicks, Senior, Blackman.
But you can add in a huge number of Greats who don't quite step up to Legend but are still worthy of note.
Gooding, Hahnemann, Ingimarsson, Quinn, Sonko, Shorey, Shaka, Sidwell, Harper, Little, Kitson, Wdowczyk, Convey, SHunt, Doyle, Caskey, Gunnarsson, Bernal, Cureton, Forster...
Thats only players from the last 20 years.
by Royal Rother » 07 Jun 2009 09:53
by LoyalRoyalFan » 07 Jun 2009 10:01
by Ian Royal » 07 Jun 2009 13:00
Royal Rother Blimey, that's a bit obtuse. Anyway, 106 pah!
A couple of handfuls (at most) of good performances does not a Reading Great make...
by Royal Rother » 07 Jun 2009 21:37
by Ian Royal » 07 Jun 2009 22:10
Royal Rother We'll just have to disagree on that one.
Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 269 guests